Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor

被引:4
作者
Balch, Jeremy A. [1 ,2 ]
Chatham, A. Hayes [2 ]
Hong, Philip K. W. [1 ]
Manganiello, Lauren [3 ]
Baskaran, Naveen [4 ]
Bihorac, Azra [4 ]
Shickel, Benjamin [4 ]
Moseley, Ray E. [4 ]
Loftus, Tyler J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Biomed Informat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Med, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2024年 / 7卷
关键词
machine learn; palliative care; patient reported outcome; fairness; clinical decision support; MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS; TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING; CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL OUTCOMES; OSTEOCHONDRAL ALLOGRAFT; INCAPACITATED PATIENTS; CARTILAGE DEFECTS; OF-LIFE; KNEE; IMPROVEMENTS; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.3389/frai.2024.1477447
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background The algorithmic patient preference predictor (PPP) has been proposed to aid in decision making for incapacitated patients in the absence of advanced directives. Ethical and legal challenges aside, multiple practical barriers exist for building a personalized PPP. Here, we examine previous work using machine learning to predict patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for capacitated patients undergoing diverse procedures, therapies, and life events. Demonstrating robust performance in predicting PROMs for capacitated patients could suggest opportunities for developing a model tailored to incapacitated ones.Methods We performed a scoping review of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to capture studies using machine learning to predict PROMs following a medical event alongside qualitative studies exploring a theoretical PPP.Results Sixty-eight studies used machine learning to evaluate PROMs; an additional 20 studies focused on a theoretical PPP. For PROMs, orthopedic surgeries (n = 33) and spinal surgeries (n = 12) were the most common medical event. Studies used demographic (n = 30), pre-event PROMs (n = 52), comorbidities (n = 29), social determinants of health (n = 30), and intraoperative variables (n = 124) as predictors. Thirty-four different PROMs were used as the target outcome. Evaluation metrics varied by task, but performance was overall poor to moderate for the best reported scores. In models that used feature importance, pre-event PROMs were the most predictive of post-event PROMs. Fairness assessments were rare (n = 6). These findings reinforce the necessity of the integrating patient values and preferences, beyond demographic factors, to improve the development of personalized PPP models for incapacitated patients.Conclusion The primary objective of a PPP is to estimate patient-reported quality of life following an intervention. Use of machine learning to predict PROMs for capacitated patients introduces challenges and opportunities for building a personalized PPP for incapacitated patients without advanced directives.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 98 条
[11]   Predicting patient-reported outcome of activities of daily living in stroke rehabilitation: a machine learning study [J].
Chen, Yu-Wen ;
Lin, Keh-chung ;
Li, Yi-chun ;
Lin, Chia-Jung .
JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2023, 20 (01)
[12]  
Coley R Yates, 2021, J Affect Disord Rep, V6, P100198, DOI 10.1016/j.jadr.2021.100198
[13]   The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial [J].
Detering, Karen M. ;
Hancock, Andrew D. ;
Reade, Michael C. ;
Silvester, William .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 :847
[14]   Predicting End-of-Life Treatment Preferences: Perils and Practicalities [J].
Ditto, Peter H. ;
Clark, Cory J. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2014, 39 (02) :196-204
[15]   Predictive Analytics for Inpatient Postoperative Opioid Use in Patients Undergoing Mastectomy [J].
Dolendo, Isabella M. ;
Wallace, Anne M. ;
Armani, Ava ;
Waterman, Ruth S. ;
Said, Engy T. ;
Gabriel, Rodney A. .
CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (03)
[16]   A Personalized Patient Preference Predictor for Substituted Judgments in Healthcare: Technically Feasible and Ethically Desirable [J].
Earp, Brian D. ;
Mann, Sebastian Porsdam ;
Allen, Jemima ;
Salloch, Sabine ;
Suren, Vynn ;
Jongsma, Karin ;
Braun, Matthias ;
Wilkinson, Dominic ;
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter ;
Rid, Annette ;
Wendler, David ;
Savulescu, Julian .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS, 2024, 24 (07) :13-26
[17]   Meta-surrogate decision making and artificial intelligence [J].
Earp, Brian D. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 48 (05) :287-289
[18]   Enough - The failure of the living will [J].
Fagerlin, A ;
Schneider, CE .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2004, 34 (02) :30-42
[19]   Predictors of Patient Satisfaction Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Results from a Traditional Statistical Model and a Machine Learning Algorithm [J].
Farooq, Hassan ;
Deckard, Evan R. ;
Ziemba-Davis, Mary ;
Madsen, Adam ;
Meneghini, R. Michael .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (11) :3123-3130
[20]   Ethics of the algorithmic prediction of goal of care preferences: from theory to practice [J].
Ferrario, Andrea ;
Gloeckler, Sophie ;
Biller-Andorno, Nikola .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 49 (03) :165-174