Clinical feasibility of MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsies at 0.55T

被引:0
|
作者
Kaur, Tejinder [1 ]
Jiang, Yun [1 ]
Seiberlich, Nicole [1 ]
Hussain, Hero [1 ]
Wells, Shane [1 ]
Wei, John [1 ]
Caoili, Elaine [1 ]
Gulani, Vikas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Prostate biopsy; MRI; Prostate cancer; Transrectal; Percutaneous; In-bore; ULTRASOUND FUSION; STRATEGIES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04783-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIn-bore MRI-guided biopsy allows direct visualization of suspicious lesions, biopsy needles, and trajectories, allowing accurate sampling when MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy is not feasible. However, its use has been limited. Wide-bore, lower-field, and lower-cost scanners could help address these issues, but their feasibility for prostate biopsy is unknown. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy using a large-bore (80 cm), 0.55T scanner.Materials and methodsNineteen participants (68 +/- 10 years) with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) were recruited for this Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study (May 2023 -October 2024). Prebiopsy diagnostic scans and intra-procedural T2-weighted images were used for lesion localization. PSA levels, lesion sizes, cancer detection rates, positive core volume percentage, ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade groups (GG), positive volume cores, skin to target distances, and procedure durations were reported.ResultsSeventeen participants underwent biopsies (four transrectal, thirteen percutaneous). Two participants were excluded. Twenty lesions (mean size 1.9 +/- 1.2 cm) were biopsied which showed various GG cancers (GG1, GG2, GG3, GG4, and GG5), with positive cores ranging from 10 to 100%. 20% of the lesions were benign. Compared to previous biopsies, 22.2% (2/9) had new cancer detections, 22.2% (2/9) showed a GG upgrade, and 33.3% (3/9) had increased positive core volume, while 11.1% (1/9) showed no upgrade and 11.1% (1/9) had benign findings. Among biopsy-na & iuml;ve participants, 75% (6/8) had cancer detected, and 25% (2/8) had benign findings. One new cancer was detected near a hip prosthesis due to reduced imaging artifacts. Average total procedure time was 77 +/- 21 min for transrectal and 74 +/- 22 min for percutaneous biopsies, with times to first core at 45 +/- 15 and 53 +/- 14 min, respectively.ConclusionIdentifying and accurately targeting suspicious prostate lesions is feasible using a 0.55T MRI scanner.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] GLEASON GRADE GROUP CONCORDANCE BETWEEN PREOPERATIVE TARGETED BIOPSY AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A COMPARISON BETWEEN IN-BORE MRI-GUIDED AND MRI-TRUS FUSION PROSTATE BIOPSIES
    Costa, Daniel
    Recchimuzzi, Debora
    Xi, Yin
    de Leon, Alberto Diaz
    Roehrborn, Claus
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey
    Margulis, Vitaly
    Jia, Liwei
    Goldberg, Kenneth
    Rofsky, Neil
    Pedrosa, Ivan
    Bagrodia, Aditya
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E191 - E192
  • [22] In-Bore Experimental Validation of Active Compensation and Membrane Puncture Detection for Targeted MRI-Guided Robotic Prostate Biopsy
    Wartenberg, Marek
    Gandomi, Katie
    Carvalho, Paulo
    Schornak, Joseph
    Patel, Niravkumar
    Iordachita, Iulian
    Tempany, Clare
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Fischer, Gregory S.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EXPERIMENTAL ROBOTICS, 2020, 11 : 34 - 44
  • [23] MRI-Guided In-Bore Biopsy: Differences Between Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization in Primary and Secondary Biopsy Settings
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Blondin, Dirk
    Arsov, Christian
    Rabenalt, Robert
    Albers, Peter
    Antoch, Gerald
    Quentin, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2016, 206 (01) : 92 - 99
  • [24] A workspace-orientated needle-guiding robot for 3T MRI-guided transperineal prostate intervention: evaluation of in-bore workspace and MRI compatibility
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    Iordachita, Iulian
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    Tempany, Clare
    Tokuda, Junichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2013, 9 (01): : 67 - 74
  • [25] COMPLICATION RATES FOR OUTPATIENT, TRANSRECTAL, IN-BORE MRI-GUIDED BIOPSY: SEVEN YEARS' EXPERIENCE
    Feller, John
    Greenwood, Bernadette
    May, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E820 - E820
  • [26] Prostate cancer detection with transrectal in-bore MRI biopsies: impact of prostate volume and lesion features
    Schaudinn, Alexander
    Busse, Harald
    Ehrengut, Constantin
    Linder, Nicolas
    Ludwig, Jonna
    Franz, Toni
    Horn, Lars-Christian
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Denecke, Timm
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2025, 16 (01):
  • [27] In-bore biopsies of the prostate assisted by a remote-controlled manipulator at 1.5 T
    Nicolas Linder
    Alexander Schaudinn
    Tim-Ole Petersen
    Nikolaos Bailis
    Patrick Stumpp
    Lars-Christian Horn
    Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
    Thomas Kahn
    Michael Moche
    Harald Busse
    Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2019, 32 : 599 - 605
  • [28] Imaging of clinically silent rectoprostatic hematoma in MRI guided in-bore prostate biopsy
    Marietta Garmer
    Christin Hoffmann
    Dietrich Grönemeyer
    Birgit Wagener
    Lars Kamper
    Patrick Haage
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [29] Imaging of clinically silent rectoprostatic hematoma in MRI guided in-bore prostate biopsy
    Garmer, Marietta
    Hoffmann, Christin
    Groenemeyer, Dietrich
    Wagener, Birgit
    Kamper, Lars
    Haage, Patrick
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [30] In-bore biopsies of the prostate assisted by a remote-controlled manipulator at 1.5 T
    Linder, Nicolas
    Schaudinn, Alexander
    Petersen, Tim-Ole
    Bailis, Nikolaos
    Stumpp, Patrick
    Horn, Lars-Christian
    Stolzenburg, Jens-Uwe
    Kahn, Thomas
    Moche, Michael
    Busse, Harald
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (05) : 599 - 605