Harnessing Novel Data-Driven Techniques for Precise Rainfall-Runoff Modeling

被引:0
作者
Sammen, Saad Sh. [1 ]
Mohammadpour, Reza [2 ]
Alsafadi, Karam [3 ]
Mokhtar, Ali [4 ]
Shahid, Shamsuddin [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Diyala, Coll Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Baqubah, Diyala Governor, Iraq
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Estahban Branch, Estahban, Iran
[3] Xiamen Univ, Coll Environm & Ecol, Key Lab, Minist Educ Coastal & Wetland Ecosyst, Xiamen, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Cairo Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Engn, Giza, Egypt
[5] Natl Ctr Meteodol, Reginla Climate Change Ctr, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
来源
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT | 2025年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
ANN plus Cuckoo; GMDH; hybrid models; machine learning; rainfall-runoff modeling; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; IMPROVING FORECASTING ACCURACY; NEURAL-NETWORK; HYBRID APPROACH; STREAMFLOW; UNCERTAINTY; SIMULATION; PREDICTION; CATCHMENT; FLOW;
D O I
10.1111/jfr3.70013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Rainfall and runoff are considered the main components of the hydrological cycle, and their forecasting is of great significance in water resource management, particularly for reservoir operation. Developing an accurate model to capture the dynamic connection between rainfall and runoff remains problematic and challenging in water resource management due to the nonstationary characteristics of hydrologic processes and the effects of noise. In this study, data-driven techniques, such as the group method of data handling (GMDH), extreme learning machine (ELM), and two hybrids of artificial neural network (ANN) with Cuckoo search algorithm (ANN + Cuckoo) and genetic algorithm (ANN + GA) were used to model the rainfall-runoff relationship. For a comprehensive analysis, four scenarios were examined based on the different input combinations to test and select the best scenario and best model performance. The results indicated that the performance of ELM and GMDH in predicting runoff was more accurate than that of ANN + Cuckoo and ANN + GA. Although the GMDH predicts runoff with higher accuracy, ELM provides reliable performance in simulating both low and high values. The models' performance can be ranked based on the testing data in the following order: GMDH, ELM, ANN + GA, and ANN + CUKOO. The root mean squared error (RMSE) was recorded as 56.7 and 69.7 m3/s for the GMDH and ELM models, respectively. These low RMSE values highlight the potential of these models in effectively addressing the challenges associated with the complexity of rainfall-runoff simulations. Moreover, the results demonstrate that the machine learning models could be used as a simple, rapid, and inexpensive approach for timely and reliable runoff prediction that is expected to benefit reservoir management.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   AN INTRODUCTION TO THE EUROPEAN HYDROLOGICAL SYSTEM - SYSTEME HYDROLOGIQUE EUROPEEN, SHE .1. HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF A PHYSICALLY-BASED, DISTRIBUTED MODELING SYSTEM [J].
ABBOTT, MB ;
BATHURST, JC ;
CUNGE, JA ;
OCONNELL, PE ;
RASMUSSEN, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1986, 87 (1-2) :45-59
[2]   Review of studies on hydrological modelling in Malaysia [J].
Abdulkareem J.H. ;
Pradhan B. ;
Sulaiman W.N.A. ;
Jamil N.R. .
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2018, 4 (4) :1577-1605
[3]   Using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for finding the best rainfall-runoff model in mountainous watersheds (Case study: the Navrood watershed in Iran) [J].
Adib, Arash ;
Lotfirad, Morteza ;
Haghighi, Ali .
JOURNAL OF MOUNTAIN SCIENCE, 2019, 16 (03) :529-541
[4]   A new approach for simulating and forecasting the rainfall-runoff process within the next two months [J].
Alizadeh, Mohamad Javad ;
Kavianpour, Mohamad Reza ;
Kisi, Ozgur ;
Nourani, Vahid .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2017, 548 :588-597
[5]   An exploration of artificial neural network rainfall-runoff forecasting combined with wavelet decomposition [J].
Anctil, F ;
Tape, DG .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2004, 3 :S121-S128
[6]   Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Muttiah, RS ;
Williams, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01) :73-89
[7]  
Aydn M., 2020, Fuel, V269
[8]  
Babovic V., 2017, Encyclopedia of Water: Science, Technology, and Society, V5, P1081
[9]   Intermittent stream flow forecasting and modelling with hybrid wavelet neuro-fuzzy model [J].
Badrzadeh, Honey ;
Sarukkalige, Ranjan ;
Jayawardena, A. W. .
HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 49 (01) :27-40
[10]   Hourly runoff forecasting for flood risk management: Application of various computational intelligence models [J].
Badrzadeh, Honey ;
Sarukkalige, Ranjan ;
Jayawardena, A. W. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 529 :1633-1643