Comparison of Outcomes after Autologous Breast Reconstruction: Latissimus Dorsi with Immediate Fat Transfer versus Abdominally Based Free Flaps

被引:1
作者
Spoer, Daisy L. [1 ,2 ]
Berger, Lauren E. [1 ,3 ]
Huffman, Samuel S. [1 ,2 ]
Lava, Christian X. [1 ,2 ]
Dekker, Paige K. [4 ]
Ko, JiMin A. [2 ]
Truong, Brian N. [2 ]
Towfighi, Parhom N. [5 ]
Ghyasi, Niloofar [2 ]
Fan, Kenneth L. [1 ]
Song, David H. [1 ]
机构
[1] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Washington, DC USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[3] Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Plast & Reconstruct Surg Div, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[5] UPMC Mercy Hlth Ctr, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DONOR-SITE MORBIDITY; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; CURRENT TRENDS; MASTECTOMY; SATISFACTION; ARTERIAL; SURGERY; RISK; DIEP;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000011400
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Autologous breast reconstruction confers favorable patient reports of satisfaction and quality of life compared with implant-based reconstruction over a lifetime. The latissimus dorsi with immediate fat transfer (LIFT) is an alternative approach to abdominally based free flaps (Ab-FF), which expands fully autologous reconstruction to nonmicrosurgeons. This study compared the 2 procedures concerning their clinical and patient-reported outcomes 1 year postoperatively. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of LIFTs and Ab-FFs performed between March of 2017 and August of 2022. The primary outcomes were postoperative complications, reoperations, and longitudinal BREAST-Q scores. BREAST-Q modules included Satisfaction with Breasts, Satisfaction with Abdomen, Satisfaction with Back, Psychosocial Well-being, Physical Well-being: Chest, Physical Well-being: Abdomen, Physical Well-being: Back, and Sexual Well-being. Results: Of the 281 included patients (408 breasts), 211 received Ab-FF and 70 received LIFT. One-year follow-up (median [interquartile range], 12 [12] months) demonstrated that Ab-FF independently predicted dehiscence, reoperation procedures, and revisional surgery. LIFT independently increased the odds of seroma. Obesity predicted dehiscence, and bilateral reconstructions predicted revisional fat grafting. BREAST-Q scores fluctuated over time but were similar across all measured domains by 1 year postoperatively. Conclusions: Although Ab-FF is the standard approach for fully autologous reconstruction, LIFT procedures may be associated with a less complicated postoperative course while eliciting similar patient-reported outcomes. LIFT may be preferred to limit postoperative complications, particularly in patients with obesity. LIFT can be used by plastic surgeons who are not trained in microsurgical procedures or do not have an environment that fosters Ab-FF.
引用
收藏
页码:27S / 40S
页数:14
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [21] Latissimus Dorsi and Immediate Fat Transfer (LIFT) for Complete Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Economides, James M.
    Song, David H.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (01)
  • [22] Which Breast Is the Best? Successful Autologous or Alloplastic Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcomes
    Eltahir, Yassir
    Werners, Lisanne L. C. H.
    Dreise, Marieke M.
    van Emmichoven, Ingeborg A. Zeiffmans
    Werker, Paul M. N.
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 135 (01) : 43 - 50
  • [23] Breast reconstruction using the Latissimus Dorsi Flap and Immediate Fat Transfer (LIFT): A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Escandon, Joseph M.
    Escandon, Lauren
    Ahmed, Aabra
    Weiss, Anna
    Nazerali, Rahim
    Ciudad, Pedro
    Langstein, Howard N.
    Manrique, Oscar J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (11) : 4106 - 4116
  • [24] Gabapentin Decreases Narcotic Usage: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway in Free Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Luvisa, Kyle
    Black, Cara K.
    Wirth, Peter
    Nigam, Manas
    Camden, Rachel
    Lee, Dong Won
    Myers, Joseph
    Song, David H.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (08)
  • [25] Autologous vs Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction Where Do We Stand?
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Song, David H.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (10) : 899 - 900
  • [26] Fat Grafting as Regenerative Surgery: A Current Review
    Firriolo, Joseph M.
    Conde-Green, Alexandra
    Pu, Lee L. Q.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 150 (06) : 1340E - 1347E
  • [27] Pushing the DIEP Envelope with ERAS: 24 Hour Discharge is Safe in Appropriately Selected Patients
    Fracol, Megan
    Teven, Chad M.
    Selimos, Brianna
    Wier, Sylvia
    Stockslager, Caitlin
    Schoenfeldt, Joseph
    Connors, Paul
    Monahan, Denise
    Dumanian, Gregory A.
    Howard, Michael A.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (06) : E5070
  • [28] Fracon S., 2018, Acta Chir. Plast, V59, P120
  • [29] Current Trends in Breast Reconstruction Survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010
    Gurunluoglu, Raffi
    Gurunluoglu, Aslin
    Williams, Susan A.
    Tebockhorst, Seth
    [J]. ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 70 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [30] Reconstructive Burnout after Mastectomy: Implications for Patient Selection
    Halani, Sameer H. H.
    Jones, Kaitlin
    Liu, Yulun
    Teotia, Sumeet S. S.
    Haddock, Nicholas T. T.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2023, 151 (01) : E13 - E19