Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey

被引:0
|
作者
Bang, Chohee [1 ]
Kwak, Jae-Jin [2 ]
机构
[1] Honam Univ, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Gwangju, South Korea
[2] Seoul Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, Div Cardiol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
NURSING OPEN | 2025年 / 12卷 / 03期
关键词
cardiac patients; factor analysis; ICD acceptance; implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD); Korean version; nursing; patient adaptation; psychological well-being; reliability; validation; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HEALTH-STATUS; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1002/nop2.70177
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim: To validate the Korean version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey (K-FPAS) and assess its reliability in evaluating the acceptance of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) among Korean patients. Design: A methodological research study was conducted to develop and validate the K-FPAS as a valuable tool for assessing ICD acceptance and its related factors in the Korean patient population. Methods: A total of 243 participants, aged 18 years and older, who had received ICDs within the past year and were regularly monitored by cardiac specialists, were included in the study. The K-FPAS was meticulously translated and underwent expert validation, exploratory factor analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis to establish its construct validity. Content validity was confirmed by seven experts, and concurrent validity was examined using the Short Form-36 Health Survey. The reliability of the K-FPAS was assessed for internal consistency. Results: The K-FPAS demonstrated robust content and construct validity, consisting of 15 items organised into four subdomains: "Return to Life," "Device-Related Distress," "Positive Appraisal," and "Body Image Concerns." Conclusion: The K-FPAS is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating ICD acceptance among Korean patients. It provides a robust methodological framework for exploring the multidimensional facets of ICD acceptance, particularly highlighting the significance of psychological and emotional well-being. This tool demonstrates considerable potential for advancing nursing research and guiding evidence-based interventions to enhance ICD acceptance and improve the overall quality of life for ICD recipients. Patient or Public Contribution: Patients contributed to this study by providing responses on the study questionnaires, and five hospitals supported the data collection process by providing suitable facilities for interviews and questionnaires. This research aims to benefit patients and improve their well-being through better ICD acceptance assessment and support.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey
    Umeda, Aya
    Mizuno, So
    Suzuki, Makoto
    Iizuka, Hiromi
    JOURNAL OF NURSING MEASUREMENT, 2022, 30 (02) : 300 - 313
  • [2] Validity and reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Florida Patient Acceptance Survey for patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Silva, Katia Regina
    Costa, Roberto
    Rebustini, Flavio
    Melo, Giovanna Regina Garcia de Oliveira
    Saucedo, Sarah Caroline Martins
    Sears, Samuel
    METHODSX, 2023, 11
  • [3] Reliability and Validity of Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptom Survey, Korean Version
    Yang, Su-Young
    Kang, Weechang
    Yeo, Yoon
    Park, Yang-Chun
    JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 21 (05) : 313 - 318
  • [4] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
    Kim, Minju
    Lee, Yerim
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE NURSING, 2021, 53 (01) : 49 - 54
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the coronary revascularization outcome questionnaire
    Kim, Minju
    Seo, JiYeong
    Hwang, Jin-Yong
    Park, Ki Soo
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2017, 15
  • [6] The Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of Readiness for Practice Survey for Nursing Students
    Lee, Tae Wha
    Ji, Yoonjung
    Yoon, Yea Seul
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF NURSING, 2022, 52 (06) : 564 - 581
  • [7] Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire
    Lee, Jun Ho
    Ki, Minjong
    Choi, Seungseo
    Woo, Cheol Jong
    Kim, Deokkyu
    Lim, Hyungsun
    Kim, Dong-Chan
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 74 (02) : 142 - 149
  • [8] Validity and reliability of a Korean version of the breast cancer survivors resilience scale
    Kim, Jung Min
    Choi, Jin Hyuk
    Han, Jeong-Won
    JAPAN JOURNAL OF NURSING SCIENCE, 2020, 17 (03)
  • [9] Reliability and Validity of a Korean Version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire
    Kwon, Jae-Woo
    Moon, Ji-Yong
    Kim, Sae-Hoon
    Song, Woo-Jung
    Kim, Min-Hye
    Kang, Min-Gyu
    Lim, Kyung-Hwan
    Lee, So-Hee
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jin Young
    Kwon, Hyouk-Soo
    Kim, Kyung-Mook
    Kim, Sang-Heon
    Kim, Sang-Hoon
    Jeong, Jae-Won
    Kim, Cheol-Woo
    Cho, Sang-Heon
    Lee, Byung-Jae
    ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 7 (03) : 230 - 233
  • [10] Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Gout Impact Scale
    Kim, Min Jung
    Kim, Ju Yeon
    Lee, Jennifer Jooha
    Moon, Ki Won
    Shin, Kichul
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (35)