Far cortical locking versus standard locking screw fixation in simulated femoral fractures: A biomechanical meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Bullock, Robert S. [1 ]
Coury, John G. [1 ]
Liakos, Brendan [1 ]
Huish, Eric G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Valley Consortium Med Educ, 1400 Florida Ave,Suite 200, Modesto, CA 95350 USA
关键词
Far cortical locking; Distal femur; Supracondylar femur; Nonunion; Biomechanical; DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURES; DYNAMIC CONDYLAR SCREW; PLATE FIXATION; STABILIZATION; CONSTRUCTS; LISS; STIFFNESS; STRONGER; HOLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jor.2024.09.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Far cortical locking (FCL) is a concept of locking plate fixation with reduced stiffness and symmetric micromotion to improve callus formation. The goal of our study was to review biomechanical data evaluating FCL plate and screw fixation versus standard locking (SL) plate and screw fixation by analyzing studies of cadaveric and synthetic bone models to draw biomechanical conclusions. Methods: Biomechanical studies that compared FCL and SL plate fixation for simulated femoral fractures were reviewed for construct stiffness, load to failure, axial motion at the near and far cortices, and the difference between near and far cortical axial motion to demonstrate motion symmetry. Results: FCL decreased stiffness by 1.069 kN/mm compared to SL (95 % CI 0.405 to 1.732, p = 0.002). FCL demonstrated greater axial motion than SL in the near cortex by 0.425 mm (95 % CI 0.359 to 0.491, p < 0.001) and in the far cortex by 0.456 mm (95 % CI 0.378 to 0.534, p < 0.001). FCL resulted in symmetric motion with no significant difference between far and near cortices with the far cortex displacing 0.347 mm more than near (95 % CI -0.038 to 0.731, p = 0.78). SL resulted in asymmetric motion favoring the far cortex by 0.270 mm (0.096-0.443, p = 0.002). Construct strength was not significantly different with FCL load to failure 0.367 kN greater than SL (95 % CI -0.762 to 1.496, p = 0.524). Conclusion: FCL screw fixation in femoral fractures achieves the goals of reducing construct stiffness and promoting more symmetric axial motion while maintaining construct strength. These results support the overall biomechanical goals of far cortical locking and should encourage investigation into its effects on clinical and radiographic outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 46
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Locking plate fixation versus hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ding, Miao
    Pang, Xingchen
    Li, Xugang
    Qiu, Xusheng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 44 (11) : 1445 - 1446
  • [32] Volar Locking Plate versus External Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Fu, Qiang
    Zhu, Lei
    Yang, Peng
    Chen, Aimin
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2018, 52 (06) : 602 - 610
  • [33] Volar Locking Plate versus External Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Qiang Fu
    Lei Zhu
    Peng Yang
    Aimin Chen
    Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2018, 52 : 602 - 610
  • [34] Percutaneous pinning versus volar locking plate internal fixation for unstable distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis
    Peng, Fei
    Liu, Yuan-xiang
    Wan, Zhen-yu
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-EUROPEAN VOLUME, 2018, 43 (02) : 158 - 167
  • [35] The biomechanical effect of bone quality and fracture topography on locking plate fixation in periprosthetic femoral fractures
    Leonidou, Andreas
    Moazen, Mehran
    Lepetsos, Panagiotis
    Graham, Simon M.
    Macheras, George A.
    Tsiridis, Eleftherios
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (02): : 213 - 217
  • [36] Clinical outcomes in periarticular knee fractures with flexible fixation using far cortical locking screws in locking plate: a prospective study
    Kidiyoor B.
    Kilaru P.
    Rachakonda K.R.
    Joseph V.M.
    Subramaniam G.V.
    Sankineani S.R.
    Nugur A.
    Gurava Reddy A.V.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY, 2019, 103 (2) : 149 - 153
  • [37] Meta-analysis comparing locking plate fixation with hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures
    Dai J.
    Chai Y.
    Wang C.
    Wen G.
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2014, 24 (3) : 305 - 313
  • [38] Biomechanical comparison of a unique locking plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in a cadaveric model
    Walsh, Stephen
    Reindl, Rudy
    Harvey, Edward
    Berry, Gregory
    Beckman, Lorne
    Steffen, Thomas
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2006, 21 (10) : 1027 - 1031
  • [39] Proximal femoral locking plate versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures Reply
    Dhamangaonkar, Anoop C.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2014, 22 (01): : 131 - 132
  • [40] Biomechanical effect of medial cortical support and medial screw support on locking plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures with a medial gap: a finite element analysis
    Yang, Pan
    Zhang, Ying
    Liu, Jian
    Xiao, Jin
    Ma, Li Min
    Zhu, Chang Rong
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2015, 49 (02) : 203 - 209