Clinical feasibility of MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsies at 0.55T

被引:0
|
作者
Kaur, Tejinder [1 ]
Jiang, Yun [1 ]
Seiberlich, Nicole [1 ]
Hussain, Hero [1 ]
Wells, Shane [1 ]
Wei, John [1 ]
Caoili, Elaine [1 ]
Gulani, Vikas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Prostate biopsy; MRI; Prostate cancer; Transrectal; Percutaneous; In-bore; ULTRASOUND FUSION; STRATEGIES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04783-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIn-bore MRI-guided biopsy allows direct visualization of suspicious lesions, biopsy needles, and trajectories, allowing accurate sampling when MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy is not feasible. However, its use has been limited. Wide-bore, lower-field, and lower-cost scanners could help address these issues, but their feasibility for prostate biopsy is unknown. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy using a large-bore (80 cm), 0.55T scanner.Materials and methodsNineteen participants (68 +/- 10 years) with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) were recruited for this Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study (May 2023 -October 2024). Prebiopsy diagnostic scans and intra-procedural T2-weighted images were used for lesion localization. PSA levels, lesion sizes, cancer detection rates, positive core volume percentage, ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade groups (GG), positive volume cores, skin to target distances, and procedure durations were reported.ResultsSeventeen participants underwent biopsies (four transrectal, thirteen percutaneous). Two participants were excluded. Twenty lesions (mean size 1.9 +/- 1.2 cm) were biopsied which showed various GG cancers (GG1, GG2, GG3, GG4, and GG5), with positive cores ranging from 10 to 100%. 20% of the lesions were benign. Compared to previous biopsies, 22.2% (2/9) had new cancer detections, 22.2% (2/9) showed a GG upgrade, and 33.3% (3/9) had increased positive core volume, while 11.1% (1/9) showed no upgrade and 11.1% (1/9) had benign findings. Among biopsy-na & iuml;ve participants, 75% (6/8) had cancer detected, and 25% (2/8) had benign findings. One new cancer was detected near a hip prosthesis due to reduced imaging artifacts. Average total procedure time was 77 +/- 21 min for transrectal and 74 +/- 22 min for percutaneous biopsies, with times to first core at 45 +/- 15 and 53 +/- 14 min, respectively.ConclusionIdentifying and accurately targeting suspicious prostate lesions is feasible using a 0.55T MRI scanner.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluation of Tracheomalacia Using Novel 0.55T MRI
    Kapai, S.
    Kumar, P.
    Yagiz, E.
    Kato, R. M.
    Tian, Y.
    Lee, N. G.
    Chen, M.
    Ferrada, M.
    Campbell-Washburn, A. E.
    Nayak, K. S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 209
  • [42] MRI-guided in-bore biopsy for prostate cancer: what does the evidence say? A case series of 554 patients and a review of the current literature
    Pokorny, Morgan
    Kua, Boon
    Esler, Rachel
    Yaxley, John
    Samaratunga, Hemamali
    Dunglison, Nigel
    Gianduzzo, Troy
    Coughlin, Geoff
    Holt, Ross
    Laing, Barbara
    Ault, Darren
    Brown, Nicholas
    Parkinson, Rob
    Thompson, Les
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (07) : 1263 - 1279
  • [43] MRI-guided in-bore biopsy for prostate cancer: what does the evidence say? A case series of 554 patients and a review of the current literature
    Morgan Pokorny
    Boon Kua
    Rachel Esler
    John Yaxley
    Hemamali Samaratunga
    Nigel Dunglison
    Troy Gianduzzo
    Geoff Coughlin
    Ross Holt
    Barbara Laing
    Darren Ault
    Nicholas Brown
    Rob Parkinson
    Les Thompson
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 1263 - 1279
  • [44] Feasibility and preliminary clinical tolerability of low-field MRI-guided prostate biopsy
    Sze, Christina
    Singh, Zorawar
    Punyala, Ananth
    Satya, Poorvi
    Sadinski, Molly
    Narayan, Ramkrishnan
    Nacev, Aleksander
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Adams Jr, John
    Nicholas, Kathryn
    Margolis, Daniel
    Chughtai, Bilal
    PROSTATE, 2023, 83 (07): : 656 - 662
  • [45] Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial
    Christian Arsov
    Robert Rabenalt
    Michael Quentin
    Andreas Hiester
    Dirk Blondin
    Peter Albers
    Gerald Antoch
    Lars Schimmöller
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 215 - 220
  • [46] DNP in MRI: An in-bore approach at 1.5 T
    Krummenacker, Jan G.
    Denysenkov, Vasyl P.
    Terekhov, Maxim
    Schreiber, Laura M.
    Prisner, Thomas F.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2012, 215 : 94 - 99
  • [47] Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial
    Arsov, Christian
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Quentin, Michael
    Hiester, Andreas
    Blondin, Dirk
    Albers, Peter
    Antoch, Gerald
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (02) : 215 - 220
  • [48] Feasibility of MRI-guided transurethral thermal therapy for prostate cancer
    Chopra, R
    Burtnyk, M
    Baker, SN
    Choy, V
    Lochhead, S
    Bronskill, MJ
    2004 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, Vols 1-3, 2004, : 713 - 715
  • [49] Feasibility and clinical implementation of MRI-guided surface brachytherapy
    Lavelle, Michael J.
    Kaza, Evangelia
    Guthier, Christian V.
    O'Farrell, Desmond A.
    Harris, Thomas C.
    Cormack, Robert A.
    Devlin, Phillip M.
    Buzurovic, Ivan M.
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2024, 16 (01) : 48 - 56
  • [50] Clinical Outcomes of Benign Concordant MRI-Guided Breast Biopsies
    Cha, Eumee
    Oluyemi, Eniola T.
    Ambinder, Emily B.
    Myers, Kelly S.
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2024, 24 (07) : 597 - 603