Disparities in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Nguyen, Antoinette [1 ]
Chon, Jeewon [2 ]
Coles, Brigid [3 ]
Galiano, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Rochester, NY USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60208 USA
关键词
INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR; SPARING MASTECTOMY; FLAP; HEALTH; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/jso.28014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in Southeast Asia. However, significant disparities in access to postmastectomy breast reconstruction persist due to cultural, economic, and healthcare-related factors. These disparities result in unequal access to care, impacting patient outcomes, and overall quality of life. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to assess trends, disparities, and outcomes in breast reconstruction across Southeast Asia. The review included 15 studies published between 2000 and 2023 from countries including Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Brunei. Data extracted focused on disparities related to ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis included summarizing key variables across studies. Significant cultural and economic barriers to breast reconstruction were identified. Cultural beliefs influenced uptake, with Malay women preferring autologous tissue reconstruction (92.3%), while Chinese women had lower reconstruction rates due to traditional beliefs. Economic constraints limited access to advanced techniques like the DIEP flap, which had a median cost of SGD 11 009.38, significantly higher than the TRAM flap (SGD, 300.51, p < 0.001). Geographic disparities further restricted access, especially in rural areas. Complication rates were higher in obese patients, with total flap loss at 6% and fat necrosis at 10%. Studies from Vietnam and Thailand reported 5-year overall survival rates of 95% and disease-free survival rates of 80.7% for early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing reconstruction. Breast reconstruction disparities in Southeast Asia are driven by complex interactions between cultural, economic, and healthcare-related factors. Efforts to reduce these disparities must focus on increasing patient education, expanding reconstructive options, and addressing systemic healthcare inequalities. Targeted interventions, including policy changes to subsidize reconstruction and improve surgeon training in rural areas, are critical to ensuring equitable access and improving patient outcomes across the region.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY
    PINOTTI, JA
    KEPPKE, EM
    TEIXEIRA, LC
    ADVANCES IN GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS SERIES, VOL 3: GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 1989, : 123 - 132
  • [42] BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY
    KRAG, C
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1988, 27 (6A) : 687 - 690
  • [43] BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY
    LUCE, EA
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1983, 76 (02) : 190 - 193
  • [44] BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY
    HURWITZ, PJ
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1981, 17 (9-10): : 980 - 983
  • [45] Breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Quoc, C. Ho
    Delay, E.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2013, 42 (01): : 29 - 39
  • [46] Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy
    Schmauss, Daniel
    Machens, Hans-Guenther
    Harder, Yves
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2016, 2
  • [47] RECONSTRUCTION OF BREAST AFTER MASTECTOMY
    CRONIN, TD
    UPTON, J
    MCDONOUGH, JM
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1977, 59 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [48] BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY
    WOODS, JE
    SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1980, 150 (06): : 869 - 874
  • [49] Breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Rayter, Z.
    Wilson, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (12) : 1577 - 1578
  • [50] Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy
    Roje, Zdravko
    Roje, Zeljka
    Jankovic, Stipan
    Ninkovic, Milomir
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2010, 34 : 113 - 123