Violence in doctoral education: uncaring/uncareful practices of supervisors, co-supervisors, professors, and institutional authorities

被引:0
作者
Castelao-Huerta, Isaura [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Res & Adv Studies Cinvestav, Dept Educ Res DIE, Calzada De Los Tenorios 235, Mexico City, Mexico
关键词
Care; postgraduate education; doctoral supervision; neoliberalism; violence; Mexico; STUDENTS; EXPERIENCES; FANTASIES; PEDAGOGY; ROLES;
D O I
10.1080/14681366.2025.2463452
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article argues that the absence of care during doctoral education in neoliberalised academia - which fosters values and measurements of the market, such as individualism, comparison, and accountability - is a form of violence. This violence consists of harmful acts or omissions that cause damage to students and is manifested through uncaring and uncareful practices of supervisors and co-supervisors as well as by professors and institutional authorities (SCPI). Thus, this study exposes how power imbalances and lack of support in some students-SCPI relationships are perpetuated in a neoliberal context. A qualitative phenomenological approach was used to understanding individuals' lived experiences. Empirical data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with eight doctoral students at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) regarding their relationships with SCPI. The information was subjected to inductive thematic analysis, revealing that, according to these students' perceptions, the uncaring practices involved dehumanised treatment and hindering research, and the uncareful practices comprised forsaking and extractivism. The consequences of these practices affect both the mental health of students and the development of their research. This highlights the urgent need to transform academia into a more caring and careful place.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Aboites H., 2011, Cisma: Revista Del Centro Telrico de Investigaciones Tericas, V1, P1
  • [2] Good teaching as care in higher education
    Anderson, Vivienne
    Rabello, Rafaela
    Wass, Rob
    Golding, Clinton
    Rangi, Ana
    Eteuati, Esmay
    Bristowe, Zoe
    Waller, Arianna
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 79 (01) : 1 - 19
  • [3] Content and context in knowledge production: a critical review of doctoral supervision literature
    Bastalich, Wendy
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (07) : 1145 - 1157
  • [4] The impact of neoliberal education on the alignment of student-supervisor expectations in Malaysia
    Baydarova, Irina
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 42 (03) : 544 - 558
  • [5] Graduate students' experiences of plagiarism by their professors
    Becker, Kimberly D.
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2019, 73 (02) : 251 - 265
  • [6] Bengtsen S. S. E., 2014, Review of the Handbook Literature on Doctoral Supervision
  • [7] Breeze M., 2020, Feminist Repetitions in Higher Education: Interrupting Career Categories, P49, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-53661-93, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-53661-93]
  • [8] Brown W, 2015, NEAR FUTURES, P1
  • [9] Academic Labor: Who Cares?
    Cardozo, Karen M.
    [J]. CRITICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2017, 43 (03) : 405 - 428
  • [10] Exploring the wellbeing and resilience of postgraduate researchers
    Casey, Chloe
    Harvey, Orlanda
    Taylor, Julia
    Knight, Fiona
    Trenoweth, Steven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 46 (06) : 850 - 867