Disparities in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Nguyen, Antoinette [1 ]
Chon, Jeewon [2 ]
Coles, Brigid [3 ]
Galiano, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Rochester, NY USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60208 USA
关键词
INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR; SPARING MASTECTOMY; FLAP; HEALTH; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/jso.28014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in Southeast Asia. However, significant disparities in access to postmastectomy breast reconstruction persist due to cultural, economic, and healthcare-related factors. These disparities result in unequal access to care, impacting patient outcomes, and overall quality of life. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to assess trends, disparities, and outcomes in breast reconstruction across Southeast Asia. The review included 15 studies published between 2000 and 2023 from countries including Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Brunei. Data extracted focused on disparities related to ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis included summarizing key variables across studies. Significant cultural and economic barriers to breast reconstruction were identified. Cultural beliefs influenced uptake, with Malay women preferring autologous tissue reconstruction (92.3%), while Chinese women had lower reconstruction rates due to traditional beliefs. Economic constraints limited access to advanced techniques like the DIEP flap, which had a median cost of SGD 11 009.38, significantly higher than the TRAM flap (SGD, 300.51, p < 0.001). Geographic disparities further restricted access, especially in rural areas. Complication rates were higher in obese patients, with total flap loss at 6% and fat necrosis at 10%. Studies from Vietnam and Thailand reported 5-year overall survival rates of 95% and disease-free survival rates of 80.7% for early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing reconstruction. Breast reconstruction disparities in Southeast Asia are driven by complex interactions between cultural, economic, and healthcare-related factors. Efforts to reduce these disparities must focus on increasing patient education, expanding reconstructive options, and addressing systemic healthcare inequalities. Targeted interventions, including policy changes to subsidize reconstruction and improve surgeon training in rural areas, are critical to ensuring equitable access and improving patient outcomes across the region.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breast reconstruction after therapeutic or prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer: A comparison of guideline recommendations
    Popowich, Brittany
    Kostaras, Xanthoula
    Temple-Oberle, Claire
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (06): : 1046 - 1051
  • [32] Implant Breast Reconstruction After Salvage Mastectomy in Previously Irradiated Patients
    Persichetti, Paolo
    Cagli, Barbara
    Simone, Pierfranco
    Cogliandro, Annalisa
    Fortunato, Lucio
    Altomare, Vittorio
    Trodella, Lucio
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2009, 62 (04) : 350 - 354
  • [33] Effect of Radiotherapy on the Type and Timing of Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients
    Citgez, Bulent
    Yigit, Banu
    Capkinoglu, Buse
    Altinkaya, Altug
    MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL, 2024, 58 (04): : 401 - 410
  • [34] Racial Disparities in the Cost of Unplanned Hospitalizations after Breast Reconstruction
    Nasser, Jacob S.
    Billig, Jessica I.
    Wang, Chang
    Wang, Lu
    Chung, Kevin C.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 152 (02) : 281 - 290
  • [35] Cancer disparities in Southeast Asia: intersectionality and a call to action
    Feliciano, Erin Jay G.
    Ho, Frances Dominique V.
    Yee, Kaisin
    Paguio, Joseph A.
    Eala, Michelle Ann B.
    Robredo, Janine Patricia G.
    Ng, Kenrick
    Lim, Jasmine
    Pyone, Khin Thuzar
    Peralta, Catherine A.
    Flores, Jerickson Abbie
    Yao, J. Seth
    Santos, Patricia Mae G.
    Ang, Christian Daniel U.
    Lasco, Gideon
    Chan, Jeffrey Shi Kai
    Tse, Gary
    Tangco, Enrico D.
    Kingham, T. Peter
    Chitapanarux, Imjai
    Bhoo-Pathy, Nirmala
    Legaspi, Gerardo D.
    Dee, Edward Christopher
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2023, 41
  • [36] The musculoskeletal consequences of breast reconstruction using the latissimus dorsi muscle for women following mastectomy for breast cancer: A critical review
    Blackburn, N. E.
    Mc Veigh, J. G.
    Mc Caughan, E.
    Wilson, I. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2018, 27 (02)
  • [37] The current state of tranexamic acid in mastectomy and breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fung, Ethan
    Godek, Maxwell
    Roth, Jacquelyn M.
    Montalmant, Keisha E.
    Yu, Bernice Z.
    Henderson, Peter W.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 104 : 259 - 272
  • [38] Patient-reported upper extremity impairment following mastectomy with breast reconstruction: A systematic review
    Carr, Hannah
    Gonzalez, Miguel
    Shubeck, Sarah
    Beederman, Maureen R.
    Maassen, Nicholas H.
    Hanson, Summer E.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 103 : 233 - 247
  • [39] Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Soteropulos, Carol E.
    Tang, Sherry Y. Q.
    Poore, Samuel O.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2019, 35 (09) : 695 - 704
  • [40] Breast Malignancies After Mastectomy With Autologous or Implant Reconstruction
    Portnow, Leah H.
    Majid, Sana
    Maduram, Amy
    Chesebro, Allyson L.
    Karimova, E. Jane
    Chung, Stephanie H.
    Gombos, Eva C.
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2022, 4 (06) : 649 - 660