High-load strength training compared with standard care treatment in young adults with joint hypermobility and knee pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the HIPEr-Knee study)

被引:0
作者
Liaghat, Behnam [1 ]
Bojsen-Moller, Jens [1 ]
Juul-Kristensen, Birgit [1 ]
Henriksen, Peter [2 ]
Mohammadnejad, Afsaneh [3 ]
Heiberg, Bibi Dige [1 ]
Thorlund, Jonas Bloch [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Sports Sci & Clin Biomech, Odense, Denmark
[2] Univ Coll Lillebaelt, Dept Appl Hlth Res, Odense, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Epidemiol & Biostat, Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Publ Hlth, Res Unit Gen Practice, Odense, Denmark
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 10期
关键词
knee; randomized controlled trial; rehabilitation medicine; musculoskeletal disorders; pain management; physical therapy modalities; EHLERS-DANLOS-SYNDROME; FORCE DEVELOPMENT; TENDON; MUSCLE; HYPERTROPHY; RELIABILITY; ADAPTATIONS; INTENSITY; STIFFNESS; SYMPTOMS;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090812
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Patients with generalised joint hypermobility, including knee hypermobility (GJHk), often experience knee pain and are typically managed with low-intensity strength training and/or proprioceptive training as part of standard care. However, not all patients experience satisfactory outcomes. High-load strength training may offer additional benefits, such as increased muscle cross-sectional area, neural drive and tendon stiffness, which may reduce pain and improve active knee joint stability during movement tasks and daily activities. So far, no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have compared high-load strength training with traditional treatment strategies (standard care) for this patient group.Methods and analysis In this RCT, we aim to recruit patients with GJHk and knee pain from primary care physiotherapy clinics in the Region of Southern Denmark and via social media. Patients with competing injuries or experience with high-load strength training will be excluded. Patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to either 2 weekly sessions of high-load strength training or standard care for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is self-reported knee pain during an activity nominated by the patient as the most aggravating for their present knee pain measured using the Visual Analogue Scale for Nominated Activity (VASNA, 0-100; 0=no pain and 100=worst imaginable pain). This will be collected at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months. Secondary outcomes include self-reported knee function and adverse events (collected at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months), objective measurements including a 5-repetition maximum single-leg press, proprioception and single-leg-hop for distance (collected at baseline and 12 weeks), and a range of other outcome measures such as fear of movement, tendon stiffness and global perceived effect. We aim to recruit 90 patients in total to detect a 10 mm group difference in the primary outcome with 80% power.Ethics and dissemination This study was funded by Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant number 2034-00088B) on 14 June 2022; the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark approved it (S-20230050) on 30 August 2023. The first recruitment site opened on 15 February 2024, and the final results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal to inform rehabilitation strategies for symptomatic GJHk.Protocol version 1, dated 4 July 2024.Trial registration number NCT06277401.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [21] A supervised exercise intervention during cancer treatment for adolescents and young adults-FiGHTING F!T: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial
    Munsie, Claire
    Ebert, Jay
    Collins, Joanne
    Plaster, Megan
    Joske, David
    Ackland, Timothy
    TRIALS, 2021, 22 (01)
  • [22] Neuromuscular exercise and pain neuroscience education compared with pain neuroscience education alone in patients with chronic pain after primary total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for the NEPNEP randomized controlled trial
    Larsen, Jesper Bie
    Skou, Soren T.
    Arendt-Nielsen, Lars
    Simonsen, Ole
    Madeleine, Pascal
    TRIALS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [23] Auricular acupuncture for primary care treatment of low back pain and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy: study protocol for a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial
    Vas, Jorge
    Manuel Aranda-Regules, Jose
    Modesto, Manuela
    Aguilar, Inmaculada
    Baron-Crespo, Mercedes
    Ramos-Monserrat, Maria
    Quevedo-Carrasco, Manuel
    Rivas-Ruiz, Francisco
    TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [24] DepActive: study protocol for a randomised controlled multicentre trial of telephone-delivered behavioural activation for the treatment of depression in older adults in primary care
    Bystrom, Elin
    Wennlof, Bjorn
    Johansson, Inger
    Lonnberg, Lena
    Arkkukangas, Marina
    Pellas, Johnny
    Damberg, Mattias
    TRIALS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [25] Tailored exercise management (TEMPO) versus usual care for people aged 80 years or older with hip/knee osteoarthritis: study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial
    Nicolson, Philippa J. A.
    Holden, Melanie A.
    Marian, Ioana R.
    Williamson, Esther
    Dutton, Susan J.
    Garrett, Angela
    Hopewell, Sally
    Lamb, Sarah E.
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [26] Efficacy of high-intensity interval training compared with moderate-intensity continuous training on maximal aerobic potency in dogs: Trial protocol for a randomised controlled clinical study
    Orozco, Sonia C.
    Arias, Maria P.
    Carvajal, Pablo A.
    Gallo-Villegas, Jaime
    Olivera-Angel, Martha
    VETERINARY RECORD OPEN, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [27] Pain neuroscience education, blended exercises and booster sessions as an effective therapy for pain, functional and psychological factors in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a study protocol for a single-blind randomised controlled trial with 22 factorial design during 6-month follow-up
    Gholami, Zohreh
    Faezi, Seyedeh Tahereh
    Letafatkar, Amir
    Madreseh, Elham
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [28] Assertive outreach treatment versus care as usual for the treatment of high-need, high-cost alcohol related frequent attenders: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    R. Blackwood
    A. Wolstenholme
    A. Kimergård
    S. Fincham-Campbell
    Z. Khadjesari
    S. Coulton
    S. Byford
    P. Deluca
    S. Jennings
    E. Currell
    J. Dunne
    J. O’Toole
    J. Winnington
    E. Finch
    C. Drummond
    BMC Public Health, 20
  • [29] The study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial of acupuncture versus a sham procedure versus standard care alone for the treatment of delirium in acutely hospitalized older adults with a medical illness
    Levy, Ilana
    Attias, Samuel
    Gavrieli, Sagi
    Oliven, Ron
    Neerland, Bjorn E.
    Devlin, John W.
    Ben-Arye, Eran
    Greenberg, Dan
    Schiff, Elad
    MATURITAS, 2019, 124 : 72 - 80
  • [30] Subdissociative intranasal ketamine plus standard pain therapy versus standard pain therapy in the treatment of paediatric sickle cell disease vaso-occlusive crises in resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Young, James R.
    Sawe, Hendry Robert
    Mfinanga, Juma A.
    Nshom, Ernest
    Helm, Ethan
    Moore, Charity G.
    Runyon, Michael S.
    Reynolds, Stacy L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (07):