WHO'S THE REAL FEMINIST? FEMINIST DISCURSIVE BOUNDARY MAKING IN THE CONTEXT OF ANTI-GENDER CAMPAIGNS

被引:2
作者
Jacobsson, Kerstin [1 ]
Karlberg, Eva [2 ]
Korolczuk, Elzbieta [3 ,4 ]
Meeuwisse, Anna [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gothenburg, Sociol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sodertorn Univ, Sociol, Huddinge, Sweden
[3] Sodertorn Univ, Huddinge, Sweden
[4] Univ Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
[5] Lund Univ, Social Work, Lund, Sweden
关键词
POLITICS; CONTENTION; MOVEMENTS; WORK; BODY; WARS; UK;
D O I
10.17813/1086-671X-29-4-561
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
In recent years, there has been a wave of opposition to feminism, gender equality, and minority rights in various national and international contexts. While there is a growing number of works that examine anti-gender campaigns, less attention has been devoted to the potential consequences of the anti-gender mobilizations for the internal relations within socially progressive (feminist and LGBTQ+) organizations. The present article examines how the discursive boundary making within the progressive camp unfolds in the context of increased polarization around gender in two countries: Italy and Sweden. Instead of adopting a movement-countermovement view, we propose conceptualizing the discursive struggles around gender through the lens of a "field of contention." Such a perspective allows us to see that the field of contention around gender is currently undergoing an intense process of transformation: the discursive boundaries between the feminist movement and the anti-gender movement have become increasingly blurred, and there are instances of discursive overlap between these two broad communities, which at times lead to cooperation across the boundary, all the while strengthening divisions within progressive movements.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 579
页数:19
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 43. Accredited Health Departments | CDC. Published December 11, 2023. Accessed February 26, 2024$4. https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/accreditation/departments.html
[2]  
[Anonymous], Qatar Fund for Development. 2021. Accessed March 24, 2023. https://qatarfund.org.qa/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/QFFD-AR-2020-ENG1april.pdf.
[3]  
Beccalli Bianca, 1994, New Left Review, VI
[4]   Contestation about Collaboration: Discursive Boundary Work among Professions [J].
Bucher, Silke V. ;
Chreim, Samia ;
Langley, Ann ;
Reay, Trish .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2016, 37 (04) :497-522
[5]   'We are in Complete Agreement': The Diversity Issue, Disagreement and Change in the European Women's Lobby [J].
Bygnes, Susanne .
SOCIAL MOVEMENT STUDIES, 2013, 12 (02) :199-213
[6]   The use of religion by populist parties: the case of Italy and its broader implications [J].
Caiani, Manuela ;
Carvalho, Tiago .
RELIGION STATE & SOCIETY, 2021, 49 (03) :211-230
[7]  
Carby H., 2007, CCCS Selected Working Papers, V2, P753
[8]   Generations in the Feminist and LGBT Movements in Italy: The Case of Non Una Di Meno [J].
Chironi, Daniela .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2019, 63 (10) :1469-1496
[9]   Feminist alliances: the ideas, practices and politics of intersectional solidarity [J].
Ciccia, Rossella ;
Della Porta, Donatella ;
Pavan, Elena .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICS AND GENDER, 2021, 4 (02) :175-179
[10]   Transfeminist politics and populist counterattacks in Italy [J].
Cossutta, Carlotta .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENGLISH STUDIES, 2021, 25 (02) :154-171