The impact of intrauterine adhesions on endometrial receptivity in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

被引:0
作者
Ouyang, Yan [1 ]
Peng, Yangqin [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Mingxiang [1 ]
Mao, Yuyao [1 ]
Gong, Fei [1 ,3 ]
Li, Yuan [1 ]
Chen, Hui [1 ]
Li, Xihong [1 ]
机构
[1] Reprod & Genet Hosp CIT Xiangya, Clin Res Ctr Reprod & Genet Hunan Prov, Changsha, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
[3] Hunan Univ, Cent South Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, NHC Key Lab Human Stem Cell & Reprod Engn, Changsha, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY | 2025年 / 15卷
关键词
endometrial receptivity; intrauterine adhesion; frozen-thawed embryo transfer; natural cycle; ovulation day; transvaginal sonography; DIMINISHED OVARIAN RESERVE; ASHERMAN-SYNDROME; ULTRASOUND; MODERATE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2024.1489839
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To clarify whether intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) affect endometrial receptivity (ER) on the day of ovulation and to compare patients with mild and moderate-severe adhesions. Methods This prospective cohort study included 592 infertile women with IUAs who underwent frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). Patients were divided into groups with or without IUAs; and pregnant and nonpregnant populations based on whether a clinical pregnancy was achieved. The ultrasound ER parameters on the ovulation day were compared. Patients with IUAs were then divided into mild or moderate-severe IUA subgroups according to IUA degree. Results The proportions of patients with Type B plus Type C endometrial morphology (94% vs. 75%, P<0.001), an endometrial thickness >= 8mm (97% vs. 81%, P<0.001), an endometrial volume >= 2ml (94% vs. 67%, P<0.001), a frequency of endometrial peristalsis >= 2 times/min (84% vs. 53%, P<0.001), low subendometrial volume (11.54 +/- 2.94 vs. 9.57 +/- 2.35, P<0.001) and subendometrial vascularization flow index (VFI) values (2.70 +/- 3.10 vs. 2.23 +/- 2.23, P=0.033) and a low live birth rate (65% vs. 56%, P=0.039) were significantly higher in the group without IUAs than in the group with IUAs. The group with moderate-severe IUAs had lower proportion of patients with an endometrial thickness >= 8mm (73% vs. 89%, P=0.008) and an endometrial volume >= 2ml (58% vs. 78%, P=0.005), a lower frequency of endometrial peristalsis >= 2 times/min (42% vs. 65%, P=0.003), and low subendometrial volume (9.22 +/- 2.29 vs. 9.97 +/- 2.36, P=0.023) and subendometrial flow index (FI) (31.48 +/- 3.64 vs. 33.43 +/- 4.17, P=0.002) values than the group with mild IUAs; a high antral follicle count (AFC), basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and anti-M & uuml;llerian hormone (AMH) levels and an endometrial thickness >= 8mm were independent predictors of clinical pregnancy. Conclusion IUAs can affect ER on the ovulation day and the live birth rate during natural cycles. Moderate-severe IUAs have a greater impact on ER than mild adhesions do; however, if these adhesions are treated properly, they do not have adverse effects on the clinical pregnancy rate. A high AFC, basal FSH and AMH levels and an endometrial thickness >= 8 mm were found to be independent predictors of clinical pregnancy.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Aagl Elevating Gynecologic Surg Gr, 2017, GYNECOL SURG, V14, DOI 10.1186/s10397-017-1007-3
  • [2] Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology, 2011, Hum Reprod, V26, P1270, DOI 10.1093/humrep/der037
  • [3] Human Amnion as a Temporary Biologic Barrier after Hysteroscopic Lysis of Severe Intrauterine Adhesions: Pilot Study
    Amer, Mohamed I.
    Abd-El-Maeboud, Karim H. I.
    Abdelfatah, Ihab
    Salama, Fekrya Ahmad
    Abdallah, Al Said
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (05) : 605 - 611
  • [4] Ultrasound and intrauterine adhesions: a novel structured approach to diagnosis and management
    Amin, T. N.
    Saridogan, E.
    Jurkovic, D.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (02) : 131 - 139
  • [6] THE UTERINE BIOPHYSICAL PROFILE
    APPLEBAUM, M
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 5 (01) : 67 - 68
  • [7] Arora A., 2021, J South Asian Fed Obstet Gynaecol, DOI [10.1007/s13224-015-0742-5, DOI 10.1007/S13224-015-0742-5]
  • [8] Preimplantation 3D ultrasound: current uses and challenges
    Arya, Sushila
    Plavsic, Sanja Kupesic
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (06) : 745 - 758
  • [9] Anti-adhesion barrier gels following operative hysteroscopy for treating female infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bosteels, Jan
    Weyers, Steven
    Mol, Ben W. J.
    D'Hooghe, Thomas
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY, 2014, 11 (02) : 113 - 127
  • [10] The role of preoperative 3D-ultrasound in intraoperative judgement for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis
    Burjoo, Arvind
    Zhao, Xingping
    Zou, Lingxiao
    Liu, Xinyi
    Lei, Lei
    Zhang, Baiyun
    Xu, Dabao
    [J]. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2020, 8 (04)