Combined holmium laser enucleation of the prostate with high-intensity focused ultrasound in treating patients with localized prostate cancer in a prostate with volume > 60 g: Oncological and functional outcomes from single-institution study

被引:0
|
作者
Ajami, Tarek [1 ]
Blachman-Braun, Ruben [1 ]
Porto, Joao G. [1 ]
Ritch, Chad R. [1 ]
Gonzalgo, Mark L. [1 ]
Punnen, Sanoj [1 ]
Shah, Hemendra N. [1 ]
Parekh, Dipen J. [1 ]
Nahar, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Desai Sethi Urol Inst, Miller Sch Med, Miami, FL 33146 USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; High-intensity focused ultrasound; Focal therapy; Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.022
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of combined High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate (HoLEP) in treating patients with both localized prostate cancer (PCa) and prostate > 60 g. Methods: All patients who underwent HIFU for treatment of localized PCa were prospectively enrolled in our study. We reviewed records of patients undergoing procedures from January 2016 to January 2023. For patients with prostate sizes > 60 g, HoLEP was offered before HIFU to prevent worsened urinary symptoms post-treatment. Oncological outcomes-prostatic-specific (PSA) kinetics, recurrence rates, treatment failure - and functional results-Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), and urinary complications were compared between patients undergoing combined HoLEP and HIFU with those underwent HIFU-monotherapy. Results: Among 100 patients, 74 underwent HIFU-monotherapy and 26 underwent the combined HoLEP and HIFU. The majority had intermediate-risk PCa (67%). Pathologic assessment of HoLEP specimens showed no tumor evidence in 57% of cases. In comparison to the HIFU-only group, the combined group exhibited significantly lower PSA metrics across various intervals, however, no differences were found regarding overall and infield recurrences and treatment failure rates. While the combined treatment initially resulted in higher incontinence rates and shorter catheterization durations (P < 0.001), no significant difference in IPSS was observed during subsequent follow-ups. Conclusion: HoLEP and HIFU can be safely combined for the treatment of PCa in patients with >60 g prostate volume without compromising early oncological outcomes thereby expanding the therapeutic scope of HIFU in treating patients with localized PCa and large adenomas.
引用
收藏
页码:289e1 / 289e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of Focal Therapy with High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer
    Kuru, Timur H.
    van Essen, Julius
    Pfister, David
    Porres, Daniel
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 38 (12) : 634 - 638
  • [32] Single application of high-intensity focused ultrasound as primary therapy of localized prostate cancer: Treatment-related predictors of biochemical outcomes
    Pfeiffer, Dietrich
    Berger, Juergen
    Gross, Andreas
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 2 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [33] Salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound for locally recurrent prostate cancer after low-dose-rate brachytherapy: oncological and functional outcomes
    Hostiou, Thomas
    Gelet, Albert
    Chapelon, Jean-Yves
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Mege-Lechevalier, Florence
    Lafon, Cyril
    Tonoli-Catez, Helene
    Badet, Lionel
    Crouzet, Sebastien
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 124 (05) : 746 - 757
  • [34] Oncologic and Functional Outcomes of Partial Gland Ablation with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Bass, Roman
    Fleshner, Neil
    Finelli, Antonio
    Barkin, Jack
    Zhang, Liying
    Klotz, Laurence
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (01) : 113 - 119
  • [35] High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. From total to focal ablation
    Aboyan, I. A.
    Pakus, S. M.
    Badyan, K., I
    Hasigov, A., V
    Galstyan, A. M.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2020, 16 (03): : 153 - 164
  • [36] Prostate cancer outcomes following whole-gland and focal high-intensity focused ultrasound
    Parry, Matthew G.
    Sujenthiran, Arunan
    Nossiter, Julie
    Morris, Melanie
    Berry, Brendan
    Nathan, Arjun
    Aggarwal, Ajay
    Payne, Heather
    van der Meulen, Jan
    Clarke, Noel W.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 132 (05) : 568 - 574
  • [37] A Whole of Population, Multiuser Series of High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Management of Localized Prostate Cancer: Outcomes and Implications
    Bolton, Damien
    Ong, Kevin
    Giles, Graham
    Severi, Gianluca
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Papa, Nathan
    Troy, Andrew
    Woo, Henry
    Millar, Jeremy
    Royce, Peter
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2015, 29 (07) : 844 - 849
  • [38] Salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound versus salvage radical prostatectomy for radiation-recurrent prostate cancer: a comparative study of oncological, functional, and toxicity outcomes
    Devos, Brecht
    Obeid, Walid Al Hajj
    Andrianne, Colin
    Diamand, Romain
    Peltier, Alexandre
    Everaerts, Wouter
    Van Poppel, Hein
    Van Velthoven, Roland
    Joniau, Steven
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (08) : 1507 - 1515
  • [39] Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: Eight-year experience
    Uchida, Toyoaki
    Shoji, Sunao
    Nakano, Mayura
    Hongo, Satoko
    Nitta, Masahiro
    Murota, Akiko
    Nagata, Yoshihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 16 (11) : 881 - 886
  • [40] Complete high-intensity focused ultrasound in prostate cancer: outcome from the @-Registry
    Blana, A.
    Robertson, C. N.
    Brown, S. C. W.
    Chaussy, C.
    Crouzet, S.
    Gelet, A.
    Conti, G. N.
    Ganzer, R.
    Pasticier, G.
    Thuroff, S.
    Ward, J. F.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2012, 15 (03) : 256 - 259