Prognosis and Management of Recurrent Stenosis After Pulmonary Vein Stenting A Prospective Study

被引:0
作者
Wang, Xiaolei [1 ]
Yu, Jie [2 ]
Wang, Cheng [1 ]
Li, Yanjie [1 ]
Hou, Xumin [1 ]
Ma, Lan [3 ]
He, Ben [1 ]
Cao, Yunshan [4 ]
Pan, Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Dept Cardiol, 241 West Huaihai Rd, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Yantai Mt Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Yantai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Chest Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Echocardiog, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sichuan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Heart Lung & Vessels Ctr, 2006 Xiayuan Ave, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
关键词
balloon angioplasty; in-stent restenosis; pulmonary vein stenosis; stent-; in-stent; vascular patency; BARE METAL STENTS; BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY; RESTENOSIS; ABLATION; IMPLANTATION; CATHETER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacep.2024.09.022
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Pulmonary vein stenting is effective for severe pulmonary vein stenosis, which is limited by restenosis. The assessment and management of in-stent restenosis (ISR) are inadequate, and follow-up outcomes after reintervention remain unknown. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the prognosis and management of pulmonary vein ISR and determine whether the modified stent-in-stent strategy is superior to balloon angioplasty (BA) in treating ISR. METHODS The authors conducted a prospective observational study on patients with severe pulmonary vein stenosis post radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. RESULTS A total of 107 patients with 174 severely stenosed veins underwent successful stenting. Forty-three veins among 36 patients experienced ISR (24.7%, 43 of 174). Veins developing ISR had smaller diameter stents (7.8 f 0.8 mm vs 9.2 f 0.7 mm; P = 0.008). Restenosis veins were assigned to BA group or stent-in-stent group. Success rate was 95.7% for BA and 90.0% for stent-in-stent. Twelve veins experienced recurrent ISR, including 2 in stent-in-stent group (11.1%, 2 of 18) and 10 in BA group (45.5%, 10 of 22). The risk of recurrent stenosis was significantly lower in veins treated with the stent-in-stent method than with BA (HR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.64; P = 0.02). Patients in the stent-instent group had greater exercise endurance and better World Health Organization cardiac functional class compared with BA group (F = 7.2; P < 0.05; and F = 4.4; P < 0.05, respectively) at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS Our modified stent-in-stent implantation approach is superior to BA for treating pulmonary vein ISR, by reducing recurrent restenosis rate and improving exercise endurance. (JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2025;11:46-55) (c) 2025 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 55
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]  
Khan A., Qureshi A.M., Justino H., Comparison of drug eluting versus bare metal stents for pulmonary vein stenosis in childhood, Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 94, 2, pp. 233-242, (2019)
[12]  
Balasubramanian S., Marshall A.C., Gauvreau K., Et al., Outcomes after stent implantation for the treatment of congenital and postoperative pulmonary vein stenosis in children, Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 5, pp. 109-117, (2012)
[13]  
Albers E.L., Pugh M.E., Hill K.D., Et al., Percutaneous vascular stent implantation as treatment for central vascular obstruction due to fibrosing mediastinitis, Circulation, 123, 13, pp. 1391-1399, (2011)
[14]  
Widmer R.J., Fender E.A., Hodge D.O., Et al., Contributors toward pulmonary vein restenosis following successful intervention, JACC Clin Electrophysiol, 4, 4, pp. 547-552, (2018)
[15]  
Desimone C.V., Holmes D.J., Ebrille E., Et al., Direct pulmonary vein ablation with stenosis prevention therapy, J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 26, 9, pp. 1000-1006, (2015)
[16]  
Simard T., Sarma D., Miranda W.R., Et al., Pathogenesis, evaluation, and management of pulmonary vein stenosis: JACC Review Topic of the Week, J Am Coll Cardiol, 81, 24, pp. 2361-2373, (2023)
[17]  
Goto K., Zhao Z., Matsumura M., Et al., Mechanisms and patterns of intravascular ultrasound in-stent restenosis among bare metal stents and first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents, Am J Cardiol, 116, 9, pp. 1351-1357, (2015)
[18]  
Nakazawa G., Otsuka F., Nakano M., Et al., The pathology of neoatherosclerosis in human coronary implants bare-metal and drug-eluting stents, J Am Coll Cardiol, 57, 11, pp. 1314-1322, (2011)
[19]  
Byrne R.A., Joner M., Tada T., Kastrati A., Restenosis in bare metal and drug-eluting stents: distinct mechanistic insights from histopathology and optical intravascular imaging, Minerva Cardioangiol, 60, 5, pp. 473-489, (2012)
[20]  
Simard T., Hibbert B., Ramirez F.D., Et al., The evolution of coronary stents: a brief review, Can J Cardiol, 30, 1, pp. 35-45, (2014)