Distinctive Delta and Theta Responses in Deductive and Probabilistic Reasoning

被引:0
作者
Sevim, Emir Faruk [1 ,2 ]
Yildirim, Yasin [3 ,4 ]
Unsal, Esra [1 ,2 ]
Dalmizrak, Esra [1 ,5 ]
Guntekin, Bahar [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Neurosci, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Res Inst Hlth Sci & Technol SABITA, Neurosci Res Ctr, Clinical Electrophysiol Neuroimaging & Neuromodula, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Istanbul Gedik Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy & Rehabil, Istanbul, Turkiye
[5] Mersin Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biophys, Mersin, Turkiye
[6] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biophys, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
conditional reasoning; deductive reasoning; electroencephalography; event-related oscillations; probabilistic reasoning; FRONTAL MIDLINE THETA; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; MENTAL MODELS; NEURAL BASIS; OSCILLATIONS;
D O I
10.1002/brb3.70179
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe neural substrates of reasoning, a cognitive ability we use constantly in daily life, are still unclear. Reasoning can be divided into two types according to how the inference process works and the certainty of the conclusions. In deductive reasoning, certain conclusions are drawn from premises by applying the rules of logic. On the other hand, in probabilistic reasoning, possible conclusions are drawn by interpreting the semantic content of arguments.MethodsWe examined event-related oscillations associated with deductive and probabilistic reasoning. To better represent the natural use of reasoning, we adopted a design that required participants to choose what type of reasoning they would use. Twenty healthy participants judged the truth values of alternative conclusion propositions following two premises while the EEG was being recorded. We then analyzed event-related delta and theta power and phase-locking induced under two different conditions.ResultsWe found that the reaction time was shorter and the accuracy rate was higher in deductive reasoning than in probabilistic reasoning. High delta and theta power in the temporoparietal, parietal, and occipital regions of the brain were observed in deductive reasoning. As for the probabilistic reasoning, prolonged delta response in the right hemisphere and high frontal theta phase-locking were noted.ConclusionOur results suggest that the electrophysiological signatures of the two types of reasoning have distinct characteristics. There are significant differences in the delta and theta responses that are associated with deductive and probabilistic reasoning. Although our findings suggest that deductive and probabilistic reasoning have different neural substrates, consistent with most of the studies in the literature, there is not yet enough evidence to make a comprehensive claim on the subject. There is a need to diversify the growing literature on deductive and probabilistic reasoning with different methods and experimental paradigms.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Multiple neural representations of elementary logical connectives [J].
Baggio, Giosue ;
Cherubini, Paolo ;
Pischedda, Doris ;
Blumenthal, Anna ;
Haynes, John-Dylan ;
Reverberi, Carlo .
NEUROIMAGE, 2016, 135 :300-310
[2]   Deduction electrified: ERPs elicited by the processing of words in conditional arguments [J].
Bonnefond, Mathilde ;
Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 124 (03) :244-256
[3]  
Braine MDS, 1998, MENTAL LOGIC, P79
[4]   Probabilistic and deductive reasoning in the human brain [J].
Castaneda, Lupita Estefania Gazzo ;
Sklarek, Benjamin ;
Dal Mas, Dennis E. ;
Knauff, Markus .
NEUROIMAGE, 2023, 275
[5]   Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control [J].
Cavanagh, James F. ;
Frank, Michael J. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (08) :414-421
[6]   Area-Specific Information Processing in Prefrontal Cortex during a Probabilistic Inference Task: A Multivariate fMRI BOLD Time Series Analysis [J].
Demanuele, Charmaine ;
Kirsch, Peter ;
Esslinger, Christine ;
Zink, Mathias ;
Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas ;
Durstewitz, Daniel .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (08)
[7]   Differential involvement of left prefrontal cortex in inductive and deductive reasoning [J].
Goel, V ;
Dolan, RJ .
COGNITION, 2004, 93 (03) :B109-B121
[8]   The seats of reason? An imaging study of deductive and inductive reasoning [J].
Goel, V ;
Gold, B ;
Kapur, S ;
Houle, S .
NEUROREPORT, 1997, 8 (05) :1305-1310
[9]   Anatomical segregation of component processes in an inductive inference task [J].
Goel, V ;
Dolan, RJ .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 12 (01) :110-119
[10]   Hemispheric specialization in human prefrontal cortex for resolving certain and uncertain inferences [J].
Goel, Vinod ;
Tierney, Michael ;
Sheesley, Laura ;
Bartolo, Angela ;
Vartanian, Oshin ;
Grafman, Jordan .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2007, 17 (10) :2245-2250