Forecasting drought using machine learning: a systematic literature review

被引:2
作者
Oyarzabal, Ricardo S. [1 ]
Santos, Leonardo B. L. [1 ]
Cunningham, Christopher [1 ]
Broedel, Elisangela [1 ]
de Lima, Glauston R. T. [1 ]
Cunha-Zeri, Gisleine [2 ]
Peixoto, Jerusa S. [1 ]
Anochi, Juliana A. [2 ]
Garcia, Klaifer [1 ]
Costa, Lidiane C. O. [1 ]
Pampuch, Luana A. [3 ]
Cuartas, Luz Adriana [1 ]
Zeri, Marcelo [1 ]
Guedes, Marcia R. G. [1 ]
Negri, Rogerio G. [3 ]
Munoz, Viviana A. [1 ]
Cunha, Ana Paula M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Ctr Monitoring & Early Warning Nat Disasters, BR-12247016 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[2] Natl Inst Space Res INPE, BR-12227010 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[3] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, BR-12247016 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
关键词
Machine learning; Drought forecasting; Climate change; Systematic literature review; LEVEL; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-025-07195-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The number of reported drought events per year and their impacts have significantly increased in the last two decades. In addition to monitoring drought conditions, forecasting is essential for planning activities. Various Machine Learning (ML) algorithms have experienced a substantial increase in popularity in geoscience applications. This study presents a Systematic Literature Review on drought forecasting utilizing Machine Learning models. Following the PRISMA 2020 protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), the total number of papers was reduced from approximately a thousand to a hundred. The majority of the papers found study areas from Asia and Oceania. Meteorological drought was the most studied event in the articles evaluated due to the greater ease of its estimation using only rainfall data. The Standardized Precipitation Index and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index are the most widely used indices in research relating to drought and Machine Learning. Precipitation is the most commonly used input among the various input data used in ML models. Remote sensing has yet to be widely used in drought forecasting, with less than 20% of papers utilizing remote sensing data. What still needs to be addressed is drought forecasting in the time scale of days, which is less utilized compared to the monthly scale. The regression method is the most commonly used, with 77% of papers utilizing it. In conclusion, we formulated five recommendations based on the critical evidence and insights from our review: (1) it is essential to foster interdisciplinary collaborations among experts in ML, climatology, and hydrology while investing in initiatives that promote the sharing of data and code repositories; (2) satellite remote sensing technologies and crowd-sourced data collection methods should be considered in ML studies while enhancing existing monitoring infrastructure to increase the spatial and temporal coverage of datasets for validation of ML methods; (3) it is recommended to increase the availability of additional environmental variables, such as soil moisture and vegetation health, to promote more studies of agricultural drought and ML methods; (4) it is crucial to prioritize the integration of daily-scale climate data into drought modeling and forecasting for developing effective adaptation and mitigation measures to flash drought events; and finally (5) ethical considerations of using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for drought forecasting, emphasizing the environmental impact, issues of digital sovereignty, and the urgent need for a broader dialogue on AI's role in sustainable climate solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:9823 / 9851
页数:29
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Assessment and prediction of index based agricultural drought vulnerability using machine learning algorithms [J].
Abdulla-Al Kafy ;
Bakshi, Arpita ;
Saha, Milan ;
Al Faisal, Abdullah ;
Almulhim, Abdulaziz I. ;
Rahaman, Zullyadini A. ;
Mohammad, Pir .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 867
[2]   Remote sensing of drought: Progress, challenges and opportunities [J].
AghaKouchak, A. ;
Farahmand, A. ;
Melton, F. S. ;
Teixeira, J. ;
Anderson, M. C. ;
Wardlow, B. D. ;
Hain, C. R. .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2015, 53 (02) :452-480
[3]   Leveraging machine learning algorithms in dynamic modeling of urban expansion, surface heat islands, and carbon storage for sustainable environmental management in coastal ecosystems [J].
Al Kafy, Abdulla ;
Dey, Nataraj Narayan ;
Saha, Milan ;
Altuwaijri, Hamad Ahmed ;
Fattah, Md. Abdul ;
Rahaman, Zullyadini A. ;
Kalaivani, S. ;
Bakshi, Arpita ;
Rahaman, Sk Nafiz .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 370
[4]   Unraveling the spatiotemporal dynamics of relative humidity in major Saudi Arabian cities: A synergy of climate modeling, regression analysis, and wavelet coherence [J].
Al-Ramadan, Baqer ;
Aldosary, Adel S. ;
Kafy, Abdulla Al ;
Alsulamy, Saleh ;
Rahaman, Zullyadini A. .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2024, 155 (08) :7909-7935
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Disasters in Numbers
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, AR6 SYNTHESIS REPORT
[7]  
[Anonymous], British Medical Journal, DOI 10.1136/bmj-2022-072348.BMJ
[8]   The quasi-biennial oscillation [J].
Baldwin, MP ;
Gray, LJ ;
Dunkerton, TJ ;
Hamilton, K ;
Haynes, PH ;
Randel, WJ ;
Holton, JR ;
Alexander, MJ ;
Hirota, I ;
Horinouchi, T ;
Jones, DBA ;
Kinnersley, JS ;
Marquardt, C ;
Sato, K ;
Takahashi, M .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2001, 39 (02) :179-229
[9]   A review of drought monitoring with big data: Issues, methods, challenges and research directions [J].
Balti, Hanen ;
Ben Abbes, Ali ;
Mellouli, Nedra ;
Farah, Imed Riadh ;
Sang, Yanfang ;
Lamolle, Myriam .
ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 60
[10]   Cooperative adaptive management of the Nile River with climate and socio-economic uncertainties [J].
Basheer, Mohammed ;
Nechifor, Victor ;
Calzadilla, Alvaro ;
Gebrechorkos, Solomon ;
Pritchard, David ;
Forsythe, Nathan ;
Gonzalez, Jose M. ;
Sheffield, Justin ;
Fowler, Hayley J. ;
Harou, Julien J. .
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 13 (01) :48-+