Validation of the 10-Item Social Provision Scale (SPS-10): Evaluating Factor Structure, Reliability, Measurement Invariance, and Nomological Network Across 38 Countries

被引:1
作者
Sischka, Philipp E. [1 ]
Albert, Isabelle [1 ]
Kornadt, Anna E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
关键词
Social Provision Scale (SPS-10); social support; psychometric properties; dimensionality; reliability; measurement invariance; cross-cultural research; item response theory; MEASUREMENT ERROR; CULTURAL-DIVERSITY; TEST INFORMATION; EQUATION MODELS; SUPPORT; ATTENUATION; PERSONALITY; POPULATION; CONSTRUCT; INDEXES;
D O I
10.1177/10731911241283609
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The 24-item Social Provision Scale is among the most frequently used self-report scales to assess perceived social support. A shortened 10-item version (SPS-10) with promising psychometric properties has been proposed. However, so far only a few studies in specific cultural contexts investigated its psychometric properties. Thus, the aim of the current study was an extensive investigation of the psychometric properties of the SPS-10 among 38 countries (N = 88,857 respondents) using the COVIDiSTRESS Global Survey data. Item response theory bifactor analysis revealed that the general factor accounts for the largest part of the covariance among the items in all countries (explained common variance >= .75) and that the mean/sum score of the SPS-10 can be used as a total score of perceived general social support. Reliability was high for all countries (rho unidimensional GRM >= .89). Measurement invariance and differential item/test functioning analysis of the unidimensional graded response model indicated negligible differential test functioning across countries. The association with the external criteria mainly supported its construct validity. The SPS-10 is a psychometrically sound measure of perceived social support for large-scale cross-cultural studies.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Multiple Group Alignment for Exploratory and Structural Equation Models [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2023, 30 (02) :169-191
[2]   Multiple-Group Factor Analysis Alignment [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2014, 21 (04) :495-508
[3]   The Five Factor Model of personality and social support: A meta-analysis [J].
Baranczuk, Urszula .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2019, 81 :38-46
[4]   DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN SOCIAL SUPPORT CONCEPTS, MEASURES, AND MODELS [J].
BARRERA, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 14 (04) :413-445
[5]   THE NEED TO BELONG - DESIRE FOR INTERPERSONAL ATTACHMENTS AS A FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN-MOTIVATION [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
LEARY, MR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 117 (03) :497-529
[6]   On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests [J].
Boer, Diana ;
Hanke, Katja ;
He, Jia .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 49 (05) :713-734
[7]   Incorporating the Cultural Diversity of Family and Close Relationships Into the Study of Health [J].
Campos, Belinda ;
Kim, Heejung S. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2017, 72 (06) :543-554
[8]   A validation of the Social Provisions Scale: the SPS-10 items [J].
Caron, Jean .
SANTE MENTALE AU QUEBEC, 2013, 38 (01) :297-318
[9]   Model-Based Measures for Detecting and Quantifying Response Bias [J].
Chalmers, R. Philip .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 2018, 83 (03) :696-732
[10]  
Chalmers RP, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V48, P1