The use of simulations in economic cybersecurity decision-making

被引:0
作者
Kianpour, Mazaher [1 ,2 ]
Franke, Ulrik [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Informat Secur & Commun Technol, Hgsk Ringen 1, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[2] RISE Res Inst Sweden, POB 1263, SE-16429 Kista, Sweden
[3] Swedish Def Univ, POB 27805, SE-11593 Stockholm, Sweden
[4] KTH Royal Inst Technol, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
来源
JOURNAL OF CYBERSECURITY | 2025年 / 11卷 / 01期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
simulations; economics; decision-making under risk; decision-making under uncertainty; bias; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; BOUNDARY OBJECTS; CYBER RISK; AWARENESS; MODELS; PROFESSIONALS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1093/cybsec/tyaf003
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This paper presents an in-depth examination of the use of simulations in economic cybersecurity decision-making, highlighting the dual nature of their potential and the challenges they present. Drawing on examples from existing studies, we explore the role of simulations in generating new knowledge about probabilities and consequences in the cybersecurity domain, which is essential in understanding and managing risk and uncertainty. Additionally, we introduce the concepts of "bookkeeping" and "abstraction" within the context of simulations, discussing how they can sometimes fail and exploring the underlying reasons for their failures. This discussion leads us to suggest a framework of considerations for effectively utilizing simulations in cybersecurity. This framework is designed not as a rigid checklist but as a guide for critical thinking and evaluation, aiding users in assessing the suitability and reliability of a simulation model for a particular decision-making context. Future work should focus on applying this framework in real-world settings, continuously refining the use of simulations to ensure they remain effective and relevant in the dynamic field of cybersecurity.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contingency in Economic Decision-making
    Ticha, Milena
    CONTINGENCY IN THE EDUCATION, ART AND SPORT, 2017, : 120 - 129
  • [2] Time and Economic Decision-making
    Ticha, Milena
    TIME IN THE EDUCATION, ART AND SPORT: INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONFERENCE, 2014, : 107 - 116
  • [3] Investment decision-making under economic policy uncertainty
    Jackson, Cath
    Orr, Allison
    JOURNAL OF PROPERTY RESEARCH, 2019, 36 (02) : 153 - 185
  • [4] Use of Artificial Intelligence in Regulatory Decision-Making
    Jago, Robert
    Gaag, Anna van der
    Stathis, Kostas
    Petej, Ivan
    Lertvittayakumjorn, Piyawat
    Krishnamurthy, Yamuna
    Gao, Yang
    Silva, Juan Caceres
    Webster, Michelle
    Gallagher, Ann
    Austin, Zubin
    JOURNAL OF NURSING REGULATION, 2021, 12 (03) : 11 - 19
  • [5] Economic Decision-Making Using Rough Topological Structures
    El-Gayar, M. A.
    Abu-Gdairi, R.
    El-Bably, M. K.
    Taher, D. I.
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2023, 2023
  • [6] How to Effectively Use Economic Decision-Making Tools in Project Environments and Project Life Cycle
    Galli, Brian Joseph
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2020, 67 (03) : 932 - 940
  • [7] The use of the discrete Sugeno integral in decision-making: A survey
    Dubois, D
    Marichal, JL
    Prade, H
    Roubens, M
    Sabbadin, R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2001, 9 (05) : 539 - 561
  • [8] Student progress decision-making in programmatic assessment: can we extrapolate from clinical decision-making and jury decision-making?
    Tweed, Mike
    Wilkinson, Tim
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [9] Collective decision-making
    Bosel, Thomas
    Reinal, Andreagiovanni
    Marshall, James A. R.
    CURRENT OPINION IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2017, 16 : 30 - 34
  • [10] Threat of racial and economic inequality increases preference for algorithm decision-making
    Bigman, Yochanan E.
    Yam, Kai Chi
    Marciano, Deborah
    Reynolds, Scott J.
    Gray, Kurt
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2021, 122 (122)