Artificial intelligence-assisted academic writing: recommendations for ethical use

被引:4
作者
Cheng, Adam [1 ,2 ]
Calhoun, Aaron [3 ,4 ]
Reedy, Gabriel [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Alberta Childrens Hosp, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Pediat, 28 Oki Dr NW, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Alberta Childrens Hosp, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, 28 Oki Dr NW, Calgary, AB T3B 6A8, Canada
[3] Univ Louisville Sch Med, Sch Med, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Norton Childrens Med Grp, Louisville, KY USA
[5] Kings Coll London, Fac Life Sci & Med, London, England
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Large language models; ChatGPT; Academic writing; Ethics; CHATGPT;
D O I
10.1186/s41077-025-00350-6
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been selectively adopted across the academic community to help researchers complete tasks in a more efficient manner. The widespread release of the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) platform in 2022 has made these tools more accessible to scholars around the world. Despite their tremendous potential, studies have uncovered that large language model (LLM)-based generative AI tools have issues with plagiarism, AI hallucinations, and inaccurate or fabricated references. This raises legitimate concern about the utility, accuracy, and integrity of AI when used to write academic manuscripts. Currently, there is little clear guidance for healthcare simulation scholars outlining the ways that generative AI could be used to legitimately support the production of academic literature. In this paper, we discuss how widely available, LLM-powered generative AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT) can help in the academic writing process. We first explore how academic publishers are positioning the use of generative AI tools and then describe potential issues with using these tools in the academic writing process. Finally, we discuss three categories of specific ways generative AI tools can be used in an ethically sound manner and offer four key principles that can help guide researchers to produce high-quality research outputs with the highest of academic integrity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing [J].
Alkaissi, Hussam ;
McFarlane, Samy I. .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (02)
[2]  
amperetranslations, How good is ChatGPT at translating?
[3]   Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References [J].
Athaluri, Sai Anirudh ;
Manthena, Sandeep Varma ;
Kesapragada, V. S. R. Krishna Manoj ;
Yarlagadda, Vineel ;
Dave, Tirth ;
Duddumpudi, Rama Tulasi Siri .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (04)
[4]  
bardai.ai, The plagiarism problem: how generative ai models reproduce copyrighted content
[5]   The role of using ChatGPT AI in writing medical scientific articles [J].
Benichou, L. .
JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (05)
[6]   High Rates of Fabricated and Inaccurate References in ChatGPT-Generated Medical Content [J].
Bhattacharyya, Mehul ;
Miller, Valerie M. ;
Bhattacharyya, Debjani ;
Miller, Larry E. .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (05)
[7]   The Readiness of ChatGPT to Write Scientific Case Reports Independently: A Comparative Evaluation Between Human and Artificial Intelligence [J].
Buholayka, Maryam ;
Zouabi, Rama ;
Tadinada, Aditya .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (05)
[8]   From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing [J].
Dergaa, Ismail ;
Chamari, Karim ;
Zmijewski, Piotr ;
Saad, Helmi Ben .
BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2023, 40 (02) :615-622
[9]  
Editors ICoMJ, 2025, Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals
[10]  
Ferrer J, 2024, How transformers work: a detailed exploration of transformer architecture