Clinical feasibility of MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsies at 0.55T

被引:0
|
作者
Kaur, Tejinder [1 ]
Jiang, Yun [1 ]
Seiberlich, Nicole [1 ]
Hussain, Hero [1 ]
Wells, Shane [1 ]
Wei, John [1 ]
Caoili, Elaine [1 ]
Gulani, Vikas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Prostate biopsy; MRI; Prostate cancer; Transrectal; Percutaneous; In-bore; ULTRASOUND FUSION; STRATEGIES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04783-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIn-bore MRI-guided biopsy allows direct visualization of suspicious lesions, biopsy needles, and trajectories, allowing accurate sampling when MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy is not feasible. However, its use has been limited. Wide-bore, lower-field, and lower-cost scanners could help address these issues, but their feasibility for prostate biopsy is unknown. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy using a large-bore (80 cm), 0.55T scanner.Materials and methodsNineteen participants (68 +/- 10 years) with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) were recruited for this Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study (May 2023 -October 2024). Prebiopsy diagnostic scans and intra-procedural T2-weighted images were used for lesion localization. PSA levels, lesion sizes, cancer detection rates, positive core volume percentage, ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade groups (GG), positive volume cores, skin to target distances, and procedure durations were reported.ResultsSeventeen participants underwent biopsies (four transrectal, thirteen percutaneous). Two participants were excluded. Twenty lesions (mean size 1.9 +/- 1.2 cm) were biopsied which showed various GG cancers (GG1, GG2, GG3, GG4, and GG5), with positive cores ranging from 10 to 100%. 20% of the lesions were benign. Compared to previous biopsies, 22.2% (2/9) had new cancer detections, 22.2% (2/9) showed a GG upgrade, and 33.3% (3/9) had increased positive core volume, while 11.1% (1/9) showed no upgrade and 11.1% (1/9) had benign findings. Among biopsy-na & iuml;ve participants, 75% (6/8) had cancer detected, and 25% (2/8) had benign findings. One new cancer was detected near a hip prosthesis due to reduced imaging artifacts. Average total procedure time was 77 +/- 21 min for transrectal and 74 +/- 22 min for percutaneous biopsies, with times to first core at 45 +/- 15 and 53 +/- 14 min, respectively.ConclusionIdentifying and accurately targeting suspicious prostate lesions is feasible using a 0.55T MRI scanner.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In-bore MRI-guided biopsy: can it optimize the need for periodic biopsies in prostate cancer patients undergoing active surveillance? A pilot test-retest reliability study
    Elfatairy, Kareem K.
    Filson, Christopher P.
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Osunkoya, Adeboye O.
    Geller, Rachel L.
    Nour, Sherif G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 91 (1084):
  • [32] Can In-bore MRI-guided Biopsy Accurately Predict Index Tumor Nodules in Radical Prostatectomy?
    Chintalapati, Suneetha
    Kong, Qingnuan
    Francis, Franto
    Costa, Daniel
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Subramanian, Naveen
    Lotan, Julia
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Zhou, Ming
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2019, 99
  • [33] In-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy in a patient group with PI-RADS 4 and 5 targets: A single center experience
    Vural, Metin
    Coskun, Bilgen
    Kilic, Mert
    Durmaz, Selahattin
    Gumus, Terman
    Cengiz, Duygu
    Onay, Aslihan
    Saglican, Yesim
    Colakoglu, Bulent
    Akpek, Sergin
    Yildirim, Hakan
    Esen, Tarik
    Rozanes, Izzet
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 141
  • [34] Feasibility of MRI-Guided Cardiac Catheterization, Angioplasty, and Stenting in a 0.55 T Scanner with Limited Gradient Performance
    Armstrong, Aimee
    Krishnamurthy, Ramkumar
    Swinning, Jason
    Liu, Yingmin
    Joseph, Matthew
    Simonetti, Orlando
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2022, 43 (08) : 1972 - 1972
  • [35] Can In-bore MRI-guided Biopsy Accurately Predict Index Tumor Nodules in Radical Prostatectomy?
    Chintalapati, Suneetha
    Kong, Qingnuan
    Francis, Franto
    Costa, Daniel
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Subramanian, Naveen
    Lotan, Julia
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Zhou, Ming
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2019, 32
  • [36] MRI-guided biopsies and minimally invasive therapy for prostate cancer
    Ghai, Sangeet
    Trachtenberg, John
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 31 (03) : 209 - 216
  • [37] Evaluation of a robotic technique for transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsies
    Schouten, Martijn G.
    Bomers, Joyce G. R.
    Yakar, Derya
    Huisman, Henkjan
    Rothgang, Eva
    Bosboom, Dennis
    Scheenen, Tom W. J.
    Misra, Sarthak
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (02) : 476 - 483
  • [38] Gleason Grade Group Concordance between Preoperative Targeted Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Histopathologic Analysis: A Comparison Between In-Bore MRI-guided and MRI-Transrectal US Fusion Prostate Biopsies
    Costa, Daniel N.
    Cai, Qi
    Xi, Yin
    Recchimuzzi, Debora Z.
    Subramanian, Naveen
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    Rofsky, Neil M.
    Roehrborn, Claus G.
    Hornberger, Brad
    Shah, Rajal B.
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2021, 3 (02):
  • [39] Evaluation of a robotic technique for transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsies
    Martijn G. Schouten
    Joyce G. R. Bomers
    Derya Yakar
    Henkjan Huisman
    Eva Rothgang
    Dennis Bosboom
    Tom W. J. Scheenen
    Sarthak Misra
    Jurgen J. Fütterer
    European Radiology, 2012, 22 : 476 - 483
  • [40] Body composition profiling at 0.55T: Feasibility and precision
    Nayak, Krishna S.
    Cui, Sophia X.
    Tasdelen, Bilal
    Yagiz, Ecrin
    Weston, Sarah
    Zhong, Xiaodong
    Ahlgren, Andre
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 90 (03) : 1114 - 1120