The impact of de-familization on green innovation: Evidence from SRDI family firms in China

被引:0
作者
Huang, Jiarong [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Lixin [1 ]
Song, Shuai [3 ]
Zhou, Hanwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Inst Chengdu Chongqing Econ Zone Dev, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Finance & Econ Coll, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Univ Polit Sci & Law, Business Sch, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENTS; SOCIOEMOTIONAL WEALTH; PERFORMANCE; OWNERSHIP; AGENCY; TECHNOLOGIES; SEPARATION; PRESSURES; STRATEGY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0314110
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Green innovation is essential for sustainable development, especially in China's Specialized-Refined-Differentiated-Innovative (SRDI) enterprises. Family-owned SRDI firms, in particular, have attracted attention due to their de-familization strategies and their influence on green innovation. Our study analyzes panel data from 2016 to 2021 for listed SRDI family firms to investigate how de-familization in management rights and ownership impacts green innovation. Using socio-emotional wealth (SEW) theory and a fixed-effects model, we find that de-familization significantly negatively affects green innovation, with corporate governance serving as a mediating factor. Digital transformation moderates these negative effects, while market concentration exacerbates them. These impacts are more pronounced in firms before being designated as "Little Giants," those receiving higher government subsidies, those located in eastern regions, or those not classified as major polluters. This research provides actionable insights for SRDI family firms to strategically manage de-familization, optimize resource allocation, implement customized governance strategies, and promote sustainable growth.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Empire-builders and shirkers: Investment, firm performance, and managerial incentives
    Aggarwal, Rajesh K.
    Samwick, Andrew A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2006, 12 (03) : 489 - 515
  • [2] Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500
    Anderson, RC
    Reeb, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (03) : 1301 - 1328
  • [3] Family-Controlled Firms and Informed Trading: Evidence from Short Sales
    Anderson, Ronald C.
    Reeb, David M.
    Zhao, Wanli
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2012, 67 (01) : 351 - 385
  • [4] Baker JB., 2017, Washington Center for Equitable Growth, V5
  • [5] Does green transformational leadership lead to green innovation? The role of green thinking and creative process engagement
    Begum, Saira
    Ashfaq, Muhammad
    Xia, Enjun
    Awan, Usama
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (01) : 580 - 597
  • [6] Socioemotional Wealth and Corporate Responses to Institutional Pressures: Do Family-Controlled Firms Pollute Less?
    Berrone, Pascual
    Cruz, Cristina
    Gomez-Mejia, Luis R.
    Larraza-Kintana, Martin
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2010, 55 (01) : 82 - 113
  • [7] R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective
    Block, Joern H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2012, 27 (02) : 248 - 265
  • [8] Creating an environment for successful nonfamily CEOs: An exploratory study of good principals
    Blumentritt, Timothy P.
    Keyt, Andrew D.
    Astrachan, Joseph H.
    [J]. FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2007, 20 (04) : 321 - 335
  • [9] Brammer S., 2006, BUS ETHICS, V15, P6, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-8608.2006.00424.X
  • [10] Family CEOs: Do they benefit firm performance in China?
    Cai, Di
    Luo, Jin-hui
    Wan, Di-fang
    [J]. ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2012, 29 (04) : 923 - 947