Given a wingspan, which windplane design maximizes power?

被引:1
作者
Trevisi, Filippo [1 ]
Croce, Alessandro [1 ]
机构
[1] PoliMi, Dept Aerosp Sci & Technol, Milan, Italy
来源
SCIENCE OF MAKING TORQUE FROM WIND, TORQUE 2024 | 2024年 / 2767卷
关键词
AIRBORNE; OPTIMIZATION; KITE; WAKE;
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/2767/7/072014
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Windplanes (i.e. Fly-Gen airborne wind energy systems) harvest wind power via the turbines placed on the tethered wing, which flies crosswind trajectories. In this paper, the optimal design of windplanes is investigated with simplified models, enabling an intuitive understanding of their physical characteristics. The windplane is then idealized as a point mass flying circular fully crosswind trajectories. If the gravity is neglected, the dynamic problem is axial symmetric and the solution is steady. The generated power can be expressed in non-dimensional form by normalizing it with the wind power passing by a disk with radius the wingspan. Since the reference area is taken to be a function of just the wingspan, looking for the design which maximizes this power coefficient addresses the question "Given a wingspan, which design maximizes power?". This is different from the literature, where the design problem is formulated per wing area and not per wingspan. The optimal designs have a finite aspect ratio and operate at the maximum lift-to-drag ratio of the airfoil. Airfoils maximizing the lift-to-drag ratio are then optimal for windplanes. If gravity is included in the model, gravitational potential energy is being exchanged over one revolution. Since this exchange comes with an associated efficiency, the plane mass and the related trajectory radius are designed to reduce the potential energy fluctuating over the loop. However, for decreasing turning radii, the available wind power decreases because the windplane sweeps a lower area. For these two conflicting reasons, the optimal mass is finite.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Drag power kite with very high lift coefficient
    Bauer, Florian
    Kennel, Ralph M.
    Hackl, Christoph M.
    Campagnolo, Filippo
    Patt, Michael
    Schmehl, Roland
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2018, 118 : 290 - 305
  • [2] Blanch M., 2022, GETTING AIRBORNE NEE
  • [3] Structural analysis and optimization of a tethered swept wing for airborne wind energy generation
    Candade, Ashwin A.
    Ranneberg, Maximilian
    Schmehl, Roland
    [J]. WIND ENERGY, 2020, 23 (04) : 1006 - 1025
  • [4] Airborne wind energy: Basic concepts and physical foundations
    [J]. Diehl, M. (moritz.diehl@esat.kuleuven.be), 1600, Springer Verlag : 3 - 22
  • [5] Echeverri P., ENERGY KITE 1
  • [6] Autonomous Airborne Wind Energy Systems: Accomplishments and Challenges
    Fagiano, Lorenzo
    Quack, Manfred
    Bauer, Florian
    Carnel, Lode
    Oland, Espen
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONTROL ROBOTICS AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, 2022, 5 : 603 - 631
  • [7] Aerostructural optimization of a morphing wing for airborne wind energy applications
    Fasel, U.
    Keidel, D.
    Molinari, G.
    Ermanni, P.
    [J]. SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2017, 26 (09)
  • [8] CROSSWIND KITE POWER
    LOYD, ML
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY, 1980, 4 (03): : 106 - 111
  • [9] McGowan A, 2017, PROC FRONT EDUC CONF
  • [10] Naik K., 2022, J DYNAMIC SYSTEMS ME, V145, p011 005