Minimally invasive cytoreduction for advanced-stage ovarian cancer-a narrative review

被引:0
作者
Levin, Gabriel [1 ]
Gotlieb, Walter H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Div Gynecol Oncol, 3755 Chem Cote St Catherine, Montreal, PQ H3T 1E2, Canada
关键词
Ovarian cancer; minimally invasive surgery (MIS); robotic surgery; INTERVAL DEBULKING SURGERY; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ROBOTIC SURGERY; MANAGEMENT; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; ONCOLOGY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.21037/gpm-24-25
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background and Objective: Ovarian cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional open surgical approaches for ovarian cancer often entail extensive radical surgery leading to prolonged recovery times. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become a promising alternative for gynecological malignancies, offering potential benefits such as reduced perioperative morbidity, faster recovery, and comparable oncologic outcomes. Despite increasing adoption, the role of MIS in the management of ovarian cancer requires further elucidation. This narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence on the role of MIS in the treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Specifically, it seeks to evaluate the feasibility, and oncologic outcomes associated with MIS approaches, including laparoscopic and robotic-assisted techniques. Methods: A narrative review was performed, including all pertinent publication pertaining to MIS cytoreduction for advanced stage ovarian cancer. We did not follow a systematic review pathway and included all study designs. Key Content and Findings: MIS cytoreduction for advanced stage ovarian cancer is feasible and gaining popularity, mainly in the context of increased utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. No level I evidence is available regarding the oncological safety of this approach, but notwithstanding a significant risk of selection bias, retrospective data suggest that the progression-free survival and overall survival might not be jeopardised. Conclusions: In an era where lifespan, but also health span are gaining importance, tailored cytoreductive surgery using MIS could be of value for selected patients, aiming to minimize morbidity and maximize quality of life in advanced stage ovarian cancer without compromising oncologic outcomes. Based on the available published literature, MIS cytoreduction, mainly since the introduction of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and the robotic platform, is a promising option for patients and warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Incorporating robotic surgery into the management of ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Abitbol, Jeremie ;
Gotlieb, Walter ;
Zeng, Ziggy ;
Ramanakumar, Agnihotram ;
Kessous, Roy ;
Kogan, Liron ;
Pare-Miron, Valerie ;
Rombaldi, Marcelo ;
Salvador, Shannon ;
Kucukyazici, Beste ;
Brin, Sonya ;
How, Jeffrey ;
Lau, Susie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 (09) :1341-1347
[2]   Interval robotic cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Ackroyd S.A. ;
Thomas S. ;
Angel C. ;
Moore R. ;
Meacham P.J. ;
DuBeshter B. .
Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12 (2) :245-250
[3]   Minimally invasive interval debulking surgery in ovarian neoplasm (MISSION trial-NCT02324595): a feasibility study [J].
Alletti, Salvatore Gueli ;
Bottoni, Carolina ;
Fanfani, Francesco ;
Gallotta, Valerio ;
Chiantera, Vito ;
Costantini, Barbara ;
Cosentino, Francesco ;
Ercoli, Alfredo ;
Scambia, Giovanni ;
Fagotti, Anna .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (04) :503.e1-503.e6
[4]   Robotic-assisted interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: a feasibility study [J].
Carbajal-Mamani, Semiramis L. ;
Schweer, David ;
Markham, Merry J. ;
Esnakula, Ashwini K. ;
Grajo, Joseph R. ;
Castagno, Jacqueline C. ;
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel .
OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY SCIENCE, 2020, 63 (02) :150-157
[5]   Chemotherapy versus surgery for initial treatment in advanced ovarian epithelial cancer [J].
Coleridge, Sarah L. ;
Bryant, Andrew ;
Kehoe, Sean ;
Morrison, Jo .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, (02)
[6]   Phase III randomised clinical trial comparing primary surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with high tumour load (SCORPION trial): Final analysis of peri-operative outcome [J].
Fagotti, Anna ;
Ferrandina, Gabriella ;
Vizzielli, Giuseppe ;
Fanfani, Francesco ;
Gallotta, Valerio ;
Chiantera, Vito ;
Costantini, Barbara ;
Margariti, Pasquale Alessandro ;
Alletti, Salvatore Gueli ;
Cosentino, Francesco ;
Tortorella, Lucia ;
Scambia, Giovanni .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 59 :22-33
[7]   Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for FIGO stage I ovarian cancer [J].
Falcetta, Frederico S. ;
Lawrie, Theresa A. ;
Medeiros, Lidia R. F. ;
da Rosa, Maria Ines ;
Edelweiss, Maria I. ;
Stein, Airton T. ;
Zelmanowicz, Alice ;
Moraes, Anaelena B. ;
Zanini, Roselaine R. ;
Rosa, Daniela D. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (10)
[8]   Perioperative and clinical outcomes in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer using a robotic or abdominal approach [J].
Feuer, Gerald A. ;
Lakhi, Nisha ;
Barker, James ;
Salmieri, Stephen ;
Burrell, Mathew .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (03) :520-524
[9]   Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology [J].
Fleming, Nicole D. ;
Ramirez, Pedro T. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2012, 24 (05) :547-553
[10]   Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the surgical management of apparent early stage ovarian cancer [J].
Ghezzi, Fabio ;
Cromi, Antonella ;
Uccella, Stefano ;
Bergamini, Valentino ;
Tomera, Silvia ;
Franchi, Massimo ;
Bolis, Pierfrancesco .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2007, 105 (02) :409-413