Self-care experiences and behaviors in people with osteoporosis: A meta-synthesis

被引：0

作者：

Tedesco, Chiara ^{[1
]}

Bernalte-Marti, Vicente ^{[2
]}

Pucciarelli, Gianluca ^{[1
]}

Vellone, Ercole ^{[1
,4
]}

Zannetti, Emanuela Basilici ^{[1
]}

Cittadini, Noemi ^{[1
]}

Pennini, Annalisa ^{[1
]}

Tarantino, Umberto ^{[3
]}

Alvaro, Rosaria ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Rome, Italy

[2] Univ Jaume 1, Fac Ciencias Salud, Castellon De La Plana, Spain

[3] Fdn PTV Policlin Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy

[4] Wroclaw Med Univ, Dept Nursing & Midwifery, Wroclaw, Poland

来源：

MATURITAS | 2025年 / 195卷

关键词：

Self-care; Osteoporosis; Self-care behaviors; Self-care experiences; Geriatric illnesses; Qualitative; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HEALTH-CARE; OLDER WOMEN; PERCEPTIONS; STRATEGIES; ADHERENCE; DISEASE;

D O I：

10.1016/j.maturitas.2025.108213

中图分类号：

R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];

学科分类号：

03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;

摘要：

Osteoporosis is a chronic systemic skeletal disease that can benefit from patient-led self-care behaviors. The purpose of this meta-synthesis is to summarize the knowledge about the experiences in self-care behaviors, according to Riegel's middle-range theory of self-care, of patients affected by osteoporosis. A systematic review of the literature and a meta-synthesis of the results were performed to identify qualitative and mixed-method studies through database research conducted on six databases until June 2023 that identified 27 articles. Three dimensions of self-care were recognized within the articles: 'maintenance' was the most reported, mostly associated with therapy adherence; 'monitoring', predominantly related to instrumental test; and, 'management', mainly related to the management of symptoms. A cross-cutting topic that emerges and has been shown to be relevant is that of the relationship with health professionals.

引用

页数：14

共 64 条

[21] Alvaro R., Et al., Can educational interventions improve osteoporotic women's adherence to treatment? A literature review, Orthop. Nurs., 34, 6, pp. 340-353, (2015)
[22] Jaarsma T., Et al., Status of theory use in self-care research, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 24, (2020)
[23] Cittadini N., D'Angelo D., Basilici Zannetti E., Celi M., Pennini A., Rocco G., Development and testing of a new instrument to measure self-care in patients with osteoporosis: the self-care of osteoporosis scale, International Journal of Bone Fragility, 1, 1, pp. 28-33, (2021)
[24] Page M.J., Et al., The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews, BMJ, 372, (2021)
[25] Methley A.M., Campbell S., Chew-Graham C., McNally R., Cheraghi-Sohi S., PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews, BMC Health Serv. Res., 14, 1, (2014)
[26] Cooke A., Smith D., Booth A., Beyond PICO, Qual. Health Res., 22, 10, pp. 1435-1443, (2012)
[27] Lockwood C., Munn Z., Porritt K., Qualitative research synthesis, Int. J. Evid. Based Healthc., 13, 3, pp. 179-187, (2015)
[28] Sale J.E.M., Et al., Decision to take osteoporosis medication in patients who have had a fracture and are ‘high’ risk for future fracture: a qualitative study, BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 12, (2011)
[29] Lau E., Et al., Patients’ adherence to osteoporosis therapy: exploring the perceptions of postmenopausal women, Can. Fam. Physician, 54, 3, pp. 394-402, (2008)
[30] Wilkins S., Women with osteoporosis: strategies for managing aging and chronic illness, J. Women Aging, 13, 3, pp. 59-77, (2001)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →