Sensory preservation in reduction mammoplasty using the nipple-areola complex-carrying pedicle technique for gigantomastia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Bonomi, F. [1 ,2 ]
Harder, Y. [3 ,4 ]
Treglia, G. [5 ]
Limido, E. [2 ,6 ]
De Monti, M. [1 ]
Parodi, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ente Osped Cantonale EOC, Osped Regionale Lugano, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, Lugano, Switzerland
[2] Saarland Univ, Inst Clin & Expt Surg, Homburg, Germany
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Vaudois CHUV, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg & Hand Surg, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Univ Lausanne UNIL, Fac Biol & Med, Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Ente Osped Cantonale EOC, Div Med Educ & Res, Bellinzona, Switzerland
[6] Ente Osped Cantonale EOC, Osped Beata Vergine Mendrisio, Dept Surg, Mendrisio, Switzerland
来源
JPRAS OPEN | 2025年 / 43卷
关键词
NAC-carrying pedicle technique; Free nipple graft; Gigantomastia; Meta-analysis; Reduction mammoplasty; Sensation; BREAST REDUCTION; SUPEROMEDIAL PEDICLE; INFERIOR PEDICLE; BODY-IMAGE; MACROMASTIA; SENSATION; OUTCOMES; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpra.2024.11.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gigantomastia is a disabling condition characterized by excess breast tissue. Historically, free nipple graft (FNG) has been preferred, prioritizing the nipple-areola complex (NAC) vascularity. The NAC-carrying pedicle technique, which is most commonly used in case of hypertrophy of the breast, has been suggested as a viable alternative for gigantomastia according to recent evidence, with reduced rates of NAC necrosis and improved outcomes. Nevertheless, a detailed outcome evaluation of the technique in terms of sensory preservation is currently lacking. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the risk of sensory loss associated with the NAC-carrying pedicle technique in cases of gigantomastia. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a literature search identified studies reporting postoperative sensitivity with the NACcarrying pedicle technique in resections exceeding 10 0 0 g of adipoglandular tissue. Then, a proportion meta-analysis was conducted to assess the pooled rate of sensation loss through the NACcarrying pedicle technique. Results: Seventeen studies (843 patients, 1685 breasts) met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed an exceptionally low risk of sensory loss with the NAC-carrying pedicle technique (1.3%; 95% confidence interval: 0.7-2.0), without significant statistical heterogeneity. Conclusion: This study provides the first comprehensive evaluation of sensory preservation with the NAC-carrying pedicle technique in gigantomastia. The NAC-carrying pedicle technique emerges as the first choice, offering safety and favorable functional outcomes. Surgical caution remains crucial with the option to switch to FNG as required, ensuring patient safety and procedure success. Further research on the impact of different NAC-carrying pedicle techniques on sensory preservation is warranted. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 163
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Al-Shaham Aa, 2010, Can J Plast Surg, V18, pe1
[2]   Vertical Reduction Mammaplasty Combined With a Superomedial Pedicle in Gigantomastia [J].
Amini, Peymaneh ;
Stasch, Tilman ;
Theodorou, Panagiotis ;
Altintas, Ahmed Ali ;
Spilker, Gerald .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2010, 64 (03) :279-285
[3]  
Ashour Tarek, 2018, Electron Physician, V10, P7230, DOI 10.19082/7230
[4]   Ultrasonographically Determined Pedicled Breast Reduction in Severe Gigantomastia [J].
Basaran, Karaca ;
Ucar, Adem ;
Guven, Erdem ;
Arinci, Atilla ;
Yazar, Memet ;
Kuvat, Samet Vasfi .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 128 (04) :252E-259E
[5]   Inferior and Central Mound Pedicle Breast Reduction in Gigantomastia: A Safe Alternative? [J].
Bilgen, Fatma ;
Ural, Alper ;
Bekerecioglu, Mehmet .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (04) :401-407
[6]   Is free nipple grafting necessary in patients undergoing reduction mammoplasty for gigantomastia? A systematic review and meta [J].
Bonomi, Francesca ;
Harder, Yves ;
Treglia, Giorgio ;
De Monti, Marco ;
Parodi, Corrado .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2024, 89 :144-153
[7]   Why Choose the Septum-Supero-Medial (SSM)-Based Mammaplasty in Patients with Severe Breast Ptosis: An Anatomical Point of View [J].
Bucaria, V. ;
Elia, R. ;
Maruccia, M. ;
Annoscia, P. ;
Boccuzzi, A. ;
Giudice, G. .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2018, 42 (06) :1439-1446
[8]   Reduction mammaplasty: The results of avoiding nipple-areolar amputation in cases of extreme hypertrophy [J].
Chang, P ;
Shaaban, AF ;
Canady, JW ;
Ricciardelli, EJ ;
Cram, AE .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1996, 37 (06) :585-591
[9]  
Chetty V, 2016, S AFR J SURG, V54, P46
[10]   Breast Sensitivity Before and After the L Short-Scar Mammaplasty [J].
Chiari, Armando, Jr. ;
Nunes, Tarcizo A. ;
Grotting, James C. ;
Cotta, Fernando B. ;
Gomes, Rafael C. B. .
AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 36 (01) :105-114