The enigma of Nagorno-Karabakh: a 'hierarchised amoebic composite' with Armenia

被引:0
作者
Hynek, Nik [1 ]
Ter-Ghazaryan, Levon [1 ]
机构
[1] Metropolitan Univ Prague, Dept Int Relat & European Studies, Dubecska 900-10, Prague 10, Czech Republic
关键词
Amoebic spatiality; hierarchised composite; Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia; spatial and identitarian contingency; critical junctures; CONFLICT; STATES; STRATEGIES; DEMOCRACY; CAUCASUS; POLITICS; BORDERS; REGION;
D O I
10.1080/15387216.2024.2410721
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Based on a comprehensive examination of Nagorno-Karabakh's critical junctures within Armenian-Azerbaijani relations, this article introduces the concept of the "hierarchized amoebic composite" framework. This model surpasses traditional paradigms of state sovereignty and territorial disputes by revealing the dynamic and contingent relationships within composite structures. Empirically, we use the Nagorno-Karabakh-Armenia relationship to demonstrate the framework's applicability. Central to our analysis are two key research questions: how can we conceptually and empirically reflect on the relationship between Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia and what have been the factors influencing patterns of stability and change in this relationship? We argue that Nagorno-Karabakh demonstrates amoebic spatiality, characterized by its ability to be both integrated into and dissociated from Armenia. This relationship is further influenced by the Russian neo-imperial presence, which redefines the region's strategic calculus. Our research explores two key dyads of interaction between Armenia and Nagorno-Karabakh: identity and territory for contingency and amoebicity, and diplomacy and economy for stable interconnection. Although Nagorno-Karabakh was seized by Azerbaijan and its unrecognized republic dissolved in 2024, the hierarchized amoebic composite framework allows us to study the ongoing transformation. We suggest that while traditional perspectives consider the conflict resolved with Nagorno-Karabakh's incorporation into Azerbaijan, our framework indicates a spatial shift of the conflict's epicenter to Armenia. This shift involves the same actors in a reconfigured yet persistent struggle, highlighting the conflict's evolving nature. Through this perspective, we offer fresh insights into conflict mechanisms and coexistence in post-Soviet spaces and beyond, challenging the Westphalian model's limits in explaining the complex spatial realities.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
Adamczewski Przemysaw., 2012, The Caucasus Globalization, V6, P39
[2]  
Aivazian Armen., 2001, The Making of Nagorno-Karabagh: From Secession to Republic, P202, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1057/97802305089658, DOI 10.1057/97802305089658]
[3]  
Alieva Leila., 2023, De-Colonising the Azerbaijan-Armenian Conflict: Breaking the Knot of Security and Dependence
[4]  
Anderson O. Roger., 2021, Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, by Wiley, V1st, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0029299, DOI 10.1002/9780470015902.A0029299]
[5]  
Andrews Matt., 2017, Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action, P29, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198747482.003.0003
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Perspective - Azerbaijan Takeover of Nagorno-Karabakh: Victory of 'Authoritarian Power Over Struggling Democracy'
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2024, Euronews
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2023, PM Says Armenia Ready to Recognize Karabakh as Part of Azerbaijan | Eurasianet
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ECtHRGC Chiragov and Others v. Armenia
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Artsakh is Armenia,' Says Pashinyan During Stepanakert Rally - Asbarez.Com