Exploring esophagogastric junction morphology and contractile integral: implications for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease pathophysiology

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Sihui [1 ]
Chen, Zhilong [1 ]
Jiang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Yucheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Xiamen Branch, 668 Jinhu Rd, Xiamen 361015, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Esophagogastric junction; gastroesophageal reflux; high resolution manometry; reflux monitoring; lower esophageal sphincter; HIGH-RESOLUTION MANOMETRY; HIATAL-HERNIA;
D O I
10.1080/00365521.2025.2450042
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Evaluate the clinical significance of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology and esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) in refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) patients. Methods: From June 2021 to June 2023, 144 RGERD patients underwent comprehensive evaluation, recording symptom scores, demographic data. GERD classification (NERD or RE, A-D) was based on endoscopic findings. Reflux was assessed through 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring, and high-resolution esophageal manometry(HREM) measured parameters including EGJ-CI. Results: HREM revealed EGJ morphologies (type I, II, III) in 80.6%, 13.9%, and 5.6% of subjects, respectively. As the separation between the lower esophageal sphincter(LES) and crural diaphragm(CD) increased, EGJ-CI decreased (p < 0.005). Subjects with EGJ morphology types II and III had significantly higher acid exposure times(AET), DeMeester scores, and impedance reflux times than type I (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between types II and III. Impedance reflux times in subjects with type III morphology were significantly higher than those with types I and II (p < 0.05). The optimal EGJ-CI cutoff for distinguishing pathological reflux was 24.8 mmHg<middle dot>cm, with 68% sensitivity, 72.3% specificity, and an AUC of 0.693 (95% CI 0.609-0.768). Logistic regression analysis identified EGJ-CI <24.8 mmHg<middle dot>cm (OR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-5.5, p = 0.022) and ineffective esophageal motility(IEM) (OR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-5.2, p = 0.027) as independent risk factors. Conclusion: EGJ-CI is crucial for clinically assessing EGJ barrier function, predicting pathological reflux and selecting patients with persistent reflux symptoms for surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 135
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Hiatus hernia and intrathoracic migration of esophagogastric junction in gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Mattioli, S
    D'Ovidio, F
    Pilotti, V
    Di Simone, MP
    Lugaresi, ML
    Bassi, F
    Brusori, S
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2003, 48 (09) : 1823 - 1831
  • [12] Hiatus Hernia and Intrathoracic Migration of Esophagogastric Junction in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Sandro Mattioli
    Franco D'Ovidio
    Vladimiro Pilotti
    Massimo P. Di Simone
    Maria L. Lugaresi
    Francesco Bassi
    Stefano Brusori
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2003, 48 : 1823 - 1831
  • [13] Esophagogastric junction contractile integral and morphology: Two high-resolution manometry metrics of the anti-reflux barrier
    Ham, Hyoju
    Cho, Yu Kyung
    Lee, Han Hee
    Yoon, Seung Bae
    Lim, Chul-Hyun
    Kim, Jin Su
    Park, Jae Myung
    Choi, Myung-Gyu
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 (08) : 1443 - 1449
  • [14] The Usefulness of the Measurement of Esophagogastric Junction Distensibility by EndoFLIP in the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Lee, Jung Min
    Yoo, In Kyung
    Kim, Eunju
    Hong, Sung Pyo
    Cho, Joo Young
    GUT AND LIVER, 2021, 15 (04) : 546 - 552
  • [15] Abnormal Structure and Function of the Esophagogastric Junction and Proximal Stomach in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Curcic, Jelena
    Roy, Shammodip
    Schwizer, Alexandra
    Kaufman, Elad
    Forras-Kaufman, Zsofi A.
    Menne, Dieter
    Hebbard, Geoffrey S.
    Treier, Reto
    Boesiger, Peter
    Steingoetter, Andreas
    Fried, Michael
    Schwizer, Werner
    Pal, Anupam
    Fox, Mark
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 109 (05): : 658 - 667
  • [16] Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Lee, Yeong Yeh
    McColl, Kenneth E. L.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 27 (03) : 339 - 351
  • [17] Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
    Boeckxstaens, Guy E.
    Rohof, Wout O.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 43 (01) : 15 - +
  • [18] Pathophysiology of the gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Wetscher, GJ
    Glaser, K
    Wieschemeyer, T
    Gadenstatter, M
    Profanter, C
    CHIRURGISCHE GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 1997, 13 (02): : 86 - 91
  • [19] PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE
    TIMMER, R
    BREUMELHOF, R
    NADORP, JHSM
    SMOUT, AJPM
    NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 44 (01): : 1 - 4
  • [20] Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease
    Fein, M
    Tigges, H
    Maroske, J
    Freys, SM
    Fuchs, KH
    CHIRURGISCHE GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 2001, 17 (01): : 8 - 13