Clinical feasibility of MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsies at 0.55T

被引:0
|
作者
Kaur, Tejinder [1 ]
Jiang, Yun [1 ]
Seiberlich, Nicole [1 ]
Hussain, Hero [1 ]
Wells, Shane [1 ]
Wei, John [1 ]
Caoili, Elaine [1 ]
Gulani, Vikas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Prostate biopsy; MRI; Prostate cancer; Transrectal; Percutaneous; In-bore; ULTRASOUND FUSION; STRATEGIES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04783-x
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
ObjectiveIn-bore MRI-guided biopsy allows direct visualization of suspicious lesions, biopsy needles, and trajectories, allowing accurate sampling when MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy is not feasible. However, its use has been limited. Wide-bore, lower-field, and lower-cost scanners could help address these issues, but their feasibility for prostate biopsy is unknown. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the feasibility of in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy using a large-bore (80 cm), 0.55T scanner.Materials and methodsNineteen participants (68 +/- 10 years) with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) were recruited for this Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved study (May 2023 -October 2024). Prebiopsy diagnostic scans and intra-procedural T2-weighted images were used for lesion localization. PSA levels, lesion sizes, cancer detection rates, positive core volume percentage, ISUP (International Society of Urological Pathology) grade groups (GG), positive volume cores, skin to target distances, and procedure durations were reported.ResultsSeventeen participants underwent biopsies (four transrectal, thirteen percutaneous). Two participants were excluded. Twenty lesions (mean size 1.9 +/- 1.2 cm) were biopsied which showed various GG cancers (GG1, GG2, GG3, GG4, and GG5), with positive cores ranging from 10 to 100%. 20% of the lesions were benign. Compared to previous biopsies, 22.2% (2/9) had new cancer detections, 22.2% (2/9) showed a GG upgrade, and 33.3% (3/9) had increased positive core volume, while 11.1% (1/9) showed no upgrade and 11.1% (1/9) had benign findings. Among biopsy-na & iuml;ve participants, 75% (6/8) had cancer detected, and 25% (2/8) had benign findings. One new cancer was detected near a hip prosthesis due to reduced imaging artifacts. Average total procedure time was 77 +/- 21 min for transrectal and 74 +/- 22 min for percutaneous biopsies, with times to first core at 45 +/- 15 and 53 +/- 14 min, respectively.ConclusionIdentifying and accurately targeting suspicious prostate lesions is feasible using a 0.55T MRI scanner.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In-bore transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsies: Are there risk factors for complications?
    Meier-Schroers, Michael
    Homsi, Rami
    Kukuk, Guido
    Wolter, Karsten
    Decker, Georges
    Fischer, Stefan
    Marx, Christian
    Schmeel, Frederic Carsten
    Block, Wolfgang
    Sprinkart, Alois Martin
    Traeber, Frank
    Schild, Hans Heinz
    Willinek, Winfried
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (12) : 2169 - 2173
  • [2] Enabling In-Bore MRI-Guided Biopsies With Force Feedback
    Frishman, Samuel
    Kight, Ali
    Pirozzi, Ileana
    Coffey, Mela C.
    Daniel, Bruce L.
    Cutkosky, Mark R.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON HAPTICS, 2020, 13 (01) : 159 - 166
  • [3] Comparison of analgesic techniques in MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy
    Quentin, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Ullrich, T.
    Valentin, B.
    Hiester, A.
    Blondin, D.
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 6965 - 6970
  • [4] Comparison of analgesic techniques in MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy
    M. Quentin
    C. Arsov
    T. Ullrich
    B. Valentin
    A. Hiester
    D. Blondin
    P. Albers
    G. Antoch
    L. Schimmöller
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 6965 - 6970
  • [5] In-bore setup and software for 3T MRI-guided transperineal prostate biopsy
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Iordachita, Iulian
    Song, Sang-Eun
    Fedorov, Andriy
    Oguro, Sota
    Lasso, Andras
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Hata, Nobuhiko
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (18): : 5823 - 5840
  • [6] Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard
    Schimmoeller, L.
    Quentin, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Lanzman, R. S.
    Hiester, A.
    Rabenalt, R.
    Antoch, G.
    Albers, P.
    Blondin, D.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (11) : 3185 - 3190
  • [7] Inter-reader agreement of the ESUR score for prostate MRI using in-bore MRI-guided biopsies as the reference standard
    L. Schimmöller
    M. Quentin
    C. Arsov
    R. S. Lanzman
    A. Hiester
    R. Rabenalt
    G. Antoch
    P. Albers
    D. Blondin
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 3185 - 3190
  • [8] MRI-guided in-bore biopsy of the prostate - defining the optimal number of cores needed
    Gross, Moritz
    Eisenhuber, Edith
    Assinger, Petra
    Schima, Raphael
    Susani, Martin
    Doblhammer, Stefan
    Schima, Wolfgang
    CANCER IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [9] Open Source Platform for Transperineal In-Bore MRI-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Herz, Christian
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Fedorov, Andriy
    MacNeil, Kyle
    Behringer, Peter A.
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Mehrtash, Alireza
    Mousavi, Parvin
    Kikinis, Ron
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 67 (02) : 565 - 576
  • [10] Design of an MRI-Compatible Modularized Needle Driver for In-Bore MRI-Guided Prostate Interventions
    Kim, Ki-Young
    Li, Meng
    Gonenc, Berk
    Shang, Weijian
    Eslami, Sohrab
    Iordachita, Iulian
    2015 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS (ICCAS), 2015, : 1520 - 1525