Bispectral Index-Monitored Anesthesia Induction in Older Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: Comparing Ciprofol and Propofol in a Prospective, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study

被引:0
|
作者
Zou, Haibin [1 ]
Xi, Fangfang [1 ]
Fu, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Xu, Jinhui [1 ]
Zhang, Ping [1 ]
Li, Dongge [2 ]
Luo, Heguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangxi Prov Peoples Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanchang Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Jiangxi Med Coll, Jiangxi Med Coll,Dept Orthoped, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
ciprofol; propofol; bispectral index; BIS; hypotension; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; PHARMACOKINETICS; INJECTION; SAFETY; PAIN;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S484532
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Purpose: Ciprofol, a new sedative anesthetic developed in China, offers rapid onset and recovery, reduced injection pain, and stable circulation. However, its effect on blood pressure during anesthesia induction in older adults remains unclear. To compare the effects of propofol and ciprofol on hypotension induced by general anesthesia in older adults.<br /> Patients and Methods: This prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical study enrolled 117 older adults undergoing surgery. Patients in the ciprofol group (group C) received an intravenous injection of ciprofol (0.3 mg/kg, n=57), while the propofol group (group P) received an intravenous injection of propofol (1.5 mg/kg, n=58). The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension (mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased by > 30% from baseline or MAP< 65 mmHg). Secondary outcomes included induction success rate (bispectral index (BIS) value <= 60 and Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAA/S) score <= 1), injection pain, number of drug additions, time to BIS 60, time to eyelash reflex disappearance, blood pressure changes, incidence of hypertension, tachycardia and BIS values before and after administration.<br /> Results: The incidence of induced hypotension was 26.3% (15/57) in group C and 48.3% (28/58) in group P (OR=0.383, 95% CI:175- 0.837, P =0.015). Group C had significantly lower injection pain incidence (5.3% vs 20.7%, OR=0.213, 95% CI: 0.057- 0.801, p=0.014). Both groups had a 100% induction success rate, with no significant difference in the number of additional doses. Post-intubation hypertension and tachycardia incidence were not significantly different. Group C showed less blood pressure decrease during induction and a deeper anesthesia level.<br /> Conclusion: Compared to propofol, ciprofol reduces the incidence of induced hypotension in older adults and maintains more stable blood pressure during induction. Additionally, ciprofol reduces injection pain and provides a good depth of anesthesia, making it a safe and effective option for anesthesia induction in older adults.<br /> Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: ChiCTR2200066053.
引用
收藏
页码:4993 / 5003
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the Efficacy of HSK3486 and Propofol for Induction of General Anesthesia in Adults: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Phase 3 Noninferiority Trial
    Gan, Tong J.
    Bertoch, Todd
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    Yan, Pangke
    Zhou, Rong
    Lai, Yu-Ling
    Liu, Xiao
    Essandoh, Michael
    Daley, William L.
    Gelb, Adrian W.
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 140 (04) : 690 - 700
  • [22] Comparison of Remimazolam and Propofol on Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Radical Resection of Colon Cancer: A Single-Center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
    Liu, Tianlin
    Zhao, Haochen
    Zhao, Xiaochen
    Qu, Min
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2024, 30
  • [23] Target-controlled infusion during monitored anesthesia care in patients undergoing EUS: Propofol alone versus midazolam plus propofol A prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial
    Fanti, L.
    Agostoni, M.
    Arcidiacono, P. G.
    Albertin, A.
    Strini, G.
    Carrara, S.
    Guslandi, M.
    Torri, G.
    Testoni, P. A.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2007, 39 (01) : 81 - 86
  • [24] Dexmedetomidine as an Adjunct to Propofol in Patients Undergoing Elective Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangio-Pancreaticography - A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study
    Babu, T. Raghavendra
    Kumar, M. R. Anil
    Anup, N. R.
    Shetty, Sarika M.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 : S399 - S402
  • [25] Effect of different doses of esketamine compared with fentanyl combined with propofol on hypotension in patients undergoing painless abortion surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial
    Chen, Jiejuan
    Zou, Xiaohua
    Hu, Bailong
    Yang, Yang
    Wang, Feng
    Zhou, Qian
    Shen, Minhuan
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [26] The Efficacy and Safety of Diazepam for Intraoperative Blood Pressure Stabilization in Hypertensive Patients Undergoing Vitrectomy Under Nerve Block Anesthesia: A Prospective, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Qian, Tianwei
    Gong, Qiaoyun
    Shu, Yiyang
    Shen, Hangqi
    Wu, Xia
    Wang, Weijun
    Zhang, Zhihua
    Cao, Hui
    Xu, Xun
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2024, 20 : 9 - 18
  • [27] Effects of pretreatment with intravenous palonosetron for propofol-remifentanil-based anesthesia in breast and thyroid cancer surgery: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study
    Lee, Kye Hyeok
    Rim, Sung Kyu
    Lee, Ji Yeon
    Lee, So Young
    Lee, Su Nam
    Lee, Eun Ju
    Lee, Ji Heui
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [28] Effects of glycopyrrolate and atropine for oral secretions and perioperative hemodynamics in children undergoing tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy: a prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Tao, Yi-Bin
    Tang, Zi-Li
    Lin, Zhong-Lan
    Lei, Wei-Ping
    Lu, Xin-Lei
    Sun, Jian-Liang
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [29] Stress doses of hydrocortisone reverse hyperdynamic septic shock: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-center study
    Briegel, J
    Forst, H
    Haller, M
    Schelling, G
    Kilger, E
    Kuprat, G
    Hemmer, B
    Hummel, T
    Lenhart, A
    Heyduck, M
    Stoll, C
    Peter, K
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (04) : 723 - 732
  • [30] Comparison between single bolus dose administration and continuous infusion of remimazolam for general anesthesia induction in non-cardiac surgery: a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial
    Ikeda, Tsuyoshi
    Miyoshi, Hirotsugu
    Kido, Kenshiro
    Sumii, Ayako
    Otsuki, Sachiko
    Kato, Takahiro
    Nakamura, Ryuji
    Narasaki, Soshi
    Tsutsumi, Yasuo M.
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 25 (01):