Aligning implementation research and clinical operations: a partnership to promote implementation research in primary care

被引:0
|
作者
Chepp, Valerie [1 ,2 ]
Masiano, Steven [1 ,2 ]
Scarcipino, Mario [1 ]
Hudak, Audrey [3 ]
Steinel, Eva [3 ]
Babiuch, Christopher [3 ]
Misra-Hebert, Anita D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Healthcare Delivery & Implementat Sci Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Primary Care Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
Implementation science; Healthcare quality improvement; Primary care;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002879
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The rigorous evaluation of the implementation of evidence into routine practice in a health system requires strong alignment between research and clinical operational teams. Implementation researchers benefit from understanding operational processes and contextual factors when designing data collection while operational teams gain an understanding of implementation frameworks and outcomes using both qualitative and quantitative data. However, interventions to build capacity for these evaluation partnerships-particularly those tailored for clinical operational practitioners-are limited. We developed a model for a research-clinical operational partnership to build capacity for rigorous implementation evaluation. The model incorporated didactic and interactive education alongside small group discussion. Using reflective qualitative analysis, we show how the year-long partnership resulted in an effective collaboration that built capacity for rigorous operational evaluation, informed plans for data collection to include provider and patient barriers to adoption and increased awareness of implementation cost barriers. Improved capacity for implementation evaluation was demonstrated by the knowledge acquisition that resulted for both teams as a result of the collaboration and the education that penetrated to other aspects of the operational team's work beyond the immediate project. Programme successes and improvement opportunities were also identified. The partnership model shows how a formal research-clinical operational collaboration can build capacity for rigorous implementation evaluation and close the gap between implementation researchers and practitioners in a large health system. While larger-scale process evaluation is common, creating space for project-specific capacity-building initiatives, with varying levels of research involvement, can also advance the field of implementation science, offering new perspectives and partnerships, as well as opportunities to advance learning even for smaller-scale evidence translation.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EvidenceNOW: Balancing Primary Care Implementation and Implementation Research
    Meyers, David
    Miller, Therese
    Genevro, Janice
    Zhan, Chunliu
    De La Mare, Jan
    Fournier, Alaina
    Bennett, Harriet
    McNellis, Robert J.
    ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 16 : S5 - S11
  • [2] Aligning organisational priorities and implementation science for cancer research
    Best, Stephanie
    Thursky, Karin
    Buzza, Mark
    Klaic, Marlena
    Peters, Sanne
    Guccione, Lisa
    Trainer, Alison
    Francis, Jillian
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [3] Aligning organisational priorities and implementation science for cancer research
    Stephanie Best
    Karin Thursky
    Mark Buzza
    Marlena Klaic
    Sanne Peters
    Lisa Guccione
    Alison Trainer
    Jillian Francis
    BMC Health Services Research, 24
  • [4] Improving the Quality of Primary Care by Optimizing Implementation Research Reporting
    Grandes, Gonzalo
    Pinnock, Hilary
    Bazemore, Andrew
    Meissner, Paul
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (03) : 484 - 487
  • [5] Implementation research in clinical trials
    Wensing, Michel
    JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE, 2021, 14 (02) : 85 - 86
  • [6] Dissemination and Implementation Science in Primary Care Research and Practice: Contributions and Opportunities
    Holtrop, Jodi Summers
    Rabin, Borsika A.
    Glasgow, Russell E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2018, 31 (03) : 466 - 478
  • [7] Priorities for implementation research on diagnosing cancer in primary care: a consensus process
    Willis, Thomas A.
    Neal, Richard D.
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Foy, Robbie
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [8] Accelerating Implementation of Virtual Care in an Integrated Health Care System: Future Research and Operations Priorities
    Allison A. Lewinski
    Caitlin Sullivan
    Kelli D. Allen
    Matthew J. Crowley
    Jennifer M. Gierisch
    Karen M. Goldstein
    Kaileigh Gray
    Susan N. Hastings
    George L. Jackson
    Felicia McCant
    Abigail Shapiro
    Matthew Tucker
    Carolyn Turvey
    Leah L. Zullig
    Hayden B. Bosworth
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2021, 36 : 2434 - 2442
  • [9] Transitioning an Implementation Research Intervention to a Sustained Clinical Service: Telehealth Primary Care Mental Health Integration Implementation in Veterans Health Administration
    Woodward, Eva N.
    Oliver, Karen Anderson
    Drummond, Karen L.
    Bartnik, Mary Kate
    Mccorkindale, Amanda
    Meit, Scott S.
    Owen, Richard R.
    Kirchner, JoAnn E.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2024,
  • [10] Priorities for implementation research on diagnosing cancer in primary care: a consensus process
    Thomas A Willis
    Richard D Neal
    Fiona M Walter
    Robbie Foy
    BMC Health Services Research, 23