Co-creation for public innovation: The role of living labs and user-engagement methodologies

被引:1
作者
Gago, David [1 ]
Rubalcaba, Luis [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Fac Econ & Business, Dept Econ Anal, Madrid, Spain
[2] Univ Alcala, Fac Econ Business and Tourism, Dept Econ & Business Adm, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Co-creation; living labs (LLs); public innovation; public innovation outcomes; public value; surveys; user-engagement methodologies; users; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/09540962.2024.2425423
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Drawing on a survey of six European countries, this article examines how living labs (LLs) and user engagement methods influence public innovation outcomes. Based on econometric empirical evidence, the authors provide key insights for public sector managers at all levels (national, regional, local), emphasizing that active user involvement leads to better innovation outcomes, particularly those that go beyond the innovation process and influence how users perceive or benefit from public services (for example, by increasing user service quality). The authors recommend prioritizing value-creation functions that enable the most active user involvement methods based on co-creation over internal-focused processes. Additionally, they highlight the importance of supporting LLs as methodologically robust, sustainable, long-term innovation infrastructures, rather than tying them to short-term and limited resourcing projects. These conclusions are valid across different countries, varying sizes of public units, and levels of government (municipal or national). Public living labs (LLs) promote collaboration to tackle societal challenges. However, their success cannot be taken for granted, as user engagement methodologies matter. Drawing on data from a survey of six European countries, the article explores how LLs and user engagement methods are connected with public innovation outcomes. The authors conclude that methods with higher user involvement based on co-creation tend to produce better innovation outcomes, and the most relevant are those directly related to user experience versus cost or other internal-oriented outcomes. The conclusions hold across different countries, varying sizes of public units, and levels of government (municipal or national). The article also provides both policy implications when designing and implementing LLs in public sector, and managerial implications to promote effective public value creation in collaboration with users, citizens, or organizations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Climate services for tourism: An applied methodology for user engagement and co-creation in European destinations
    Barnet, Alba Font
    Ciurana, Anna Boque
    Pozo, Jon Xavier Olano
    Russo, Antonio
    Coscarelli, Roberto
    Antronico, Loredana
    De Pascale, Francesco
    Saladie, Oscar
    Anton-Clave, Salvador
    Aguilar, Enric
    CLIMATE SERVICES, 2021, 23
  • [32] MULTI-ACTOR ENGAGEMENT: AN OPEN INNOVATION PROCESS OF KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE AND CO-CREATION
    Franco, L.
    Justo, A.
    Cotelo, C.
    Arias, I
    Garrido, L.
    Lloret, L.
    Rodriguez-Aubo, N.
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF EDUCATION, RESEARCH AND INNOVATION (ICERI 2019), 2019, : 3808 - 3813
  • [33] Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study
    Correia Loureiro, Sandra Maria
    Romero, Jaime
    Bilro, Ricardo Godinho
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2020, 119 : 388 - 409
  • [34] Co-creation and community engagement in implementation research with vulnerable populations: a co-creation process in China
    Zhang, Liyuan
    Li, Katherine T.
    Wang, Tong
    Luo, Danyang
    Tan, Rayner K. J.
    Marley, Gifty
    Tang, Weiming
    Ramaswamy, Rohit
    Tucker, Joseph D.
    Wu, Dan
    SEXUAL HEALTH, 2024, 21 (06)
  • [35] The Psychological Mechanism of Brand Co-creation Engagement
    Hsieh, Sara H.
    Chang, Aihwa
    JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MARKETING, 2016, 33 : 13 - 26
  • [36] Living Labs for Public Sector Innovation: An Integrative Literature Review
    Fuglsang, Lars
    Hansen, Anne Vorre
    Mergel, Ines
    Rohnebaek, Maria Taivalsaari
    ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES, 2021, 11 (02)
  • [37] Co-creation and Design Thinking: an Experience of Innovation in Public Service in a Brazilian Municipality
    Schuch, Eduarda Montibeller
    Hoffmann, Micheline Gaia
    TEORIA E PRATICA EM ADMINISTRACAO-TPA, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [38] How does co-creation influence healthcare regulations? An analysis of co-creation in social innovation
    Tschumi, Pascal
    Mayer, Heike
    INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2024, 37 (01) : 85 - 117
  • [39] Knowledge Advancing Shopping Mall Living Labs and Customer Value Co-Creation, with a Focus on Social Integration
    Van Geenhuizen, Marina
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [40] Stakeholder salience in public sector value co-creation
    Best, Bernadette
    Moffett, Sandra
    McAdam, Rodney
    PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2019, 21 (11) : 1707 - 1732