Who gains, who loses? - The impact of the belt and road initiative on bilateral agricultural trade

被引:6
作者
Zhao, Yongzhi [1 ,2 ]
Ji, Changjing [3 ]
Chen, Yangfen [1 ]
Zhu, Xueqin [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Agr Sci, Inst Agr Econ & Dev, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Environm Econ & Nat Resources Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Shanghai Tech Univ, Inst Carbon Neutral, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Belt and Road Initiative; Bilateral agricultural trade; Trade creation effect; China; Structural gravity model; AGREEMENTS; GRAVITY; INTEGRATION; CREATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102284
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a global development strategy proposed by China, has received extensive attention from researchers in the field of international trade and development economics. However, little is known about the BRI's effect on bilateral agricultural trade. This paper quantifies the effect of BRI on global agricultural trade, especially between China and BRI participating countries, based on structural gravity models and the General Equilibrium Poisson Pseudo Maximum Likelihood (GEPPML) method. Our results show that BRI has a significant and positive impact on global agricultural trade. BRI not only improves the agricultural trade between China and its BRI partners but also stimulates agricultural trade between BRI participating and non-participating countries, indicating a pure trade creation effect. We find the heterogeneous effect of BRI in participating countries regarding per capita income, showing an increase in agricultural exports from China to non-high-income BRI countries but a reduction in exports from China to high-income BRI countries. It highlights the importance of considering specific economic status when formulating trade agreements with trade partners. We find the significant positive impact of BRI on welfare gains, particularly for consumers in China and producers in BRI participating countries. Meanwhile, BRI leads to a reallocation of China's agricultural imports away from the United States and Brazil towards neighboring BRI participating countries.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Intra-national trade costs: Assaying regional frictions [J].
Agnosteva, Delina E. ;
Anderson, James E. ;
Yotov, Yoto V. .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2019, 112 :32-50
[2]   GEPPML: General equilibrium analysis with PPML [J].
Anderson, James E. ;
Larch, Mario ;
Yotov, Yoto V. .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2018, 41 (10) :2750-2782
[3]   Terms of trade and global efficiency effects of free trade agreements, 1990-2002 [J].
Anderson, James E. ;
Yotov, Yoto V. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 99 :279-298
[4]   Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :170-192
[5]   Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade? [J].
Baier, Scott L. ;
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 71 (01) :72-95
[6]   On the widely differing effects of free trade agreements: Lessons from twenty years of trade integration [J].
Baier, Scott L. ;
Yotov, Yoto V. ;
Zylkin, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2019, 116 :206-226
[7]   Heterogeneous effects of economic integration agreements [J].
Baier, Scott L. ;
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. ;
Clance, Matthew W. .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2018, 135 :587-608
[8]   A Framework to Assess Debt Sustainability under the Belt and Road Initiative [J].
Bandiera, Luca ;
Tsiropoulos, Vasileios .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2020, 146
[9]   Trade effects of the New Silk Road: A gravity analysis [J].
Baniya, Suprabha ;
Rocha, Nadia ;
Ruta, Michele .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2020, 146
[10]   Economic integration agreements, border effects, and distance elasticities in the gravity equation [J].
Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. ;
Larch, Mario ;
Yotov, Yoto V. .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 78 :307-327