Clinical feasibility of MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsies at 0.55T

被引:1
|
作者
Kaur, Tejinder [1 ]
Jiang, Yun [1 ]
Seiberlich, Nicole [1 ]
Hussain, Hero [1 ]
Wells, Shane [1 ]
Wei, John [1 ]
Caoili, Elaine [1 ]
Gulani, Vikas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Prostate biopsy; MRI; Prostate cancer; Transrectal; Percutaneous; In-bore; ULTRASOUND FUSION; STRATEGIES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04783-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIn-bore MRI-guided biopsy allows direct visualization of suspicious lesions, biopsy needles, and trajectories, allowing accurate sampling when MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy is not feasible. However, its use has been limited. Wide-bore, lower-field, and lower-cost scanners could help address these issues, but their feasibility for prostate biopsy is unknown. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy using a large-bore (80 cm), 0.55T scanner.Materials and methodsNineteen participants (68 +/- 10 years) with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) were recruited for this Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study (May 2023 -October 2024). Prebiopsy diagnostic scans and intra-procedural T2-weighted images were used for lesion localization. PSA levels, lesion sizes, cancer detection rates, positive core volume percentage, ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade groups (GG), positive volume cores, skin to target distances, and procedure durations were reported.ResultsSeventeen participants underwent biopsies (four transrectal, thirteen percutaneous). Two participants were excluded. Twenty lesions (mean size 1.9 +/- 1.2 cm) were biopsied which showed various GG cancers (GG1, GG2, GG3, GG4, and GG5), with positive cores ranging from 10 to 100%. 20% of the lesions were benign. Compared to previous biopsies, 22.2% (2/9) had new cancer detections, 22.2% (2/9) showed a GG upgrade, and 33.3% (3/9) had increased positive core volume, while 11.1% (1/9) showed no upgrade and 11.1% (1/9) had benign findings. Among biopsy-na & iuml;ve participants, 75% (6/8) had cancer detected, and 25% (2/8) had benign findings. One new cancer was detected near a hip prosthesis due to reduced imaging artifacts. Average total procedure time was 77 +/- 21 min for transrectal and 74 +/- 22 min for percutaneous biopsies, with times to first core at 45 +/- 15 and 53 +/- 14 min, respectively.ConclusionIdentifying and accurately targeting suspicious prostate lesions is feasible using a 0.55T MRI scanner.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 18F-Choline PET/MRI: The Additional Value of PET for MRI-Guided Transrectal Prostate Biopsies
    Piert, Morand
    Montgomery, Jeffrey
    Kunju, Lakshmi Priya
    Siddiqui, Javed
    Rogers, Virginia
    Rajendiran, Thekkelnaycke
    Johnson, Timothy D.
    Shao, Xia
    Davenport, Matthew S.
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2016, 57 (07) : 1065 - 1070
  • [42] Standardised scoring of a multi-parametric 3-T MRI for a targeted MRI-guided prostate biopsy
    Arsov, C.
    Blondin, D.
    Rabenalt, R.
    Antoch, G.
    Albers, P.
    Quentin, M.
    UROLOGE, 2012, 51 (06): : 848 - +
  • [43] Robotic System for MRI-Guided Focal Laser Ablation in the Prostate
    Chen, Yue
    Squires, Alexander
    Seifabadi, Reza
    Xu, Sheng
    Agarwal, Harsh Kumar
    Bernardo, Marcelino
    Pinto, Peter A.
    Choyke, Peter
    Wood, Bradford
    Tse, Zion Tsz Ho
    IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, 2017, 22 (01) : 107 - 114
  • [44] Image registration for targeted MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    Wells, William M.
    Kikinis, Ron
    Tempany, Clare M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (04) : 987 - 992
  • [45] Comparison between "In-bore" MRI guided prostate biopsy and standard ultrasound guided biopsy in the patient with suspicious prostate cancer: Preliminary results
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Bianchi, Federico Mineo
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Corsi, Paolo
    Giampaoli, Marco
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Artibani, Walter
    Porreca, Angelo
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2019, 91 (02) : 87 - 92
  • [46] MRI-Guided Targeted and Systematic Prostate Biopsies as Prognostic Indicators for Prostate Cancer Treatment Decisions
    Abd Ali, Furat
    Sievert, Karl-Dietrich
    Eisenblaetter, Michel
    Titze, Barbara
    Hansen, Torsten
    Barth, Peter J.
    Titze, Ulf
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (15)
  • [47] MRI-guided HDR prostate brachytherapy in standard 1.5T scanner
    Ménard, C
    Susil, RC
    Choyke, P
    Gustafson, GS
    Kammerer, W
    Ning, H
    Miller, RW
    Ullman, KL
    Crouse, NS
    Smith, S
    Lessard, E
    Pouliot, J
    Wright, V
    McVeigh, E
    Coleman, CN
    Camphausen, K
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (05): : 1414 - 1423
  • [48] Impact of the Number of Cores on the Prostate Cancer Detection Rate in Men Undergoing in-Bore Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Targeted Biopsies
    Subramanian, Naveen
    Recchimuzzi, Debora Z.
    Xi, Yin
    Diaz de Leon, Alberto
    Chen, Heng
    Xie, Donglu
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Costa, Daniel N.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2021, 45 (02) : 203 - 209
  • [49] MRI-Guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy: A Clinical Accuracy Validation
    Xu, Helen
    Lasso, Andras
    Vikal, Siddharth
    Guion, Peter
    Krieger, Axel
    Kaushal, Aradhana
    Whitcomb, Louis L.
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2010, PT III, 2010, 6363 : 383 - +
  • [50] MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy of Native and Recurrent Prostate Cancer
    Woodrum, David A.
    Gorny, Krzysztof R.
    Greenwood, Bernadette
    Mynderse, Lance A.
    SEMINARS IN INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 33 (03) : 196 - 205