Commercial suture passer improves efficiency and ease of use versus conventional needle in minimally invasive thoracolumbar fascia closure: a cadaveric analysis

被引:0
作者
Gallizzi, Michael [1 ]
Smith, Benjamin L. [2 ]
Kemp, Zak [3 ]
Khoury, Anthony N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Steadman Clin, Dept Spine & Neck, Vail, CO USA
[2] Arthrex Inc, Orthoped Res Dept, 1370 Creekside Blvd,Naples, Naples, FL 34108 USA
[3] Arthrex Inc, Dept Spine, Naples, FL USA
来源
NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL | 2024年 / 19卷
关键词
Minimally invasive; Fascia closure; Suture-passing device; Endoscopic surgery; Spine; Thoracolumbar fascia;
D O I
10.1016/j.xnsj.2024.100511
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Low-profile suture passers have been introduced to facilitate thoracolumbar fascia closure in minimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the closure time of a modern suture passer to a conventional curved need for MIS fascia closure in a cadaveric model. Methods: Six clinicians specializing in orthopedic spine surgery were recruited for the study and randomly assigned 1 cadaveric torso. Subcutaneous tissue was resected at L4-L5, replicating MIS surgery, followed by placement of a 60 x 18-mm or 100 x 18-mm tubular retractor for access. Clinicians were required to close the fascia with three unknotted, simple interrupted sutures using a swaged curved needle or suture passer (Spine ScorpionTM TM , Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL). The completion time was recorded, starting immediately before suturing and ending after the last pass. A time cutoff of 10 min was implemented in consideration of reasonable operating room time, and the number of achieved suture passes (of 6) were recorded. Clinicians were asked to qualitatively grade ease of use in relation to prior fascial closure experience per a 0-5 scale, where 0 is impossible and 5 is easiest. Results: The mean change in fascial closure completion time (Delta) Delta ) was significantly reduced with the Spine Scorpion compared to the curved needle with the 60 x 18-mm retractor (Delta=5.80 Delta= 5.80 min; 95% CI, 2.92-8.67 min; p = .004) and 100 x 18-mm retractor (Delta=5.28 Delta= 5.28 min; 95% CI, 2.76-7.80 min; p = .003). Full closure was achieved within the time limit for all trials of the Spine Scorpion, while the standard needle achieved full closure in 67% (4 of 6) and 50% (3 of 6) of trials with the 60 x 18-mm and 100 x 18-mm retractors, respectively. Median ease-of-use scores with the 60 x 18-mm and 100 x 18-mm retractors, respectively, were 4.5 (range, 4-5) and 4.5 (range, 3-5) for the Spine Scorpion, and both 1.0 (range, 1-2) for the curved needle. Conclusion: Results from this laboratory investigation using a suture passer for thoracolumbar fascia closure show a significant reduction in closure time and completion of the procedure compared to a conventional curved needle.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Aguilar Oscar Josue Montes, 2022, Surg Neurol Int, V13, P534, DOI [10.25259/sni_872_2022, 10.25259/SNI_872_2022]
[2]  
Arthrex Inc, 2023, Spine scorpion suture passer for spinal fascia closure
[3]   Ten-Step Minimally Invasive Spine Lumbar Decompression and Dural Repair Through Tubular Retractors [J].
Gillis, Christopher C. .
OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 13 (02) :245-245
[4]   Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for the Treatment of Types B and C Thoracolumbar Injuries: A PRISMA Systematic Review [J].
Carazzo, Charles Andre ;
Yurac, Ratko ;
Guiroy, Alfredo ;
Zamorano, Juan J. ;
Cabrera, Juan P. ;
Joaquim, Andrei F. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (04) :803-810
[5]   Principles and Fundamentals of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery [J].
Del Castillo-Calcaneo, Juan ;
Navarro-Ramirez, Rodrigo ;
Gimenez-Gigon, Maximiliano ;
Adjei, Joshua ;
Damolla, Anwar ;
Nakhla, Jonathan ;
Hernandez, R. Nick ;
Hartl, Roger .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 119 :465-471
[6]  
Foley K T, 1999, Neurosurg Focus, V7, pe5
[7]   Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: An Overview [J].
Goldberg, Jacob L. ;
Hartl, Roger ;
Elowitz, Eric .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 163 :214-227
[8]   Biomechanical considerations of the posterior surgical approach to the lumbar spine [J].
Haupt, Samuel ;
Cornaz, Frederic ;
Falkowski, Anna L. ;
Widmer, Jonas ;
Farshad, Mazda .
SPINE JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (12) :2066-2071
[9]  
Smith T, 2022, Journal of Orthopaedic Business, V2, P10, DOI [10.55576/job.v2i4.23, 10.55576/job.v2i4.23, DOI 10.55576/JOB.V2I4.23]
[10]  
Suter Aline, 2019, J Spine Surg, V5, P358, DOI [10.21037/jss.2019.08.01, 10.21037/jss.2019.08.01]