Assessing Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Developing a Novel Survey Tool for Assessment and Evaluation

被引:1
作者
Webster, Sarah [1 ]
Robertson, Madison [1 ,2 ]
Keresztes, Christian [3 ]
Puxty, John [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Providence Care Hosp, Ctr Studies Aging & Hlth, Kingston, ON, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Sch Nursing, Hlth Qual Programs, Kingston, ON, Canada
[3] St Lawrence Coll, Sch Community Serv, Kingston, ON, Canada
[4] Queens Univ, Dept Med, Kingston, ON, Canada
关键词
Active aging; Age-friendly environments; Evaluation; Measurement; Survey design; INDICATORS; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1093/geront/gnae146
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: Age-friendly community initiatives (AFCIs) have gained recognition as essential responses to the needs of aging populations. Despite their growing significance, there is a notable lack of effective measurement tools to assess the planning, implementation, and sustainability of AFCIs. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a survey tool for evaluating AFCIs. Research Design and Methods: A sequential exploratory mixed-method design was used in 2 phases. First, we identified key themes from interviews with AFCI leads to generate AFCI survey items and regional workshops. Then, we conducted a pilot of the survey and assessed its measurement properties. Results: Thematic analysis of interviews with 68 key informants from 58 AFCIs revealed 4 main themes: AFCI priorities, enablers, challenges, and benefits. These themes, combined with feedback from AFCI stakeholders at the regional workshops and an AFCI conference, informed the development and refinement of a reliable and valid AFCI survey in 2019, supported by a high Cronbach's alpha value (alpha = 0.881). Steps were identified to maintain and sustain the AFCI survey over time. Discussion and Implications: The survey accommodates AFCIs' diverse demographics, governance structures, and priorities with a standardized and flexible approach for effective measurement. This research contributes to the academic understanding of AFCIs and aids community leaders and policy-makers in planning, implementing, and evaluating AFCIs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Face Validity A Critical but Ignored Component of Scale Construction in Psychological Assessment [J].
Allen, Mark S. ;
Robson, Davina A. ;
Iliescu, Dragos .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2023, 39 (03) :153-156
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Microsoft Excel (Version 2016)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2024, About the global network for age-friendly cities and communities
[5]   Developing Age-Friendly Cities: an Evidence-Based Evaluation Tool [J].
Buckner, Stefanie ;
Pope, Daniel ;
Mattocks, Calum ;
Lafortune, Louise ;
Dherani, Mukesh ;
Bruce, Nigel .
JOURNAL OF POPULATION AGEING, 2019, 12 (02) :203-223
[6]  
Centre for Studies in Aging and Health (CSAH), 2023, Ontario age-friendly communities outreach program
[7]  
Centre for Studies in Aging and Health (CSAH), 2023, Age-friendly community initiative in Ontario
[8]   Review of Assessment Tools for Baseline and Follow-up Measurement of Age-Friendliness [J].
Dellamora, Michelle C. ;
Zecevic, Aleksandra A. ;
Baxter, Donna ;
Cramp, Anita ;
Fitzsimmons, Deborah ;
Kloseck, Marita .
AGEING INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 40 (02) :149-164
[9]   Age-friendliness of living environments from the older person's viewpoint: development of the Age-Friendly Environment Assessment Tool [J].
Garner, Ian W. ;
Holland, Carol A. .
AGE AND AGEING, 2020, 49 (02) :193-198
[10]  
Government of Ontario, 2021, Creating a more inclusive Ontario: Age-friendly community planning guide for municipalities and community organizations