Comparative analysis of changes in spinal dimensions following different correction methods in adult spinal deformity surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Dinh, Hoai T. P. [1 ]
Ushirozako, Hiroki [1 ,2 ]
Hasegawa, Tomohiko [1 ,3 ]
Yamato, Yu [1 ]
Yoshida, Go [1 ]
Banno, Tomohiro [1 ,4 ]
Arima, Hideyuki [1 ]
Oe, Shin [1 ,4 ]
Yamada, Tomohiro [1 ]
Ide, Koichiro [1 ]
Kurosu, Kenta [1 ]
Matsuyama, Yukihiro [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamamatsu Univ Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hamamatsu, Japan
[2] Morimachi Publ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 391-1 Kusagaya, Mori, Shizuoka 4370214, Japan
[3] Hamamatsu Univ Sch Med, Div Geriatr Musculoskeletal Hlth, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
[4] Hamamatsu Univ Sch Med, Div Surg Care Morimachi, Hamamatsu, Japan
关键词
adult spinal deformity; lateral lumbar interbody fusion; multiple grade II osteotomies; three-dimensional; computed tomography; VERTEBRAL COLUMN DISTRACTION; INDIRECT DECOMPRESSION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; SCOLIOSIS; OSTEOTOMY; CORD;
D O I
10.1177/10225536241289313
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery has gained popularity, with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with multiple grade II osteotomies (PLIF + MOs) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) have been utilized to correct ASD; however, no studies have compared these methods with regard to the pre- and postoperative changes in length and volume of the spinal canal. This study aimed to investigate the 3-dimensional changes in the anterior vertical column length (AVCL), spinal canal length (SCL), and spinal canal volume (SCV) in patients with ASD after surgery, employing LLIF and PLIF + MOs. Methods: This retrospective study examined 44 patients with ASD who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2021 using two corrective surgical methods, LLIF and PLIF + MOs. Radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were assessed, and three-dimensional models were created from computed tomography images to analyze changes in AVCL, SCL, and SCV. Results: We compared the effects of LLIF and PLIF + MOs on spinal canal dimensions during ASD surgery. LLIF demonstrated an increase in lumbar segment (L1-S1) AVCL and whole spine (T1-S1) SCL by 6.5 +/- 8.0 mm and 13.8 +/- 7.6 mm, respectively, compared with PLIF + MOs. However, PLIF + MOs exhibited a reduction in the lengths of the lumbar segment AVCL. Postoperative differences were significant for AVCL (L1-S1), SCL fusion level, and first-standing lumbar lordosis between the groups (p < 0.0001, 0.002, and 0.016, respectively). LLIF significantly increased the SCV at the fusion level and whole spine T1-S1 by 14.5% and 10.6%, respectively, outperforming PLIF + MOs. Despite changes in dimensions, the postoperative Oswestry disability index scores showed no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study suggests that LLIF can increase spinal canal space, lumbar lordosis, and anterior column length in the lumbar spinal segment. Knowledge of these variations may be critical for enhancing surgical outcomes and preventing neurological complications.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of pelvic tilt correction on PJK occurrence after adult spinal deformity surgery
    Ponchelet, Louise
    Khalife, Marc
    Finoco, Mikael
    Duray, Cedric
    Guigui, Pierre
    Ferrero, Emmanuelle
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (05) : 1796 - 1806
  • [22] Posterior instrumented fusion surgery for adult spinal deformity: Correction rate and total balance
    Yamagata, Toru
    Chataigner, Herve
    Longis, Pierre-Marie
    Takami, Toshihiro
    Delecrin, Joel
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOVERTEBRAL JUNCTION AND SPINE, 2019, 10 (02) : 100 - 107
  • [23] Coronal Imbalance in Adult Spinal Deformity Following Posterior Spinal Fusion With Instrument A Related Parameters Analysis
    Zhang, Zifang
    Song, Kai
    Wu, Bing
    Chi, Pengfei
    Wang, Zhaohan
    Wang, Zheng
    SPINE, 2019, 44 (08) : 550 - 557
  • [24] Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Coronal Malalignment Following Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery (CMIS) for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction
    Tanasansomboon, Teerachat
    Khandehroo, Babak
    Limthongkul, Worawat
    Yingsakmongkol, Wicharn
    Anand, Neel
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [25] Neuromonitoring Changes in Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Kramer, Sterling
    Ford, Liz
    Walsh, Jed
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 55 (01) : 89 - 99
  • [26] Incidence and Predictive Factors of Sepsis Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    Lakomkin, Nikita
    Stannard, Blaine P.
    Hadjipanayis, Constantinos G.
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Smith, Justin S.
    Cheng, Joseph S.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (05) : 965 - 972
  • [27] Postoperative Recovery After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Scheer, Justin K.
    Mundis, Gregory M.
    Klineberg, Eric
    Hart, Robert A.
    Deviren, Vedat
    Nguyen, Stacie
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles S.
    Gupta, Munish
    Bess, Shay
    Shaffrey, Christopher I.
    Schwab, Frank
    Lafage, Virginie
    Smith, Justin S.
    Ames, Christopher P.
    SPINE, 2015, 40 (19) : 1505 - 1515
  • [28] Cost-Effectiveness in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Arutyunyan, Grigoriy G.
    Angevine, Peter D.
    Berven, Sigurd
    NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 83 (04) : 597 - 601
  • [29] Cost-Effectiveness of Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Alvarado, Anthony M.
    Schatmeyer, Bryan A.
    Arnold, Paul M.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 11 (1_SUPP) : 73S - 78S
  • [30] Incidence, Risk Factors, and Mortality of Reintubation in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Ramos, Rafael De la Garza
    Passias, Peter G.
    Schwab, Frank
    Bydon, Ali
    Lafage, Virginie
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2017, 30 (07): : E896 - E900