Co-creation for public innovation: The role of living labs and user-engagement methodologies

被引:1
作者
Gago, David [1 ]
Rubalcaba, Luis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Econ Anal, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Alcala, Fac Econ Business and Tourism, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Co-creation; living labs (LLs); public innovation; public innovation outcomes; public value; surveys; user-engagement methodologies; users; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/09540962.2024.2425423
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Drawing on a survey of six European countries, this article examines how living labs (LLs) and user engagement methods influence public innovation outcomes. Based on econometric empirical evidence, the authors provide key insights for public sector managers at all levels (national, regional, local), emphasizing that active user involvement leads to better innovation outcomes, particularly those that go beyond the innovation process and influence how users perceive or benefit from public services (for example, by increasing user service quality). The authors recommend prioritizing value-creation functions that enable the most active user involvement methods based on co-creation over internal-focused processes. Additionally, they highlight the importance of supporting LLs as methodologically robust, sustainable, long-term innovation infrastructures, rather than tying them to short-term and limited resourcing projects. These conclusions are valid across different countries, varying sizes of public units, and levels of government (municipal or national). Public living labs (LLs) promote collaboration to tackle societal challenges. However, their success cannot be taken for granted, as user engagement methodologies matter. Drawing on data from a survey of six European countries, the article explores how LLs and user engagement methods are connected with public innovation outcomes. The authors conclude that methods with higher user involvement based on co-creation tend to produce better innovation outcomes, and the most relevant are those directly related to user experience versus cost or other internal-oriented outcomes. The conclusions hold across different countries, varying sizes of public units, and levels of government (municipal or national). The article also provides both policy implications when designing and implementing LLs in public sector, and managerial implications to promote effective public value creation in collaboration with users, citizens, or organizations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Co-creation - child, sibling or adopted cousin of open innovation?
    Tekic, Anja
    Willoughby, Kelvin
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 21 (02): : 274 - 297
  • [42] CO-CREATION WITH DIVERSE ACTORS FOR SUSTAINABILITY INNOVATION
    Sopjani, Liridona
    Hesselgren, Mia
    Ritzen, Sofia
    Stier, Janhager Jenny
    DS87-8 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN (ICED 17), VOL 8: HUMAN BEHAVIOUR IN DESIGN, 2017, : 459 - 468
  • [43] Ensuring Strong Public Support for Automation in the Planning Process: From Engagement to Co-creation
    Kaplan, Leah
    Rupprecht, Siegfried
    Grosso, Monica
    Thomopoulos, Nikolas
    Backhaus, Wolfgang
    Raposo, Maria Alonso
    Ciuffo, Biagio
    Franco, Daniel
    ROAD VEHICLE AUTOMATION 9, 2023, : 167 - 183
  • [44] Co-creation contributions for innovation and customer relations
    Wilches-Velasquez, Diana-Marcela
    SUMA DE NEGOCIOS, 2020, 11 (24) : 84 - 97
  • [45] Complexity in project co-creation of knowledge for innovation
    Ruoslahti, Harri
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2020, 5 (04): : 228 - 235
  • [46] Resonant co-creation as an approach to strategic innovation
    Rill, Bryan
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 29 (07) : 1135 - 1152
  • [47] Framework, principles and recommendations for utilising participatory methodologies in the co-creation and evaluation of public health interventions
    Leask C.F.
    Sandlund M.
    Skelton D.A.
    Altenburg T.M.
    Cardon G.
    Chinapaw M.J.M.
    De Bourdeaudhuij I.
    Verloigne M.
    Chastin S.F.M.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 5 (1)
  • [48] The role of staff engagement in facilitating staff-led value co-creation
    Merrilees, Bill
    Miller, Dale
    Yakimova, Raisa
    JOURNAL OF SERVICE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 28 (02) : 250 - 264
  • [49] Expect the Unexpected: Investigating co-creation projects in a Living Lab
    De Vita, Katharina
    De Vita, Riccardo
    TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 11 (9-10): : 6 - 20
  • [50] Enabling service innovation and firm performance: the role of co-creation and technological innovation in the hospitality industry
    Bhat, Dada Ab Rouf
    Sharma, Vivek
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2022, 34 (07) : 774 - 786