Action-based confidence sharing and collective decision making

被引:1
|
作者
Coucke, Nicolas [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Heinrich, Mary Katherine [2 ]
Dorigo, Marco [2 ]
Cleeremans, Axel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Ctr Res Cognit & Neurosci, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, IRIDIA, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Expt Psychol, Moral & Social Brain Lab, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
JOINT ACTION; BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; GOAL; MIND;
D O I
10.1016/j.isci.2024.111006
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Joint action research explores how multiple humans can coordinate their movements to achieve common goals. When there is uncertainty about the joint goal, individuals need to integrate their perceptual information of the environment to collaboratively determine their new goal. To ensure that a group reaches a consensus about the goal, collective decision making among the individuals is required. Collective decision making can be facilitated by nonverbal expressions of opinions and associated confidence levels. Here, we show that confidence sharing in groups of 2, 3, and 4 individuals can be studied using their trajectories when jointly moving toward one of several options. We found that both opinions and confidence levels can be distinguished in individual movement trajectories, and found that movement features can predict an individual's influence. Our results suggest that movement trajectories are a valid way to study confidence sharing in human collective decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ecolabels information and consumer self-confidence in decision making: a strategic imperative
    D'Souza, Clare
    Taghian, Mehdi
    Brouwer, Anne Renee
    JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MARKETING, 2021, 29 (02) : 141 - 157
  • [32] Relating Pupil Dilation and Metacognitive Confidence during Auditory Decision-Making
    Lempert, Karolina M.
    Chen, Yu Lin
    Fleming, Stephen M.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (05):
  • [33] It Takes Two to OЯTHO: A Tabletop Action-Based Embodied Design for the Cartesian System
    Katarzyna Potega vel Żabik
    Dor Abrahamson
    Ilona Iłowiecka-Tańska
    Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 2024, 10 (2) : 189 - 201
  • [34] Do action-based tasks evidence false-belief understanding in young children?
    Kammermeier, Marina
    Paulus, Markus
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 46 : 31 - 39
  • [35] Working Memory Guides Action Valuation in Model-based Decision-making Strategy
    Zuo, Zhaoyu
    Yang, Li-Zhuang
    Wang, Hongzhi
    Li, Hai
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2025, 37 (01) : 86 - 96
  • [36] Low-Level Corruption Tolerance: An "Action-Based" Approach for Peru and Latin America
    Alvarez, Joseph Pozsgai
    JOURNAL OF POLITICS IN LATIN AMERICA, 2015, 7 (02) : 99 - 129
  • [37] Multi-Criteria Decision Making Process in Metropolitan Transport Means Selection Based on the Sharing Mobility Idea
    Ciesla, Maria
    Sobota, Aleksander
    Jacyna, Marianna
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
  • [38] Negative Feedback Enables Fast and Flexible Collective Decision-Making in Ants
    Grueter, Christoph
    Schuerch, Roger
    Czaczkes, Tomer J.
    Taylor, Keeley
    Durance, Thomas
    Jones, Sam M.
    Ratnieks, Francis L. W.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (09):
  • [39] Collective decision-making and fission-fusion dynamics: a conceptual framework
    Sueur, Cedric
    King, Andrew J.
    Conradt, Larissa
    Kerth, Gerald
    Lusseau, David
    Mettke-Hofmann, Claudia
    Schaffner, Colleen M.
    Williams, Leah
    Zinner, Dietmar
    Aureli, Filippo
    OIKOS, 2011, 120 (11) : 1608 - 1617
  • [40] Models in animal collective decision-making: information uncertainty and conflicting preferences
    Conradt, Larissa
    INTERFACE FOCUS, 2012, 2 (02) : 226 - 240