Disparities in Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Nguyen, Antoinette [1 ]
Chon, Jeewon [2 ]
Coles, Brigid [3 ]
Galiano, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Sch Med & Dent, Rochester, NY USA
[2] Loyola Univ, Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60208 USA
关键词
INFERIOR EPIGASTRIC PERFORATOR; SPARING MASTECTOMY; FLAP; HEALTH; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/jso.28014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in Southeast Asia. However, significant disparities in access to postmastectomy breast reconstruction persist due to cultural, economic, and healthcare-related factors. These disparities result in unequal access to care, impacting patient outcomes, and overall quality of life. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to assess trends, disparities, and outcomes in breast reconstruction across Southeast Asia. The review included 15 studies published between 2000 and 2023 from countries including Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, and Brunei. Data extracted focused on disparities related to ethnicity, socioeconomic status, geographic location, and surgical outcomes. Statistical analysis included summarizing key variables across studies. Significant cultural and economic barriers to breast reconstruction were identified. Cultural beliefs influenced uptake, with Malay women preferring autologous tissue reconstruction (92.3%), while Chinese women had lower reconstruction rates due to traditional beliefs. Economic constraints limited access to advanced techniques like the DIEP flap, which had a median cost of SGD 11 009.38, significantly higher than the TRAM flap (SGD, 300.51, p < 0.001). Geographic disparities further restricted access, especially in rural areas. Complication rates were higher in obese patients, with total flap loss at 6% and fat necrosis at 10%. Studies from Vietnam and Thailand reported 5-year overall survival rates of 95% and disease-free survival rates of 80.7% for early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing reconstruction. Breast reconstruction disparities in Southeast Asia are driven by complex interactions between cultural, economic, and healthcare-related factors. Efforts to reduce these disparities must focus on increasing patient education, expanding reconstructive options, and addressing systemic healthcare inequalities. Targeted interventions, including policy changes to subsidize reconstruction and improve surgeon training in rural areas, are critical to ensuring equitable access and improving patient outcomes across the region.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Life quality of patients who underwent breast reconstruction after prophylactic mastectomy: systematic review
    Aygin, Dilek
    Cengiz, Hande
    BREAST CANCER, 2018, 25 (05) : 497 - 505
  • [12] Higher Risk of Depression After Total Mastectomy Versus Breast Reconstruction Among Adult Women With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metaregression
    Padmalatha, Sriyani
    Tsai, Yi-Tseng
    Ku, Han-Chang
    Wu, Yi-Lin
    Yu, Tsung
    Fang, Su-Ying
    Ko, Nai-Ying
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2021, 21 (05) : E526 - E538
  • [13] Histologic Examination of Mastectomy Scars during Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Berger, Ori
    Talisman, Ran
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [14] Breast Sensation after Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Shridharani, Sachin M.
    Magarakis, Michael
    Stapleton, Sahael M.
    Basdag, Basak
    Seal, Stella M.
    Rosson, Gedge D.
    JOURNAL OF RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2010, 26 (05) : 303 - 310
  • [15] Breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy in the large and/or ptotic breast: A systematic review of indications, techniques, and outcomes
    Tondu, Thierry
    Hubens, Guy
    Tjalma, Wiebren A. A.
    Thiessen, Filip E. F.
    Vrints, Ina
    Van Thielen, Jana
    Verhoeven, Veronique
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2020, 73 (03) : 469 - 485
  • [16] Mastectomy skin necrosis after microsurgical breast reconstruction
    Vargas, Christina R.
    Koolen, Pieter G.
    Anderson, Katarina E.
    Paul, Marek A.
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Lin, Samuel J.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 198 (02) : 530 - 534
  • [17] Stalled at the intersection: insurance status and disparities in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction
    Friedman-Eldar, Orli
    Burke, Jonathan
    Silva, Iago de Castro
    Baumrucker, Camille C.
    Valle, Fernando
    Lessard, Anne-Sophie
    Kassira, Wrood
    Franceschi, Dido
    Kesmodel, Susan B.
    Avisar, Eli
    Goel, Neha
    Moller, Mecker G.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 194 (02) : 327 - 335
  • [18] Disparities in Reconstruction Rates After Mastectomy: Patterns of Care and Factors Associated with the Use of Breast Reconstruction in Southern California
    Kruper, Laura
    Holt, Alicia
    Xu, Xin Xin
    Duan, Lei
    Henderson, Katherine
    Bernstein, Leslie
    Ellenhorn, Joshua
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (08) : 2158 - 2165
  • [19] Current Trends in Breast Reconstruction following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy
    Hu, Vivian J.
    McCleary, Sean P.
    Smullin, Carolyn P.
    Morales, Ricardo Rosales
    Da Lio, Andrew L.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (04) : E4277
  • [20] Perioperative protocols in ambulatory breast reconstruction: A systematic review
    Rourke, Kaitlyn
    Halyk, Laura Jane
    Macneil, Jenna
    Malic, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2023, 85 : 252 - 263