Risk of Anaphylaxis Among New Users of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Cohort Study

被引:2
作者
Anthony, Mary S. [1 ]
Aroda, Vanita R. [2 ]
Parlett, Lauren E. [3 ]
Djebarri, Leila [4 ]
Berreghis, Sofia [4 ]
Calingaert, Brian [1 ]
Beachler, Daniel C. [3 ]
Crowe, Christopher L. [3 ]
Johannes, Catherine B. [5 ]
Juhaeri, Juhaeri [6 ]
Lanes, Stephan [3 ]
Pan, Chunshen [6 ]
Rothman, Kenneth J. [5 ]
Saltus, Catherine W. [5 ]
Walsh, Kathleen E. [7 ]
机构
[1] RTI Hlth Solut, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[3] Carelon Res, Wilmington, DE USA
[4] Sanofi, Chilly Mazarin, France
[5] RTI Hlth Solut, Waltham, MA USA
[6] Sanofi Inc, Bridgewater, NJ USA
[7] Boston Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.2337/dc23-1911
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To assess risk of anaphylaxis among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are initiating therapy with a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), with a focus on those starting lixisenatide therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A cohort study was conducted in three large, U.S. claims databases (2017-2021). Adult (aged >= 18 years) new users of a GLP-1 RA who had type 2 diabetes mellitus and >= 6 months enrollment in the database before GLP-1 RA initiation (start of follow-up) were included. GLP-1 RAs evaluated were lixisenatide, an insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination (FRC), exenatide, liraglutide or insulin degludec/liraglutide FRC, dulaglutide, and semaglutide (injectable and oral). The first anaphylaxis event during follow-up was identified using a validated algorithm. Incidence rates (IRs) and 95% CIs were calculated within each medication cohort. The unadjusted IR ratio (IRR) comparing anaphylaxis rates in the lixisenatide cohort with all other GLP-1 RAs combined was analyzed post hoc. RESULTS There were 696,089 new users with 456,612 person-years of exposure to GLP-1 RAs. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and use of other prescription medications in the 6 months before the index date were similar across medication cohorts. IRs (95% CIs) per 10,000 person-years were 1.0 (0.0-5.6) for lixisenatide, 6.0 (3.6-9.4) for exenatide, 5.1 (3.7-7.0) for liraglutide, 3.9 (3.1-4.8) for dulaglutide, and 3.6 (2.6-4.9) for semaglutide. The IRR (95% CI) for the anaphylaxis rate for the lixisenatide cohort compared with the pooled other GLP-1 RA cohort was 0.24 (0.01-1.35). CONCLUSIONS Anaphylaxis is rare with GLP-1 RAs. Lixisenatide is unlikely to confer higher risk of anaphylaxis than other GLP-1 RAs.
引用
收藏
页码:712 / 719
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2022, Sanofi U.S. Medication guide: Soliqua 100/33
  • [2] AstraZeneca AB, 2022, AstraZeneca AB 25 August
  • [3] AstraZeneca AB, 2022, AstraZeneca AB26 August
  • [4] Development and validation of a predictive model algorithm to identify anaphylaxis in adults with type 2 diabetes in US administrative claims data
    Beachler, Daniel C.
    Taylor, Devon H.
    Anthony, Mary S.
    Yin, Ruihua
    Li, Ling
    Saltus, Catherine W.
    Li, Lin
    Shaunik, Alka
    Walsh, Kathleen E.
    Rothman, Kenneth J.
    Johannes, Catherine B.
    Aroda, Vanita R.
    Carr, Warner
    Goldberg, Pinkus
    Accardi, Andrew
    O'Shura, John Shane
    Sharma, Kristen
    Juhaeri, Juhaeri
    Lanes, Stephan
    Wu, Chuntao
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2021, 30 (07) : 918 - 926
  • [5] CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS FOR WEIGHTED SUMS OF POISSON PARAMETERS
    DOBSON, AJ
    KUULASMAA, K
    EBERLE, E
    SCHERER, J
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1991, 10 (03) : 457 - 462
  • [6] Eli Lilly, 2021, Trulicity (dulaglutide) 0.75 mg (or 1.5mg or 3 mg or 4.5 mg) solution for injection in prefilled pen
  • [7] Validation to correct for outcome misclassification bias
    Lanes, Stephan
    Beachler, Daniel C.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2023, 32 (06) : 700 - 703
  • [8] Identifying health outcomes in healthcare databases
    Lanes, Stephan
    Brown, Jeffrey S.
    Haynes, Kevin
    Pollack, Michael F.
    Walker, Alexander M.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1009 - 1016
  • [10] Novo Nordisk A/S, 2022, Novo Nordisk A/S16 November