Factors Associated With Digital Intervention Engagement and Adherence in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Montalescot, Lucile [1 ]
Baussard, Louise [1 ]
Charbonnier, Elodie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Cite, Lab Psychopathol & Proc Sante, 71 ave Edouard Vaillant, F-92100 Boulogne Billancourt, France
关键词
adherence; engagement; eHealth; mHealth; cancer; mobile health; app; eHealth interventions; patient; cancer care; digital health; health-related; intervention-related; sociodemographic; behavior; systematic review; INTERNET-BASED INTERVENTION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; BREAST-CANCER; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; MENTAL-HEALTH; SELF-MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY TRIAL; SURVIVORS; WOMEN; ACCEPTABILITY;
D O I
10.2196/52542
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital interventions offer vital support for patients with cancer through education, behavior change, and monitoring. Despite their potential, patient adherence to and engagement with these self-help interventions is challenging. Factors like user characteristics, technology, and intervention design influence adherence and engagement. Existing reviews have gaps in exploring diverse factors associated with adherence in cancer care. Objective: This systematic review aims to identify factors influencing adherence to and engagement with digital interventions with self-helpcomponentsincancercare. It examined sociodemographic, psychosocial, health-related, and intervention-related factors that affect patients' adherence to and engagement with these digital health solutions. Methods: Following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Itemsfor Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, asearch was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO to find studies published from January 2010 to September 2021. The studies included in this review focused on adult patients with cancer using digital interventions with self-help features. Data were extracted and synthesized using a standardized approach. Factors associated with adherence were synthesized according to their type-sociodemographic factors, psychosocial factors, health-related factors, technology-related factors, and intervention-related factors. Results: Among 9386 studies initially screened, 61 (0.6%) were eligible for analysis. These studies covered diverse eHealth intervention types, cancer types, and outcome measures. Investigating the determinants of adherence to and engagement with digital interventions was the main objective for 43% (26/61) of the included studies. Adherence and engagement were gauged using varied measures, such as dropout rates, log-ins, and self-reported measures. Results regarding factors associated with adherence and engagement were inconsistent across studies. Most sociodemographic (eg, age) and health-related factors (eg, cancer stage) yielded mixed outcomes. However, comorbidity consistently predicted lower adherence and engagement. Results regarding psychosocial factors were more stable across studies. Specifically, higher social support was associated with lower adherence and engagement. Finally, intervention-related factors like intervention type or human support showed conflicting results. Adopting an intersectional perspective revealed that specificities vary according to intervention goals and the operationalization of adherence versus engagement, with women being more adherent and engaged than men in interventions targeting distress. When focusing on adherence rather than engagement, older patients were more adherent than younger patients. Conclusions:This review highlights the complexity of adherence to and engagement with digital interventions in cancer care. While some factors, notably comorbidities and low social support, were consistently linked to adherence and engagement, others displayed mixed associations. The review underscores the need for standardizing measures, investigating specific intervention features, and enhancing study quality to optimize digital interventions for patients with cancer. Further research is crucial to better understand and improve adherence to digital health solutions in cancer care. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021281028; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=281028
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 110 条
  • [31] Making Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy scalable for cancer survivors: a randomized non-inferiority trial of self-guided and technician-guided therapy
    Dirkse, D.
    Hadjistavropoulos, H. D.
    Alberts, N. A.
    Karin, E.
    Schneider, L. H.
    Titov, N.
    Dear, B. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2020, 14 (02) : 211 - 225
  • [32] A Systematic Review of the Impact of Adherence on the Effectiveness of e-Therapies
    Donkin, Liesje
    Christensen, Helen
    Naismith, Sharon L.
    Neal, Bruce
    Hickie, Ian B.
    Glozier, Nick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (03) : e52
  • [33] Guided web-based intervention for insomnia targeting breast cancer patients: Feasibility and effect
    Dozeman, Els
    Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
    Savard, Josee
    van Straten, Annemieke
    [J]. INTERNET INTERVENTIONS-THE APPLICATION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN MENTAL AND BEHAVIOURAL HEALTH, 2017, 9 : 1 - 6
  • [34] Project onward: an innovative e-health intervention for cancer survivors
    Duffecy, Jennifer
    Sanford, Stacy
    Wagner, Lynne
    Begale, Mark
    Nawacki, Ewa
    Mohr, David C.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 (04) : 947 - 951
  • [35] Impact of perceived social support on the mental health and health-related quality of life in cancer patients: results from a nationwide, multicenter survey in South Korea
    Eom, Chun-Sick
    Shin, Dong Wook
    Kim, So Young
    Yang, Hyung Kook
    Jo, Heui Sug
    Kweon, Sun Seog
    Kang, Yune Sik
    Kim, Jong-Heun
    Cho, Be-Long
    Park, Jong-Hyock
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 (06) : 1283 - 1290
  • [36] The Law of Attrition
    Eysenbach, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (01)
  • [37] Development of a Web-Based Supportive Care Program for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
    Fang, Carolyn Y.
    Galloway, Thomas J.
    Egleston, Brian L.
    Bauman, Jessica R.
    Ebersole, Barbara
    Chwistek, Marcin
    Buhler, Janice G.
    Longacre, Margaret L.
    Ridge, John A.
    Manne, Sharon L.
    Manning, Cheri
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [38] Patterns of Fitbit Use and Activity Levels Among African American Breast Cancer Survivors During an eHealth Weight Loss Randomized Controlled Trial
    Ferrante, Jeanne M.
    Lulla, Aaron
    Williamson, Julie D.
    Devine, Katie A.
    Ohman-Strickland, Pamela
    Bandera, Elisa V.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2022, 36 (01) : 94 - 105
  • [39] Feasibility and potential efficacy of commercial mHealth/eHealth tools for weight loss in African American breast cancer survivors: pilot randomized controlled trial
    Ferrante, Jeanne M.
    Devine, Katie A.
    Bator, Alicja
    Rodgers, Ashley
    Ohman-Strickland, Pamela A.
    Bandera, Elisa, V
    Hwang, Kevin O.
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2020, 10 (04) : 938 - 948
  • [40] Optimising Web-Based Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Interventions for Prostate Cancer Survivors: A Randomised Controlled Trial Examining the Impact of Website Architecture on User Engagement
    Finlay, Amy
    Evans, Holly
    Vincent, Andrew
    Wittert, Gary
    Vandelanotte, Corneel
    Short, Camille E.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) : 1 - 21