'Development and Psychometric Testing of the Lean Management Scale for Nursing Services in Hospitals'

被引:0
作者
Kilic, cigdem Torun [1 ,2 ]
Ozturk, Havva [1 ]
机构
[1] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing Management, Trabzon, Turkiye
[2] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Inst Hlth Sci, Trabzon, Turkiye
关键词
instrument development; lean management; nursing; psychometrics; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; SAMPLE-SIZE; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/ijn.13314
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimThe aim of this study is to develop a new instrument (The Lean Management Scale for Nursing Services in Hospitals- LMS-N) to evaluate the lean levels of nursing services in hospitals and to evaluate its psychometric properties.MethodA three-phase construct was used to develop this scale and to determine its psychometric properties: (1) creating the item pool, (2) preliminarily evaluating items and (3) evaluating psychometric properties. This methodological study evaluated the scale's face, content and construct validities, internal consistency, and temporal stability. The psychometric properties of the scale were tested with a total of 695 nurses in different sample groups. Data were collected between 18 November 2020 and 15 May 2021.ResultsThe scale's content validity index was 0.75. According to principal component analysis, the scale included 22 items and five subdimensions, and the total variance was 60.32%. In confirmatory factor analysis, the fit indices were good or acceptable for this construct. Its internal consistency was good or acceptable according to reliability analysis. Test-retest showed that the scale had temporal stability.ConclusionLean Management Scale in Nursing Services in Hospitals is a valid and reliable tool that can evaluate the level of leanness of nursing services. It provides a comprehensive evaluation with five subdimensions: management support, visual stock management, work environment layout, preventive notification system and waste detection.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] New Modeling Approaches Based on Varimax Rotation of Functional Principal Components
    Acal, Christian
    Aguilera, Ana M.
    Escabias, Manuel
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (11) : 1 - 15
  • [2] Hospital kanban system implementation: Evaluating satisfaction of nursing personnel
    Aguilar-Escobar, Victor G.
    Bourque, Sarah
    Godino-Gallego, Nicolas
    [J]. INVESTIGACIONES EUROPEAS DE DIRECCION Y ECONOMIA DE LA EMPRESA, 2015, 21 (03): : 101 - 110
  • [3] Exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis in clinical studies: Which one should you use?
    Alavi, Mousa
    Visentin, Denis C.
    Thapa, Deependra K.
    Hunt, Glenn E.
    Watson, Roger
    Cleary, Michelle
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (08) : 1886 - 1889
  • [4] Alpar R., 2022, SPOR SALK EITIM BILI
  • [5] Sample size used to validate a scale: A review of publications on newly-developed patient reported outcomes measures
    Anthoine E.
    Moret L.
    Regnault A.
    Sbille V.
    Hardouin J.-B.
    [J]. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12 (1)
  • [6] Ayaad Omar, 2019, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, V20, P1563
  • [7] Editorial: Scale Development and Score Validation
    Badenes-Ribera, Laura
    Silver, N. Clayton
    Pedroli, Elisa
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [8] Barnas K., 2016, SAGLIK SEKTORU ICIN, P23
  • [9] Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer
    Boateng, Godfred O.
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R.
    Young, Sera L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [10] Cronbach's alpha reliability: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, and sample size planning
    Bonett, Douglas G.
    Wright, Thomas A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2015, 36 (01) : 3 - 15