Minimally invasive cytoreduction for advanced-stage ovarian cancer-a narrative review

被引:0
作者
Levin, Gabriel [1 ]
Gotlieb, Walter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol, 3755 Chem Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
关键词
Ovarian cancer; minimally invasive surgery (MIS); robotic surgery; INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; ONCOLOGY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.21037/gpm-24-25
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Ovarian cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional open surgical approaches for ovarian cancer often entail extensive radical surgery leading to prolonged recovery times. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become a promising alternative for gynecological malignancies, offering potential benefits such as reduced perioperative morbidity, faster recovery, and comparable oncologic outcomes. Despite increasing adoption, the role of MIS in the management of ovarian cancer requires further elucidation. This narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence on the role of MIS in the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Specifically, it seeks to evaluate the feasibility, and oncologic outcomes associated with MIS approaches, including laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques. Methods: A narrative review was performed, including all pertinent publication pertaining to MIS cytoreduction for advanced stage ovarian cancer. We did not follow a systematic review pathway and included all study designs. Key Content and Findings: MIS cytoreduction for advanced stage ovarian cancer is feasible and gaining popularity, mainly in the context of increased utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. No level I evidence is available regarding the oncological safety of this approach, but notwithstanding a significant risk of selection bias, retrospective data suggest that the progression-free survival and overall survival might not be jeopardised. Conclusions: In an era where lifespan, but also health span are gaining importance, tailored cytoreductive surgery using MIS could be of value for selected patients, aiming to minimize morbidity and maximize quality of life in advanced stage ovarian cancer without compromising oncologic outcomes. Based on the available published literature, MIS cytoreduction, mainly since the introduction of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and the robotic platform, is a promising option for patients and warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[11]   Laparoscopic versus robotic abdominal and pelvic surgery: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials [J].
Kawka, Michal ;
Fong, Yuman ;
Gall, Tamara M. H. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (09) :6672-6681
[12]   Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial [J].
Kehoe, Sean ;
Hook, Jane ;
Nankivell, Matthew ;
Jayson, Gordon C. ;
Kitchener, Henry ;
Lopes, Tito ;
Luesley, David ;
Perren, Timothy ;
Bannoo, Selina ;
Mascarenhas, Monica ;
Dobbs, Stephen ;
Essapen, Sharadah ;
Twigg, Jeremy ;
Herod, Jonathan ;
McCluggage, Glenn ;
Parmar, Mahesh ;
Swart, Ann-Marie .
LANCET, 2015, 386 (9990) :249-257
[13]   Robotic Surgery Gynecologic Oncology [J].
Krill, Lauren S. ;
Bristow, Robert E. .
CANCER JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (02) :167-176
[14]   Robotic surgery in obstetrics and gynecology: a bibliometric study [J].
Levin, Gabriel ;
Siedhoff, Matthew ;
Wright, Kelly N. ;
Truong, Mireille D. ;
Hamilton, Kacey ;
Brezinov, Yoav ;
Gotlieb, Walter ;
Meyer, Raanan .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (05) :2387-2397
[15]   Epithelial ovarian cancer [J].
Lheureux, Stephanie ;
Gourley, Charlie ;
Vergote, Ignace ;
Oza, Amit M. .
LANCET, 2019, 393 (10177) :1240-1253
[16]   Robotic approach for ovarian cancer: Perioperative and survival results and comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy [J].
Magrina, Javier F. ;
Zanagnolo, Vanna ;
Noble, Brie N. ;
Kho, Rosanne M. ;
Magtibay, Paul .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (01) :100-105
[17]   Trends in the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States [J].
Melamed, Alexander ;
Hinchcliff, Emily M. ;
Clemmer, Joel T. ;
Bregar, Amy J. ;
Uppal, Shitanshu ;
Bostock, Ian ;
Schorge, John O. ;
del Carmen, Marcela G. ;
Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 143 (02) :236-240
[18]   Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complication Rates Between Conventional Versus Robotic- Assisted Laparoscopy in the Evaluation and Management of Early, Advanced, and Recurrent Stage Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer [J].
Nezhat, Farr Reza ;
Finger, Tamara Natasha ;
Vetere, Patrick ;
Radjabi, Amir Reza ;
Vega, Mario ;
Averbuch, Lauren ;
Khalil, Susan ;
Altinbas, Sadiman Kiykac ;
Lax, Daniel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (03) :600-607
[19]   Laparoscopic cytoreduction After Neoadjuvant ChEmotherapy (LANCE) [J].
Nitecki, Roni ;
Rauh-Hain, Jose Alejandro ;
Melamed, Alexander ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Pareja, Rene ;
Coleman, Robert L. ;
Ramirez, Pedro T. ;
Fagotti, Anna .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2020, 30 (09) :1450-1454
[20]   Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602 [J].
Onda, Takashi ;
Satoh, Toyomi ;
Saito, Toshiaki ;
Kasamatsu, Takahiro ;
Nakanishi, Toru ;
Nakamura, Kenichi ;
Wakabayashi, Masashi ;
Takehara, Kazuhiro ;
Saito, Motoaki ;
Ushijima, Kimio ;
Kobayashi, Hiroaki ;
Kawana, Kei ;
Yokota, Harushige ;
Takano, Masashi ;
Takeshima, Nobuhiro ;
Watanabe, Yoh ;
Yaegashi, Nobuo ;
Konishi, Ikuo ;
Kamura, Toshiharu ;
Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 64 :22-31