Combined holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with high-intensity focused ultrasound in treating patients with localized prostate cancer in a prostate with volume > 60 g: Oncological and functional outcomes from single-institution study

被引:0
|
作者
Ajami, Tarek [1 ]
Blachman-Braun, Ruben [1 ]
Porto, Joao G. [1 ]
Ritch, Chad R. [1 ]
Gonzalgo, Mark L. [1 ]
Punnen, Sanoj [1 ]
Shah, Hemendra N. [1 ]
Parekh, Dipen J. [1 ]
Nahar, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Desai Sethi Urol Inst, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL 33146 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Focal therapy; Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of combined High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) in treating patients with both localized prostate cancer (PCa) and prostate > 60 g. Methods: All patients who underwent HIFU for treatment of localized PCa were prospectively enrolled in our study. We reviewed records of patients undergoing procedures from January 2016 to January 2023. For patients with prostate sizes > 60 g, HoLEP was offered before HIFU to prevent worsened urinary symptoms post-treatment. Oncological outcomes-prostatic-specific (PSA) kinetics, recurrence rates, treatment failure - and functional results-Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), and urinary complications were compared between patients undergoing combined HoLEP and HIFU with those underwent HIFU-monotherapy. Results: Among 100 patients, 74 underwent HIFU-monotherapy and 26 underwent the combined HoLEP and HIFU. The majority had intermediate-risk PCa (67%). Pathologic assessment of HoLEP specimens showed no tumor evidence in 57% of cases. In comparison to the HIFU-only group, the combined group exhibited significantly lower PSA metrics across various intervals, however, no differences were found regarding overall and infield recurrences and treatment failure rates. While the combined treatment initially resulted in higher incontinence rates and shorter catheterization durations (P < 0.001), no significant difference in IPSS was observed during subsequent follow-ups. Conclusion: HoLEP and HIFU can be safely combined for the treatment of PCa in patients with >60 g prostate volume without compromising early oncological outcomes thereby expanding the therapeutic scope of HIFU in treating patients with localized PCa and large adenomas.
引用
收藏
页码:289e1 / 289e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] High-Intensity Focused-Ultrasound Focal Therapy Versus Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparison of Oncological and Functional Outcomes in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients
    Nyk, Lukasz
    Michalak, Wojciech
    Szemplinski, Stanislaw
    Wozniak, Rafal
    Zagozdzon, Bartlomiej
    Krajewski, Wojciech
    Kryst, Piotr
    Kamecki, Hubert
    Poletajew, Slawomir
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [42] Morbidity associated with repeated transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Andreas Blana
    Sebastian Rogenhofer
    Roman Ganzer
    Peter J. Wild
    Wolf F. Wieland
    Bernhard Walter
    World Journal of Urology, 2006, 24 : 585 - 590
  • [43] Morbidity associated with repeated transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment of localized prostate cancer
    Blana, Andreas
    Rogenhofer, Sebastian
    Ganzer, Roman
    Wild, Peter J.
    Wieland, Wolf F.
    Walter, Bernhard
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 24 (05) : 585 - 590
  • [44] Complete high-intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer: outcome from the @-Registry
    A Blana
    C N Robertson
    S C W Brown
    C Chaussy
    S Crouzet
    A Gelet
    G N Conti
    R Ganzer
    G Pasticier
    S Thuroff
    J F Ward
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2012, 15 : 256 - 259
  • [45] Oncological Outcome and Value of Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Focal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Rosenhammer, Bernd
    Niessen, Christoph
    Rotzinger, Laura
    Reiss, Julian
    Schnabel, Marco J.
    Burger, Maximilian
    Bruendl, Johannes
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2019, 103 (03) : 270 - 278
  • [46] Improved Outcomes with Advancements in High Intensity Focused Ultrasound Devices for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer
    Uchida, Toyoaki
    Tomonaga, Tetsuro
    Kim, Hakushi
    Nakano, Mayura
    Shoji, Sunao
    Nagata, Yoshihiro
    Terachi, Toshiro
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (01) : 103 - 110
  • [47] Single-center, prospective phase 2 trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with unilateral localized prostate cancer: good functional results but oncologically not as safe as expected
    Duwe, Gregor
    Boehm, Katharina
    Haack, Maximilian
    Sparwasser, Peter
    Brandt, Maximilian Peter
    Mager, Rene
    Tsaur, Igor
    Haferkamp, Axel
    Hoefner, Thomas
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (05) : 1293 - 1299
  • [48] Single-center, prospective phase 2 trial of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with unilateral localized prostate cancer: good functional results but oncologically not as safe as expected
    Gregor Duwe
    Katharina Boehm
    Maximilian Haack
    Peter Sparwasser
    Maximilian Peter Brandt
    Rene Mager
    Igor Tsaur
    Axel Haferkamp
    Thomas Höfner
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 1293 - 1299
  • [49] Focal high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy for localized prostate cancer: An interim analysis of the multinational FASST study
    Ladjevardi, Sam
    Ebner, Anna
    Femic, Aleksandar
    Huebner, Nicolai A.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Kraler, Simon
    Kubik-Huch, Rahel A.
    Ahlman, Rafaele C.
    Haeggman, Michael
    Hefermehl, Lukas J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2024, 54 (06)
  • [50] Salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound versus salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a comparative study of oncological, functional, and toxicity outcomes
    Brecht Devos
    Walid Al Hajj Obeid
    Colin Andrianne
    Romain Diamand
    Alexandre Peltier
    Wouter Everaerts
    Hein Van Poppel
    Roland Van Velthoven
    Steven Joniau
    World Journal of Urology, 2019, 37 : 1507 - 1515