Predicting patient reported outcome measures: a scoping review for the artificial intelligence-guided patient preference predictor

被引:3
作者
Balch, Jeremy A. [1 ,2 ]
Chatham, A. Hayes [2 ]
Hong, Philip K. W. [1 ]
Manganiello, Lauren [3 ]
Baskaran, Naveen [4 ]
Bihorac, Azra [4 ]
Shickel, Benjamin [4 ]
Moseley, Ray E. [4 ]
Loftus, Tyler J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Surg, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Hlth Outcomes & Biomed Informat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[4] Univ Florida, Dept Med, Gainesville, FL USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 2024年 / 7卷
关键词
machine learn; palliative care; patient reported outcome; fairness; clinical decision support; MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHMS; TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING; CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL OUTCOMES; OSTEOCHONDRAL ALLOGRAFT; INCAPACITATED PATIENTS; CARTILAGE DEFECTS; OF-LIFE; KNEE; IMPROVEMENTS; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.3389/frai.2024.1477447
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Background The algorithmic patient preference predictor (PPP) has been proposed to aid in decision making for incapacitated patients in the absence of advanced directives. Ethical and legal challenges aside, multiple practical barriers exist for building a personalized PPP. Here, we examine previous work using machine learning to predict patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for capacitated patients undergoing diverse procedures, therapies, and life events. Demonstrating robust performance in predicting PROMs for capacitated patients could suggest opportunities for developing a model tailored to incapacitated ones.Methods We performed a scoping review of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines to capture studies using machine learning to predict PROMs following a medical event alongside qualitative studies exploring a theoretical PPP.Results Sixty-eight studies used machine learning to evaluate PROMs; an additional 20 studies focused on a theoretical PPP. For PROMs, orthopedic surgeries (n = 33) and spinal surgeries (n = 12) were the most common medical event. Studies used demographic (n = 30), pre-event PROMs (n = 52), comorbidities (n = 29), social determinants of health (n = 30), and intraoperative variables (n = 124) as predictors. Thirty-four different PROMs were used as the target outcome. Evaluation metrics varied by task, but performance was overall poor to moderate for the best reported scores. In models that used feature importance, pre-event PROMs were the most predictive of post-event PROMs. Fairness assessments were rare (n = 6). These findings reinforce the necessity of the integrating patient values and preferences, beyond demographic factors, to improve the development of personalized PPP models for incapacitated patients.Conclusion The primary objective of a PPP is to estimate patient-reported quality of life following an intervention. Use of machine learning to predict PROMs for capacitated patients introduces challenges and opportunities for building a personalized PPP for incapacitated patients without advanced directives.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Development and Validation of Dynamic Multivariate Prediction Models of Sexual Function Recovery in Patients with Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the MUSIC Statewide Collaborative [J].
Agochukwu-Mmonu, Nnenaya ;
Murali, Adharsh ;
Wittmann, Daniela ;
Denton, Brian ;
Dunn, Rodney L. ;
Montie, James ;
Peabody, James ;
Miller, David ;
Singh, Karandeep .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2022, 40 :1-8
[2]   Using Machine Learning to Predict Nonachievement of Clinically Significant Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair [J].
Alaiti, Rafael Krasic ;
Vallio, Caio Sain ;
Assuncao, Jorge Henrique ;
de Andrade e Silva, Fernando Brandao ;
Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto ;
Neto, Arnaldo Amado Ferreira ;
Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli .
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (10)
[3]   Development of predictive models for all individual questions of SRS-22R after adult spinal deformity surgery: a step toward individualized medicine [J].
Ames, Christopher P. ;
Smith, Justin S. ;
Pellise, Ferran ;
Kelly, Michael ;
Gum, Jeffrey L. ;
Alanay, Ahmet ;
Acaroglu, Emre ;
Sanchez Perez-Grueso, Francisco Javier ;
Kleinstueck, Frank S. ;
Obeid, Ibrahim ;
Vila-Casademunt, Alba ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I., Jr. ;
Burton, Douglas C. ;
Lafage, Virginie ;
Schwab, Frank J. ;
Shaffrey, Christopher I., Sr. ;
Bess, Shay ;
Serra-Burriel, Miquel .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2019, 28 (09) :1998-2011
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2023, ELICIT AI RES ASSIST
[5]  
Assistant P., 2023, Predicting consumer behaviour with artificial intelligence
[6]   Development of machine learning models to predict cancer-related fatigue in Dutch breast cancer survivors up to 15 years after diagnosis [J].
Beenhakker, Lian ;
Wijlens, Kim A. E. ;
Witteveen, Annemieke ;
Heins, Marianne ;
Korevaar, Joke C. ;
de Ligt, Kelly M. ;
Bode, Christina ;
Vollenbroek-Hutten, Miriam M. R. ;
Siesling, Sabine .
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2025, 19 (02) :580-593
[7]   Should Artificial Intelligence be used to support clinical ethical decision-making? A systematic review of reasons [J].
Benzinger, Lasse ;
Ursin, Frank ;
Balke, Wolf-Tilo ;
Kacprowski, Tim ;
Salloch, Sabine .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 24 (01)
[8]   Algorithm-Aided Prediction of Patient Preferences - An Ethics Sneak Peek [J].
Biller-Andorno, Nikola ;
Biller, Armin .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 381 (15) :1480-1485
[9]  
Bone C, 2021, LANCET DIGIT HEALTH, V3, pE231, DOI 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00018-2
[10]  
Brinkman Niels, 2023, OTA Int, V6, pe284, DOI 10.1097/OI9.0000000000000284