Safety and Depth of Sedation With Ketamine Alone Versus Ketamine With Midazolam in Pediatric Fracture Reduction

被引:0
|
作者
Wells, Kimberly [1 ]
Calleo, Vincent [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Syracuse, NY USA
关键词
pediatric sedation; ketamine; midazolam; fracture reduction; PATIENT DATA METAANALYSIS; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; PREDICTORS; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1097/PEC.0000000000003185
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
ObjectivesPediatric patients with extremity fractures often require sedation for fracture reduction in the pediatric emergency department (PED). Although orthopedic literature suggests combination sedation regimens may be more effective for fracture reduction, some pediatric literature suggests adverse events are more frequent. The primary objective of this study is to determine the comparable depth of sedation and incidence of adverse events when intravenous ketamine is used alone versus with midazolam for pediatric procedural sedation and orthopedic fracture reduction.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients 2-18 years old who underwent sedation for fracture reduction in the PED at a single level 1 trauma center over a 2-year period. Medical records were reviewed, and occurrence of adverse events, depth of sedation (Ramsey score), midazolam dose, total ketamine administration, opiate administration, total sedation time, and time to PED discharge were compared in patients who received ketamine alone versus those who received ketamine with midazolam. Logistic regression models were adjusted to evaluate for potential confounders.ResultsThere was a statistically significant increase in the occurrence of hypoxia with coadministration of midazolam (5% vs 0%). When hypoxia occurred, it was mild and resolved with repositioning or administration of supplemental oxygen. Length of sedation was increased in sedations with coadministration of benzodiazepines by approximately 3.5 minutes. Time to PED discharge was not significantly different. There was no significant difference in depth of sedation, ketamine dose administered, end-tidal CO2 measurements, administration of positive pressure ventilation, vomiting, agitation, or overall occurrence of adverse events. No patients developed apnea or laryngospasm.ConclusionsThis study showed a low rate of adverse events in pediatric sedation for orthopedic reduction with ketamine alone or ketamine with midazolam. There was an increased occurrence of hypoxia with coadministration of midazolam and an increase in the length of sedation. This study showed no difference in depth of sedation based on Ramsay scores when midazolam was coadministered. Information on the orthopedic reduction and provider satisfaction was not collected.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 721
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Oral Midazolam-Ketamine versus Midazolam alone for Procedural Sedation of Children Undergoing Computed Tomography; a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Majidinejad, Saeed
    Taherian, Keramat
    Esmailian, Mehrdad
    Khazaei, Mehdi
    Samaie, Vajihe
    EMERGENCY, 2015, 3 (02): : 64 - 69
  • [22] Sedation with intravenous ketamine and midazolam for painful procedures in children
    Karapinar, B
    Yilmaz, D
    Demirag, K
    Kantar, M
    PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 48 (02) : 146 - 151
  • [23] Ketamine and midazolam sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in the Arab world
    Mohamad-Iqbal S Miqdady
    Wail A Hayajneh
    Ruba Abdelhadi
    Mark A Gilger
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2011, 17 (31) : 3630 - 3635
  • [24] Ketamine and midazolam sedation for pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy in the Arab world
    Miqdady, Mohamad-Iqbal S.
    Hayajneh, Wail A.
    Abdelhadi, Ruba
    Gilger, Mark A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 17 (31) : 3630 - 3635
  • [25] Midazolam–ketamine versus dexmedetomidine–ketamine combinations for anesthesia of pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization
    Mohammed Abdelsalam Menshawi
    Hany Magdy Fahim
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 11
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of intravenous midazolam and ketamine as sedation for therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in children
    Parker, RI
    Mahan, RA
    Giugliano, D
    Parker, MM
    PEDIATRICS, 1997, 99 (03) : 427 - 431
  • [27] A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: combination of ketamine and propofol versus ketamine alone for procedural sedation and analgesia in children
    Hu, Yaofei
    Xu, Wujie
    Cao, Fei
    INTERNAL AND EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 14 (07) : 1159 - 1165
  • [28] Ketamine, Propofol, and Ketofol Use for Pediatric Sedation
    Alletag, Michelle J.
    Auerbach, Marc A.
    Baum, Carl R.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2012, 28 (12) : 1391 - 1395
  • [29] Comparative evaluation of midazolam and ketamine with midazolam alone as oral premedication
    Ghai, B
    Grandhe, RP
    Kumar, A
    Chari, P
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2005, 15 (07) : 554 - 559
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of atropine-midazolam-ketamine in pediatric oncology patients
    Auletta, JJ
    O'Riordan, MA
    Nieder, ML
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1999, 60 (12): : 683 - 693