What do changes in policy regarding the teaching of phonics since 1995 disclose about successive UK education policymakers' understanding of early reading skills?

被引:0
作者
Betteney, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greenwich, London, England
关键词
early reading; education policy; pedagogy; phonics;
D O I
10.1111/lit.70001
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This article explores the underpinning assumptions about the changing definition and parameters of early reading that are contained in successive UK Departments for Education (DfE, DfES, DfEE) documentation since 1995 and in Ofsted (Office for Standards in Education, Children's Services and Skills) reports and official blogs during the same period. It employs a chronological presentation of key phrases within policy documents and grey literature to identify and track the changing attitudes held by the writers of these documents regarding the skills deemed to be officially important in learning to read. The article acknowledges and explores the contested nature of the field. The exploration of these policy documents demonstrates that although UK National Curricula since 1995, including the current one, have consistently identified that skills of early reading are multifaceted, this contrasts strongly with policy, guidance and inspection frameworks in the same period, which have increasingly sat, and continue to sit, within a view of reading underpinned by rigid and narrow definitions of early reading in which phonics is pre-eminent.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, READING CHANGE PERFO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, The National Curriculum
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, DfE website
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The National Curriculum. Handbook for primary teachers in England
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, STAT FRAM EARL YEARS
[7]   There is still little or no evidence that systematic phonics is more effective than common alternative methods of reading instruction: Response to Brooks (2023) [J].
Bowers, Jeffrey S. .
REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2023, 11 (03)
[8]   Yes Children Need to Learn Their GPCs but There Really Is Little or No Evidence that Systematic or Explicit Phonics Is Effective: a response to Fletcher, Savage, and Sharon (2020) [J].
Bowers, Jeffrey S. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2021, 33 (04) :1965-1979
[9]   Reconsidering the Evidence That Systematic Phonics Is More Effective Than Alternative Methods of Reading Instruction [J].
Bowers, Jeffrey S. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 32 (03) :681-705
[10]   The impact of the Phonics Screening Check on grouping by ability: A "necessary evil' amid the policy storm [J].
Bradbury, Alice .
BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2018, 44 (04) :539-556