Technical efficiency in agriculture: A decade-long meta-analysis of global research

被引:0
作者
Ruzhani, Freddy [1 ]
Mushunje, Abbyssinia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ft Hare, Dept Agr Econ & Extens, Private Bag X1314, ZA-5700 Alice, South Africa
关键词
Agricultural productivity; Beta regression; Food insecurity; Meta-analysis; Technical efficiency; REGRESSION; SUBSIDIES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101667
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Poverty and food insecurity remain a glaring reality, particularly in regions linked to dryland agriculture. Low agricultural productivity due to inefficient input use reduces the prospects of improving the circumstances many rural households face due to these challenges. This highlights the need to understand factors affecting efficiency indices from several published studies, including shedding light on whether efficiency has increased over time. In this comprehensive meta-analysis spanning a decade (2014-2023), we shed new light on the evolving landscape of global technical efficiency in the agricultural sector, assuming that the institutional environment has changed over time. The literature search yielded 289 published articles and 549 observations for analysis. The beta regression meta-analysis results indicate that the translog functional form leads to higher mean technical efficiency values than the cobb-Douglas and other functional forms, while panel data studies yield lower mean technical efficiency values than cross-sectional studies. This emphasizes the need to select the most suitable functional form based on the data and model specification tests. Measures should be taken to eliminate selection bias in efficiency-related cross-sectional studies. Technical efficiency in agricultural enterprises globally increases with publication year with an average mean of 0.72. Over the past decade, the major efficiency drivers include farm size, extension support, credit access, and education, influencing efficiency positively, while subsidies have had the greatest negative effect on efficiency. Policies that enhance extension support, credit access, participation of the educated in commercial farming and scaling down of subsidy programs should be strengthened to improve global agricultural productivity.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Assessing technical and scale efficiency of groundnut production in Tolon district of northern Ghana: A nonparametric approach [J].
Anang, Benjamin Tetteh .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD RESEARCH, 2021, 4
[2]   Gender Differences in Time-Poverty in Rural Mozambique [J].
Arora, Diksha .
REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY, 2015, 73 (02) :196-221
[3]   PRISMA Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews [J].
Arya, Shipra ;
Kaji, Amy H. ;
Boermeester, Marja A. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (08) :789-790
[4]   Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions [J].
Baum, Christopher F. .
STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (02) :299-303
[5]   Capital subsidies and the performance of firms [J].
Bergström, F .
SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2000, 14 (03) :183-193
[6]   Why food insecurity persists in sub-Saharan Africa: A review of existing evidence [J].
Bjornlund, Vibeke ;
Bjornlund, Henning ;
van Rooyen, Andre .
FOOD SECURITY, 2022, 14 (04) :845-864
[7]   Technical efficiency in farming:: a meta-regression analysis [J].
Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. ;
Solis, Daniel ;
Moreira Lopez, Victor H. ;
Maripani, Jose F. ;
Thiam, Abdourahmane ;
Rivas, Teodoro .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (01) :57-72
[8]   The Future Challenges of Food and Agriculture: An Integrated Analysis of Trends and Solutions [J].
Calicioglu, Ozgul ;
Flammini, Alessandro ;
Bracco, Stefania ;
Bellu, Lorenzo ;
Sims, Ralph .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (01)
[9]   Agricultural extension and its effects on farm productivity and income: Insight from Northern Ghana [J].
Danso-Abbeam G. ;
Ehiakpor D.S. ;
Aidoo R. .
Agriculture & Food Security, 7 (1)
[10]   Specialisation and economies of scale or diversification and economies of scope? Assessing different agricultural development pathways [J].
de Roest, Kees ;
Ferrari, Paolo ;
Knickel, Karlheinz .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2018, 59 :222-231