Motivation, demographics, and engagement during COVID-19 in an astrobiology massive open online course

被引:0
作者
Grayson, Skylar [1 ]
Simon, Molly N. [1 ]
Buxner, Sanlyn [2 ]
Wenger, Matthew [2 ]
Impey, Chris [2 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Earth & Space Explorat, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Dept Astron, Tucson, AZ USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH | 2025年 / 21卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
STUDENTS; MOOC;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.21.010109
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Massive open online courses (MOOCs) experienced a resurgence in popularity due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In this work, we studied participants in an astrobiology MOOC offered on Coursera since April 2019. Using a modified version of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II, we examined the primary motivational factors of the participants, how those factors related to demographics and course performance, and how participants in our MOOC compared to those in a general astronomy MOOC as well as traditional undergraduate students. Participants in the astrobiology MOOC were more highly motivated when compared to the general astronomy MOOC across all five motivational factors we surveyed: intrinsic, career, grade, self-determination, and self-efficacy. Compared to the undergraduate population, astrobiology MOOC participants reported higher motivations in all the factors except for career and grade. We found that demographics had some impact on these results, with older participants reporting lower career and grade motivations and female participants having generally higher motivations compared to males. Despite this, male participants and those older than 40 were more likely to complete the course. As the astrobiology MOOC was initially offered prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, we also looked at the impact the pandemic had on these results. The demographics of participants changed significantly, with the percentage of participants under the age of 30 and the percentage of those identifying as full-time students doubling compared to prepandemic. The motivations of participants also changed, with participants showing more career and grade motivation since the pandemic. Interestingly, the increase in younger and more full-time student participants has continued even with the return of in-person learning. This suggests that the pandemic introduced MOOCs to a new population of learners who have continued to utilize them in the years since.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Investigating Students' Adoption of MOOCs during COVID-19 Pandemic: Students' Academic Self-Efficacy, Learning Engagement, and Learning Persistence [J].
Alamri, Mahdi Mohammed .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (02)
[2]   The role of motivation in MOOCs' retention rates: a systematic literature review [J].
Badali, Mehdi ;
Hatami, Javad ;
Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem ;
Rahimi, Ebrahim ;
Noroozi, Omid ;
Eslami, Zahra .
RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2022, 17 (01)
[3]   Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement [J].
Barak, Miri ;
Watted, Abeer ;
Haick, Hossam .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2016, 94 :49-60
[4]   Exploratory study of MOOC learners' demographics and motivation: The case of students involved in groups [J].
Bayeck, Rebecca Yvonne .
OPEN PRAXIS, 2016, 8 (03) :223-233
[5]  
Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3
[6]  
Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P297
[7]   The role of students' motivation and participation in predicting performance in a MOOC [J].
de Barba, P. G. ;
Kennedy, G. E. ;
Ainley, M. D. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2016, 32 (03) :218-231
[8]  
Falk J.H., 2006, CURATOR, P151, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00209.x, DOI 10.1111/J.2151-6952.2006.TB00209.X]
[9]  
Falk J.H., 2002, Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education
[10]   Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning [J].
Falk, John H. ;
Storksdieck, Martin ;
Dierking, Lynn D. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (04) :455-469