Sustainability beyond the triple bottom line: evaluating transformative change in food systems

被引:0
作者
Gunton, Richard M. [1 ,2 ]
van der Stoep, Jan [3 ]
Araya, Yoseph [4 ]
Jochemsen, Henk [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Winchester, Dept Digital Technol, Winchester, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Dept Phys & Chem Sci, London, England
[3] Wageningen Univ & Res, Philosophy Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Open Univ, Sch Environm Earth & Ecosyst Sci, Milton Keynes, England
关键词
environment; welfare; social; economic; harmony; justice; care; values; CLIMATE-CHANGE; VALUES;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2024.1483942
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The concept of 'sustainability' has developed into a rich discourse concerned with diverse human responsibilities in our economic life, and as such it is in constant danger of over-simplification. The conventional two-way analysis of sustainability, into (1) human needs as ends and (2) means to meet such needs, and the scheme of nine planetary boundaries, are taken as starting points for a more balanced proposal set out in this conceptual paper. Inspired by the framework of Doughnut Economics and drawing on a collection of recent articles in this journal, we identify a set of 12 aspects for evaluating transformative change and apply them to food systems: seven typically instrumental goods (means) and five typically final goods (ends). Recognising that such classifications are worldview-dependent, however, our 'home model' breaks down the 12 aspects into 37 criteria as the basis for a practical tool for evaluating particular business models and policy initiatives. The paper concludes by offering a philosophical account of transformative change and identifying institutional factors crucial for local progress towards sustainability transitions, in food systems and also more broadly.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[21]  
Food and Agriculture Organisation via World Bank, 2024, Agricultural land (% of land area) dataset
[22]  
Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN, 2024, Suite of food security indicators
[23]  
Garnett Tara., 2012, SUSTAINABLE INTENSIF
[24]   The Circular Economy A new sustainability paradigm? [J].
Geissdoerfer, Martin ;
Savaget, Paulo ;
Bocken, Nancy M. P. ;
Hultink, Erik Jan .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 143 :757-768
[25]  
Glas J. J., 2024, BACK FUTURE, P411, DOI [10.1163/9789004715509067, DOI 10.1163/9789004715509067]
[26]  
Global Sustainability Standards Board, 2024, Consolidated set of the GRI standards
[27]   Valuing beyond economics: A pluralistic evaluation framework for participatory policymaking [J].
Gunton, Richard M. ;
Hejnowicz, Adam P. ;
Basden, Andrew ;
van Asperen, Eline N. ;
Christie, Ian ;
Hanson, David R. ;
Hartley, Sue E. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 196
[28]  
Gunton RM, 2016, NAT PLANTS, V2, DOI [10.1038/NPLANTS.2016.65, 10.1038/nplants.2016.65]
[29]   What is enlightened agriculture? A multi-normative approach to the nature and values of food production systems [J].
Gunton, Richard M. M. .
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
[30]  
Hills G. A., 1974, Landsc. Plan, V1, P339, DOI [10.1016/0304-3924(74)90024-0, DOI 10.1016/0304-3924(74)90024-0]